Question about spring rate (lbs) for G35 Tein S-tech/H-tech

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 06:47 PM
  #1  
SGrice7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Question about spring rate (lbs) for G35 Tein S-tech/H-tech

Hey guys I'm in the process of buying some springs for my G35 to lower it about an inch, and I cannot seem to find the answer to my question about spring rates for the G35 Tein springs. Are the rear load rates going to be much softer than stock suspension rates, or are they going to be the same? I contacted Tein and this is response I received.

"Thank you for your interest in TEIN products. Our lowering spring kits
utilize a progressive design in that some coils are used purely to seat the
springs onto the assemblies, but function in a linear capacity once
installed.

As such, only one spring rate is provided. The High.Tech kit includes the
noted 325 lb. front springs with 263 lb. springs for the rear. From the
data we gathered at the time of testing, these rates are more aggressive
than the stock components.

For reference, all TEIN products are designed and tested in each of the
markets they are sold in to insure proper fitment and performance. The main
gain with use of our spring kits is aesthetic, in that a lower stance is
provided. For those seeking more performance oriented designs, our coilover
kits are recommended.

Use of the springs from the 350Z is not recommended as the spring design and
rates are not appropriate for your vehicle. To obtain the desired one inch
drop front and rear, our S.Tech kit (part # SKP30-AUB00) would be
recommended as it provides -1.2" drop for the front and -0.9" lowering for
the rear."


Does this mean that the load rates are going to be much softer? I do not want a soft suspension in the rear. If so, I'd be better going off with the 350z Tein springs. Also, is there another spring similar to Tein that anyone would recommend? I'm looking to lower my car as low as possible (about an inch) without eating tires. I'm willing to buy a rear camber kit if it's a must.

Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 05:05 PM
  #2  
Crovax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Sticky from this forum:

https://g35driver.com/forums/brakes-...w-updates.html

Lower spring rate = less stiff (it takes less pressure to compress the spring).
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 06:04 PM
  #3  
Q45tech's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,514
Likes: 5
From: Marietta, Georgia
Springs which are offset from the hub and wheel centerline confuse many inthat they are multiples of the actual wheel spring rate.

The tires and wheels [which are very very stiff] are in series with the coil springs [so are all the rubber seats and bushings THUS the real wheel rate is significantly softer than the published spring rate.

Engineers calculate the REAL wheel spring rate so that the spring ratio equals the body weight ratio. If the body weight is 54% front then the front springs together need to be 54%.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #4  
SGrice7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by Q45tech
Springs which are offset from the hub and wheel centerline confuse many inthat they are multiples of the actual wheel spring rate.

The tires and wheels [which are very very stiff] are in series with the coil springs [so are all the rubber seats and bushings THUS the real wheel rate is significantly softer than the published spring rate.

Engineers calculate the REAL wheel spring rate so that the spring ratio equals the body weight ratio. If the body weight is 54% front then the front springs together need to be 54%.
Thanks for the reply. So are you saying that the advertised rear spring rate of 263 lbs/in (real wheel rate) would be only 54% of the actual "spring ratio" (aka published spring rate) or that the advertised 263 lbs/in is the actual spring ratio (published rate) so the spring rate is less than 263 lbs/in?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2010 | 09:05 PM
  #5  
tiguy99's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,315
Likes: 30
From: Chicago
Okay I'm curious what the response is to Sgrice's question as well. Q45tech....please enlighten us.

I'm on the hunt for some coilovers or good spring setup myself
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
laksjd84
Steering & Suspension
16
Jul 12, 2017 12:22 AM
netcbc
Exterior - Body Parts CDN
2
Aug 21, 2015 09:50 AM
laksjd84
Exterior - Body Parts
1
Jul 24, 2015 05:12 PM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
Jul 24, 2015 11:25 AM
Scredeur4
Steering & Suspension
1
Jul 17, 2015 06:30 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.