Aggressive Wheels & Stretched Tires: Post 'Em Up! [[Some NSFW]]
#1276
03-12-2009, 11:27 AM
i remember reading somewere that there would be no reason to have one of those camber plates ON the coilovers, because camber plates come on some coilovers but i remember reading that its useless for g35s
also I would do a cusco front (and rear if possible) from what I know cusco gives you the most amount of adjustability even more than spc
also I would do a cusco front (and rear if possible) from what I know cusco gives you the most amount of adjustability even more than spc
#1277
03-12-2009, 11:43 AM
I'm sorry but how do those people drive anywhere when they are dropped that low? Don't get me wrong i love the look but, where i live Tucson Arizona you couldn't make it a hour without scraping. S**t I'm not dropped that low and i cant get into half the places i try to go. Like where do they live and do they ever drive?
#1280
03-12-2009, 11:59 AM
Stance Suspension Company offers a new high quality monotube coilover for the Nissan 350Z. Utilizes a true coil over shock design for the rear, allowing for added rear camber adjustment. Monotube suspension offers many benefits over conventional twintube suspension. Oil and gas are completely separated, which results in precise dampening characteristics. The monotube design allows heat to dissipate much quicker. Inverted monotube design can resist extremely high lateral forces compared to an upright twintube suspension.
Now from what I understand is the lower you go the more camber you can achieve by reducing the vehicles ride height by itself without touching the camber plates or anything else related to the suspension. Again I could be wrong and all info is appreciated.
#1281
03-12-2009, 12:04 PM
^Correct!
Again the camber plates do not affect the camber what so ever, the camber plates are good if you are running alot of neg camber and big wheels. Say you have the plate adjusted all the way out towards the fender and you are running big wheels and alot of camber, there is a chance you will be hitting the coils. But you adjust the camber plate to give you more clearance between the coil and wheel/tire. That's why you are able to run more camber.
Again the camber plates do not affect the camber what so ever, the camber plates are good if you are running alot of neg camber and big wheels. Say you have the plate adjusted all the way out towards the fender and you are running big wheels and alot of camber, there is a chance you will be hitting the coils. But you adjust the camber plate to give you more clearance between the coil and wheel/tire. That's why you are able to run more camber.
#1282
03-12-2009, 12:05 PM
I'm sorry but how do those people drive anywhere when they are dropped that low? Don't get me wrong i love the look but, where i live Tucson Arizona you couldn't make it a hour without scraping. S**t I'm not dropped that low and i cant get into half the places i try to go. Like where do they live and do they ever drive?
Last edited by pch2005; 03-12-2009 at 12:32 PM.
#1283
03-12-2009, 01:50 PM
#1284
03-12-2009, 02:45 PM
I am about a +13 on a 12" wide rim
it pokes more than 10.5 or 11" at a +10 I wont be streched any more I need traction so I am going from a 19x10.5 up front with a 265 up to a 275 and from 19x12 rear with a 285 to a 305. I have yet to see if the tires will fit with my offsets though.
Last edited by Sylvan lake V35; 03-12-2009 at 02:53 PM.
#1287
03-12-2009, 06:46 PM
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: huntington beach
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never said -8 degree camber, i was referring to the -8 offset that you suggested. Yea, u can make anything fit, but in terms of look it wont look that great on a G. The z's can fit the rear a tad more aggressive. rolling on more than -4 camber is not a good look. Fitment is key not numbers. I agree with the front to be around -8 offset and you're golden. But the rears anything beyond -3 offset is not worth it.
because ultimately you're doing it for the look.
what is stock suspension with coilovers? never heard of it..stock camber arms u mean?
because ultimately you're doing it for the look.
what is stock suspension with coilovers? never heard of it..stock camber arms u mean?
#1288
03-12-2009, 10:22 PM
I had the 265s on the front with -2.5deg camber and there was tons of room so the 275s will fit easy I also have camber arms for the front coming so I will try it at -1.5 - -2deg camber. The rears might have to get pulled but I will try to get those 305s on there.
#1289
03-13-2009, 08:20 AM
I never said -8 degree camber, i was referring to the -8 offset that you suggested. Yea, u can make anything fit, but in terms of look it wont look that great on a G. The z's can fit the rear a tad more aggressive. rolling on more than -4 camber is not a good look. Fitment is key not numbers. I agree with the front to be around -8 offset and you're golden. But the rears anything beyond -3 offset is not worth it.
because ultimately you're doing it for the look.
what is stock suspension with coilovers? never heard of it..stock camber arms u mean?
because ultimately you're doing it for the look.
what is stock suspension with coilovers? never heard of it..stock camber arms u mean?
I see then sorry for the confusion about the -8 offset. Also I did not know how to word the suspension part but your right on what you said. That is what i meant.
