![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login |
|
| Register | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars | Garage | Vendor Directory |
| Welcome to G35Driver.com! |
|
|
Welcome to G35Driver.com. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join G35Driver.com community today! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
EPA/GM releases mpg for the Volt.
230 mpg city...not too bad.
__________________
2007 Infiniti G35S 5AT Prem/Navi/Tech/Euro Style Spoiler |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does that factor in the cost of any of the electricity used?
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thats like me asking "Does the EPA factor in the cost of gasoline in their mpg factor?"
The answer is an overwhelming "no". GM claims that you'd spend about the same amount of money charging the Volt per year as you would running your fridge for a year. Some studies claimed that if most people charged their cars overnight, it'd actually LOWER the cost of electricity. In fact, Henderson stated himself, that if you were to charge your car overnight during offpeak hours...it'd cost you a nice $0.40 to charge it. The downside to the car is that most people drive about 20 miles a day...so getting 40 miles on a single charge is overkill as it adds extra unnecessary capacity to the battery which adds cost and weight.
__________________
2007 Infiniti G35S 5AT Prem/Navi/Tech/Euro Style Spoiler Last edited by fecurtis; 08-11-2009 at 12:34 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was just making the point that electricity has to come from somewhere. It's more efficient to get power from power plants than it is to generate it from an engine, but it's still coming from somewhere. 230mpg makes it sound as if the car is so efficient, but in reality most of the power is coming from another source so of course very little fuel is burned.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
From CNN Money
Quote:
__________________
If I could write off your murder/I'd save all of my receipts/because I'd rather you be dead/ than lose a tiny shred of what I made this fiscal year |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Plus, i bet that the 40 miles is only if you don't have the radio cranked and the AC off. We're so use to getting all of our gadgets power for basically free from the alternator when now we have to be conscience about what we're using while driving in EC mode. I wouldn't be surprised that in the FL heat, that 40 miles is more like 25-30.
__________________
2006 LP Sedan, Stone interior |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
If I could write off your murder/I'd save all of my receipts/because I'd rather you be dead/ than lose a tiny shred of what I made this fiscal year |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll mod that car with the battery in the terminator =)
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
That 230 mpg claim is GM marketing hype. The EPA has already gone on record with a statement that they have not tested the Volt and have no idea what EPA rating it will receive. Also, GM has not disclosed the math they used to calculate the claimed 230 mpg. So, for right now the claim is good for generating some press buzz and not a lot else. And as someone else noted, the batteries don't do well in temperature extremes. Florida and Arizona residents will have one set of problems and owners in Maine and Montana will have a different set of problems.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| costs, electricity, overnight, volt |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|