Ask a Professional Detailer...
#811
Originally Posted by indef35
thanks george
Originally Posted by pczavala
My girlfriend gave me this milwaukee polisher that was laying around in her storage for a while, Is this something similiar to the porter cable? can i use the pads you offer? what would i need -see link below for product detail-
http://www.milwaukeeconnect.com/weba...192198_192137#
http://www.milwaukeeconnect.com/weba...192198_192137#
Hope this helps. If you have any other questions, let me know.
George
#812
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
George . . . .
I need to ask for another recommendation please.
I posted a while back about some 'clouding' on the hood of an IP which SIP followed by 106ff wouldn't correct. Your thoughts along with some others indicated that the problem was with the paint itself and it turns out that was absolutely correct.
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad. I'll be using a pc for the work. Thanks in advance.
I need to ask for another recommendation please.
I posted a while back about some 'clouding' on the hood of an IP which SIP followed by 106ff wouldn't correct. Your thoughts along with some others indicated that the problem was with the paint itself and it turns out that was absolutely correct.
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad. I'll be using a pc for the work. Thanks in advance.
#813
Originally Posted by SCoupe
George . . . .
I need to ask for another recommendation please.
I posted a while back about some 'clouding' on the hood of an IP which SIP followed by 106ff wouldn't correct. Your thoughts along with some others indicated that the problem was with the paint itself and it turns out that was absolutely correct.
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad. I'll be using a pc for the work. Thanks in advance.
I need to ask for another recommendation please.
I posted a while back about some 'clouding' on the hood of an IP which SIP followed by 106ff wouldn't correct. Your thoughts along with some others indicated that the problem was with the paint itself and it turns out that was absolutely correct.
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad. I'll be using a pc for the work. Thanks in advance.
What sized pads are you using? Using smaller pads on a PC will offer more bite and can remove deeper imperfections. Consider trying the polishing with 4" pads.
You may need to try something more aggressive if SIP isn't cutting enough to rid the imperfections.
Talk soon,
George
#814
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Detailed Image
If the clouding wasn't removed with SIP / 106FF, then using 106FA or Power Finish wouldn't make any more of a difference, unless of course it was the lack of number of applications that prevented you the first time from clearing up the clouding. SIP is more cutting than Power Finish and PO106FF / FA are nearly identical.
What sized pads are you using? Using smaller pads on a PC will offer more bite and can remove deeper imperfections. Consider trying the polishing with 4" pads.
You may need to try something more aggressive if SIP isn't cutting enough to rid the imperfections.
Talk soon, George
What sized pads are you using? Using smaller pads on a PC will offer more bite and can remove deeper imperfections. Consider trying the polishing with 4" pads.
You may need to try something more aggressive if SIP isn't cutting enough to rid the imperfections.
Talk soon, George
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job of removing the minor swirls on new clearcoat or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad.
I can use either 6.5 or 4" pads
Would also like to ask if ONR can be blown dry then wiped ?
#815
Originally Posted by SCoupe
Thanks George but let me try again.
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job of removing the minor swirls on new clearcoat or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad.
I can use either 6.5 or 4" pads
Would also like to ask if ONR can be blown dry then wiped ?
I've had the front end repainted with a double clear over the top. The shop buffed it out with an orbital and left some very minor swirls which I'm going to work on myself.
My question is, would you recommend 106fa for the job of removing the minor swirls on new clearcoat or maybe even Power Finish along with which pad.
I can use either 6.5 or 4" pads
Would also like to ask if ONR can be blown dry then wiped ?
You certainly can use a blower with ONR, it'll help remove water from the seams, trim, etc. then just go and blot / wipe any remaining water and residue. I will mist a little QD on my towel to help ensure there's no residue remaining.
Sorry about the last response, hope this answers it better!
George
#816
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you sir .... that was just right as usual
Originally Posted by Detailed Image
Sorry about that SCoupe, I read it as the shop caused the clouding because of what they did. Yes, you always want to start with the least aggressive option, which 106FF/FA is an excellent choice to begin with. If that wasn't doing the trick, try Power Finish or SIP next. When using the PC for correction, it seems 4" pads is the way to go. For glazes, sealants and liquid waxes, I prefer the larger pads because you can spread the product thinner, further, without reapplying more product. 106FA on white would be a great starting point, then I'd try Power Finish with white, then Power Finish on orange or SIP on orange as your next resort.
You certainly can use a blower with ONR, it'll help remove water from the seams, trim, etc. then just go and blot / wipe any remaining water and residue. I will mist a little QD on my towel to help ensure there's no residue remaining.
Sorry about the last response, hope this answers it better!
George
You certainly can use a blower with ONR, it'll help remove water from the seams, trim, etc. then just go and blot / wipe any remaining water and residue. I will mist a little QD on my towel to help ensure there's no residue remaining.
Sorry about the last response, hope this answers it better!
