G35Driver - Infiniti G35 & G37 Forum Discussion

G35Driver - Infiniti G35 & G37 Forum Discussion (https://g35driver.com/forums/)
-   G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 (https://g35driver.com/forums/g35-sedan-v35-2003-06-15/)
-   -   Does anyone down-shift to slow down? (https://g35driver.com/forums/g35-sedan-v35-2003-06/189308-does-anyone-down-shift-slow-down.html)

cimabeu 11-26-2007 01:25 PM

When I initially posted this question, I expected 4-5 answers with some level of detail-- at no point did I think that heat would replace light and that there would be more theory, conjecture and opinion than actual working knowledge.

This has been eye opening and leaves me with the sense that 50% of the folks here know something, 50% don't but think they do, another 50% know they know nothing but write in to throw in their -.000002 cents worth, 50% are lost, and the remaining 50% are standing by waiting for truth to emerge (Yep, I know all of these 50%'s are >100%-- but hey, it makes a point).

Soooooo-- does anyone really know the answer, unequivocally?

And finally, if this level of confusion exists with this one question, imagine how much more there is for the rest of the posts on this forum. And most importantly, how much misinformation is out there that car owners are making car decisions on
.

Jeff92se 11-26-2007 01:28 PM

The answer is "yes".

harrisot 11-26-2007 01:31 PM


Originally Posted by Jeff92se
The answer is "yes".

I agree unambiguously.

pjames 11-26-2007 01:35 PM

i do it all the time, have done it in every car i've owned, even the old 4 speed column shifts autos. if my '91 accord with 380k on it's original clutch could handle it, it can't do that much to the clutch.

as long as you aren't slamming it and shocking the drive train, it's not that bad, rev match even a bit, and it'll be smooth. if you're worried about the clutch-pack in the torque converter, change your valving. firming the shifts (shorter clutch cycles) will make for much less wear on your clutch packs.
the shocks that are associated with sudden gear changes will only risk damaging the componants if you are pushing excessive power.

downshifting to decelerate is actually covered on the theory exam to get your permit here. and the correct answer is yes, it is the proper thing to do.

i don't know if you ever noticed the normal operation of an automatic transmission, if you take your foot of the gas, and decelerate to a certain point, it will downshift by itself.

and it has been proven many times that it does in fact require less fuel while coasting in gear than while coasting in neutral (there is no fuel require to keep the engine turning, the vehicles' inertia takes care of that, hence why you slow down, compressing air in the cylinders with minimal addition of fuel.

diesel rigs use the technique all the time, though it is banned in a lot of towns 'cause of the noise factors.

if they aren't worried about transmission wear with those kinds of forces (yeah, i know, much bigger, stronger transmissions, but much more massive loads involved), and knowing how important reliability is for those guys, it can't be as bad as it's made out to be.

i'll continue to do it, and if i need new clutch packs i'll let you know.

LPg35coupe 11-26-2007 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by cimabeu
When I initially posted this question, I expected 4-5 answers with some level of detail-- at no point did I think that heat would replace light and that there would be more theory, conjecture and opinion than actual working knowledge.

This has been eye opening and leaves me with the sense that 50% of the folks here know something, 50% don't but think they do, another 50% know they know nothing but write in to throw in their -.000002 cents worth, 50% are lost, and the remaining 50% are standing by waiting for truth to emerge (Yep, I know all of these 50%'s are >100%-- but hey, it makes a point).

Soooooo-- does anyone really know the answer, unequivocally?

And finally, if this level of confusion exists with this one question, imagine how much more there is for the rest of the posts on this forum. And most importantly, how much misinformation is out there that car owners are making car decisions on
.

As you said, it's a forum. A discussion forum. So expect discussion. If you want a simple, quick answer then call up a transmission specialist.

harrisot 11-26-2007 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Let's say you are going down a big, steep hill. Then let's assume you downshift from 3rd to 2nd right at the limit of the shift parameters.

Are you saying that the force applied to the at's clutches/bands to slow the car down is significantly less than the force required to shift the gear up on a hard shift?

Yes, the torque that the clutches are attempting to transmit is dramatically lower when the car is slowing itself. It is because the negative torque that the wheels are driving back up through the drivetrain is much lower than the torque that the engine generates.

