I'm currently looking at 3 G35's:


2003 G35 Sedan - fully loaded without nav - around 140,000 km (87,000 miles) on it - good condition (paint good, minimal to no rust): $8500

2004 G35 Sedan - fully loaded w/ DVD players in headrests and cold air intake but no nav - around 140,000 km (87,000 miles) on it - pristine condition (not on blemish): $11,850

2005 G35X Sedan - fully loaded premium package - 96,000 km (60,000 miles) - good condition (couple of small scratches, minimal to no rust): $14,750


I haven't had them fully checked yet but this is under the impression that mechanically they check out.

Having no experience with G35's, I'm curious which of the three do people on here see as the best buy?

 

why not go with coupes?

 

Haven't found any that work for me price wise. All higher mileage for the most part or quite a bit more expensive.

 

which one do you like better... you dont want to get a car youre going to look back on.

 

The 2003 drove smooth but gives me the most red flags because the previous owner didn't know how well it was taken care of. The 2004 felt the best but previous owner worked at the dealership and got everything done cheap/for free (makes me think it could've been driven hard). The 2005 didn't drive as smooth as the other two but I partially chalk that up to sketchy tires and not being used to AWD.

All 3 have their plus/minuses, hence my indecision.

I'm curious from people who had owned any of those 3 cars whether there is a big difference in reliability/problems/costs associated with them.

 

run carfax / autocheck on all 3