George
#817
Originally Posted by Detailed Image
No problem
This is a rotary buffer, different than a random orbital buffer like the Porter Cable 7424. Rotary buffers spin in one continuous direction at a high RPM, which has the potential to generate a lot of heat, leading to more risk to the paint. Rotary buffers are more likely to burn the paint, leave behind holograms, buffer trails and other things associated with rotary buffers. The description on your link suggests using 7" - 9" pads, which is way to large for a first time rotary user to use. With a rotary buffer, the larger the pad, the more dangerous it is since the outer edges are spinning the fastest. You could pick up a smaller backing plate for the buffer and test the waters with smaller pads, the two rotary backing plates we offer would fit the 5/8in-11 spindle. If you're dedicated to practicing on some scrap pieces or cars you don't mind potentially messing up, mastering a rotary buffer is much more effective than a PC. The problem is, it takes a good amount of practice and usually a few screw ups to get a solid grasp of the machine.
Hope this helps. If you have any other questions, let me know.
George
This is a rotary buffer, different than a random orbital buffer like the Porter Cable 7424. Rotary buffers spin in one continuous direction at a high RPM, which has the potential to generate a lot of heat, leading to more risk to the paint. Rotary buffers are more likely to burn the paint, leave behind holograms, buffer trails and other things associated with rotary buffers. The description on your link suggests using 7" - 9" pads, which is way to large for a first time rotary user to use. With a rotary buffer, the larger the pad, the more dangerous it is since the outer edges are spinning the fastest. You could pick up a smaller backing plate for the buffer and test the waters with smaller pads, the two rotary backing plates we offer would fit the 5/8in-11 spindle. If you're dedicated to practicing on some scrap pieces or cars you don't mind potentially messing up, mastering a rotary buffer is much more effective than a PC. The problem is, it takes a good amount of practice and usually a few screw ups to get a solid grasp of the machine.
Hope this helps. If you have any other questions, let me know.
George
THANK YOU!!! i will look into it, i have a old camaro i can practice on, i believe i will do that. that only reason why i asked was it has speed control so instead of getting a PC i decided to give this one a try, looks like i need to master the speed control and feel for things, Never used a machine before always waxed by hand so lets see how it goes! THANKS AGAIN!!!
#818
Originally Posted by pczavala
THANK YOU!!! i will look into it, i have a old camaro i can practice on, i believe i will do that. that only reason why i asked was it has speed control so instead of getting a PC i decided to give this one a try, looks like i need to master the speed control and feel for things, Never used a machine before always waxed by hand so lets see how it goes! THANKS AGAIN!!!
George
#819
not sure if this has been asked before but any opinions on boat waxes? they're obviously designed for protecting from a much harsher environment but would there be any drawbacks from using a product intended for a fiberglass body? are you familiar with the paint process and materials of boats? i'm assuming just a wax applied by hand would be safe and offer superb water and contamination protection. thanks.
#820
Originally Posted by Bigd2k6
not sure if this has been asked before but any opinions on boat waxes? they're obviously designed for protecting from a much harsher environment but would there be any drawbacks from using a product intended for a fiberglass body? are you familiar with the paint process and materials of boats? i'm assuming just a wax applied by hand would be safe and offer superb water and contamination protection. thanks.
George
#821
#822
Originally Posted by Detailed Image
Boats / fiberglass bodies are often gel coated instead of clear coated. You can treat them exactly the same as if they were clear coated, clean, polish, protect. There would be no harm in trying a wax that is designed to work on a boat, I personally do not have any experience with it, but I'm sure it'd protect your paint. I'm not sure how durable the protection will be or if you may sacrifice some gloss from using it, but it's worth a shot. Many detailers who detail boats use the same products they'd use on a car, so I doubt there's much if any difference between them.
George
George
Just adding some info, I don't know how many boat vs. car waxes this applies to.
#823
Originally Posted by Karma
Quick question, I'm about to have my front bumper repainted, then I'm getting a 3M clear bra installed. Can you polish or do anything to the front bumper to make it match the paint clarity/wet look of a freshly detailed car?
Sean
Sean
Originally Posted by Darkstar752
Another detailing forum that I belong to love Collinite and say it has excellent durability and shine. One of the members there recently found out that the 845 version(Car) and the 915(I think that's the number, but it's the boat wax version) are EXACTLY the same, he talked to a guy who works in Collinite. However, the boat version, even though it is the exact same thing, is cheaper.
Just adding some info, I don't know how many boat vs. car waxes this applies to.
Just adding some info, I don't know how many boat vs. car waxes this applies to.
George
#825
here's more of a technical question for polishers. say you have some fine scratches visible only in the light (they don't catch your nail) and water spots, etc that a medium grade clay bar won't remove. polishers remove a fraction of the clear coat, correct? what is the frequency of polisher usage to prevent eventually taking off the clear coat. in other words, how thick is the clear coat, in mils or ten (or hundredth??) thousandths of an inch and how much does the average polisher remove? have you ever come across a vehicle for a detail and you tell them any more polishing and you're going to go into the paint?