Lowered on H&R's, pictures soon!
#17
The WRX looks better .
Sorry I'm still a Subaru freak.
John: Did you consider getting an LGT before buying the G. Although i'm 80% sure I'll be getting the G35 every know and then I feel like buying another Subaru.
William
NASIOC member 239 (or something like that)
PS I miss my old bug-eye WRX wagon and my RS
Sorry I'm still a Subaru freak.
John: Did you consider getting an LGT before buying the G. Although i'm 80% sure I'll be getting the G35 every know and then I feel like buying another Subaru.
William
NASIOC member 239 (or something like that)
PS I miss my old bug-eye WRX wagon and my RS
#18
i just traded my bugeye in for a g35s yesterday. i considered the lgt as well, but when i sat in the drivers seat and the damn e-brake handle was jabbing me in the leg, i knew it wasn't the car for me. similar story in the is's. it seems most cars aren't made for tall people..
in any case, i'm lovin my new car
in any case, i'm lovin my new car
#19
Originally Posted by acidrane
looks very good, but i remember hikos car sitting a little higher?!?! or am i just imagining things?
Keep in mind there is 10mm more wheel gap between front and rear when we measured before lowering. The service manual says it is 7mm.
H&Rs published drop is 1.3 in front and 1.2 in back, but I have a hard time believing that because they use the same spring part number for 2006 and 2007 and the published drop is the same both years. My guess is the 2007 installation is actually a tiny bit lower than the 2006 install simply because the car is heavier.
Eibach production springs will drop the car 1.4” in front and 1.3” in back (already published in their webpage). The prototypes I had on my car had the front drop measured at 1.2”.
So … Eibach will lower the 2007 G35 0.1” more all the way around than H&R would. Can you really see 0.1”? And … if H&R is actually a tiny bit lower as I expect, the drop heights will be the same between Eibach and H&R. Since the drop heights are the same between the 2 manufacturers, us end users will have to base our purchase decision on other things for now.
I’ve heard from a fairly reliable source that Tein will be coming out with their springs shortly for those that want to wait and see what they do.
#21
#22
Originally Posted by kewltea
Ya it looks pretty slammed
I don't know about the others, but I have only bottomed out once on a fairly steep parking lot driveway. A stock Honda did the same thing after I got out though.
#24
Originally Posted by terrycs
I have to agree with the others that it may look low, but the ride quality has not changed and if anything, it got slightly better because both manufacturers use a progressive rate design vs a linear rate stock spring.
I don't know about the others, but I have only bottomed out once on a fairly steep parking lot driveway. A stock Honda did the same thing after I got out though.
I don't know about the others, but I have only bottomed out once on a fairly steep parking lot driveway. A stock Honda did the same thing after I got out though.
#25
#26
Originally Posted by CFar
Hmm, like many others said, it looks really low. Maybe a new wheel set with slightly smaller offsets ala railgunner who has a good looking car. Maybe its just because its OB
EDIT: BTW, the IP g35 in the bay area has the same offset that Railgunner has using 20x10, so it appears 285 is very possible.
Last edited by terrycs; 02-23-2007 at 08:54 PM.
#27
WOW! Looks HOT! But man that looks Kinda Low?! Curious to see how the Updated Eibach Springs Compare to this one? Or maybe it's because u used 06 G35 Spec Springs for an 07? I know the Springs and Suspension are similar, but maybe the spring rates are a little Higher for new Offical build 07 springs, which won't make it so Low? Just a thought...
#29
Originally Posted by John2.5RS
these are the 07 springs. it is low, but not too low, I like the looks and handling. I'll take better pictures soon!
BTW, according to their website H&R uses the same part number for 2003 through 2007.