Let's talk specific hypothetical numbers. If your engine puts out 300Nm then the trans will see about 500Nm coming through at stall in first gear. The coast load would be around -30Nm.

harrisot 11-26-2007 01:47 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Well that's sort of the exception vs the rule IMHO. As all the G/Zs built from 03-06 do not have this feature and therefore will probably experience higher wear from attempting this.

A fair point given some component changes and an updated logic. However the basic architecture of the transmission will remain the same until they introduce their 7 speed.

Attachment 80434

ratm68 11-26-2007 01:48 PM

Since I have to downshift to be in the right gear to merge out of an exit ramp, i tend to downshift before entering instead of braking.

GeeWillikers 11-26-2007 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by cimabeu
When I initially posted this question, I expected 4-5 answers with some level of detail-- at no point did I think that heat would replace light and that there would be more theory, conjecture and opinion than actual working knowledge.

This has been eye opening and leaves me with the sense that 50% of the folks here know something, 50% don't but think they do, another 50% know they know nothing but write in to throw in their -.000002 cents worth, 50% are lost, and the remaining 50% are standing by waiting for truth to emerge (Yep, I know all of these 50%'s are >100%-- but hey, it makes a point).

Soooooo-- does anyone really know the answer, unequivocally?

And finally, if this level of confusion exists with this one question, imagine how much more there is for the rest of the posts on this forum. And most importantly, how much misinformation is out there that car owners are making car decisions on
.

If you really wanted to know the correct, factory endorsed answer, you might try reading the section of your manual that describes 'engine braking' for yourself. But hey, why do that when you can take advice from strangers on the Internet, and then criticize them for their responses?

:rolleyes:

You might also ask yourself why Infiniti designed the tranny with 'rev-matching' downshifts if they didn't intend the manumatic mode to be used in this fashion. The rev-matching is there to decrease the load or shock as the lower gear is engaged.

From the manual:


M4 (4th):
For driving up or down long slopes where
engine braking would be advantageous.

M3 (3rd) and M2 (2nd):
Use for hill climbing or engine braking on
downhill grades.

M1 (1st):
Use this position when climbing steep
hills slowly or driving slowly through
deep snow, or for maximum engine
braking
on steep downhill grades.
Done within reason, there is no harm in it. Considering this tranny is used in cars heavier and more powerful than the G, I can't see the additional wear (if any) being of that much consesquence.

Of course - anything taken to an extreme can cause extreme results, and there are exceptions to every rule.

GeeWillikers 11-26-2007 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by LPg35coupe
As you said, it's a forum. A discussion forum. So expect discussion. If you want a simple, quick answer then call up a transmission specialist.

Or look in your manual. :bowrofl:

ttrank 11-26-2007 02:06 PM

I downshift to slow down a lot. I have a good clutch and a very light flywheel which helps to make rev matching easy.

turbocad6 11-26-2007 02:28 PM

ah, no one knows what there talking about anyway.. but if you leave it in the garage & don't drive it, it'll last longer too, I think it says that in the manual too :BOUNCE:

Jeff92se 11-26-2007 02:34 PM

There wouldn't be any wear perse. At least not in the manner being discussed. Unless you were slipping the clutch quite a bit.


Originally Posted by ttrank
I downshift to slow down a lot. I have a good clutch and a very light flywheel which helps to make rev matching easy.


DaveB 11-26-2007 02:46 PM

Harmful to the tranny? Not really, but it will generate more heat and the killer of all autos is heat. The answer is downshifting to slow down will raise transmission fluid temps, but not to an alarming rates. You will also put more stress on the clutches, etc., but nothing substanial unless you're in the habit of going from 5th to 2nd at 50mph to slow down. In the end, you're probably going to need to replace the tranny fluid a little more often and you'll suck a little bit more life out of the tranny internals. That's about it. Like others have said, you won't use any additional fuel.

Now, my question is why do you want to this? There's really no purpose to it unless you're coming up to a turn and want the most control possible. I downshift on occasion to do this. But coming to a stop or as a method of slowing down, what's the point? IMO, just use the brakes. Even in my manual cars, I never used the tranny to slow down the car except when coming down from an excessive speed or going down a steep grade. Plus downshifting with a manual to slow the car is a bit more stressful to the tranny than an auto.

kevink 11-26-2007 08:02 PM

I downshift through school zones to help keep the idle from making me go too fast.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands