05 G35C vs another new 05 or 06 mustang GT
#16
Originally Posted by Fassster10
Mustangs are HEAVY and SLOW as hell, they are just a lot of Hype even with so much advertising of 300HP that they so much preached..
#17
Originally Posted by Skyline_G35
2005 Ford Mustang GT 4.6L V8 5.1 13.5 (MT Jan 05)
2003 Infiniti G35 Coupe 5.5 14.2
2004 Nissan 350Z 5.3 13.77 (M.T. Mar '04)
I have a hard time believing that you beat a 05 Ford Mustang GT. They are running equivalant to the 350z in the quarter, maybe a little quicker. And they are quicker than our cars 0-60. Either you were racing a convertible or you shifted perfectly and the Mustang f'd up his shifting. I would really like to see anyone's 1/4 mile time that claim that they beat an 05 or 06 Mustang GT. Unless of course you are FI or have every bolt on mod out there.
2003 Infiniti G35 Coupe 5.5 14.2
2004 Nissan 350Z 5.3 13.77 (M.T. Mar '04)
I have a hard time believing that you beat a 05 Ford Mustang GT. They are running equivalant to the 350z in the quarter, maybe a little quicker. And they are quicker than our cars 0-60. Either you were racing a convertible or you shifted perfectly and the Mustang f'd up his shifting. I would really like to see anyone's 1/4 mile time that claim that they beat an 05 or 06 Mustang GT. Unless of course you are FI or have every bolt on mod out there.
#18
Originally Posted by ratedxmarcel
I have a hardtop coupe which is very light I have beaten about 3 350zs 2 were 6 speed and one was auto...its close with the 6speed 350s I only win by about a car 1/2 or less.
So let me get this right... 03 G35 sedan was lighter than the 03 G35 coupe, claimed less horsepower than the coupe and was just as quick at the track. Now the 05-06 G35 sedan was equal in weight to the 05-06 G35 coupe, also just as quick at the track. The quickest stock sedan in the 1/4 was by trey hutcheson at 13.79, which was in extremely awesome conditions. I have yet to hear any coupe running that stock, period!!! That 13.79 still isn't quick enough to beat the new Mustang GT. Until you get to the track, I'm calling BS, or maybe you really did beat that 90 year old lady in the automatic mustang .
Get real!
#19
Originally Posted by 350_Z
Being that the G was an 06, wouldn't the extra 18 hp have helped out vs the 280hp 2003 G35. Seems like the 05/06 G35 should be around the same as an 03/04 350z, maybe a tenth or so slower.
#20
Originally Posted by Skyline_G35
The quickest stock sedan in the 1/4 was by trey hutcheson at 13.79, which was in extremely awesome conditions. I have yet to hear any coupe running that stock, period!!!
And BTW - I'm not stock. I've got cats, mrev, ztube, k&n, and the stillen exhaust. They haven't really dyno'd that well on my car, but still, it wouldn't be fair to claim that I'm stock. When I ran that time, I had the ztube, k&n, and the cats.
#21
#22
Originally Posted by trey.hutcheson
Thanks for the mention, but I'm not the fastest sedan. Check out ZXIMan. And one of the coupes in the National G Club has posted better times than me. I don't know how stock he was either. But he ran a 13.7@102 flat.
And BTW - I'm not stock. I've got cats, mrev, ztube, k&n, and the stillen exhaust. They haven't really dyno'd that well on my car, but still, it wouldn't be fair to claim that I'm stock. When I ran that time, I had the ztube, k&n, and the cats.
And BTW - I'm not stock. I've got cats, mrev, ztube, k&n, and the stillen exhaust. They haven't really dyno'd that well on my car, but still, it wouldn't be fair to claim that I'm stock. When I ran that time, I had the ztube, k&n, and the cats.
#23
#26
Originally Posted by Skyline_G35
A hardtop coupe??? Does the coupe come any other way???
So let me get this right... 03 G35 sedan was lighter than the 03 G35 coupe, claimed less horsepower than the coupe and was just as quick at the track. Now the 05-06 G35 sedan was equal in weight to the 05-06 G35 coupe, also just as quick at the track. The quickest stock sedan in the 1/4 was by trey hutcheson at 13.79, which was in extremely awesome conditions. I have yet to hear any coupe running that stock, period!!! That 13.79 still isn't quick enough to beat the new Mustang GT. Until you get to the track, I'm calling BS, or maybe you really did beat that 90 year old lady in the automatic mustang .
Get real!
So let me get this right... 03 G35 sedan was lighter than the 03 G35 coupe, claimed less horsepower than the coupe and was just as quick at the track. Now the 05-06 G35 sedan was equal in weight to the 05-06 G35 coupe, also just as quick at the track. The quickest stock sedan in the 1/4 was by trey hutcheson at 13.79, which was in extremely awesome conditions. I have yet to hear any coupe running that stock, period!!! That 13.79 still isn't quick enough to beat the new Mustang GT. Until you get to the track, I'm calling BS, or maybe you really did beat that 90 year old lady in the automatic mustang .
Get real!
#27
#28
Originally Posted by ratedxmarcel
hardtop as in no sunroof no bs accessories that I dont need...get it? good....the guy was young it all comes down to driver so get real jackass
Accesories that you don't need or is it that you can't afford??? Why didn't you just get the Evo if you didn't want unnecessary accesories.
#29