utec TUNED!
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,942
Likes: 7
From: PNW in Washington
6MT Coupe
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the general consenses is that Mustangs read low, Dyna Paks read high and Dyno Jets read in the middle of previous two mentioned and thats why most ppl use Dyno Jets...middle of the road in hp/tq readings.
The problem with most non-dynojet dynos are the custom correction factors. Dynapaks can read higher than dynojets, dyno dynamics lower, but it all depends on the shop. Some owners/operators like to try to correct to "standard dynojet" numbers, but they're never accurate.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Hello,
I have an AT 04 Sedan. I took my car to FyneTune in Miami, FL (next to Tamiami Airport) and I got 229 rwhp. At that time I had the following: AEM Cold Air Intake, Kinetix SSV Manifold, Stillen ST HEaders. Then, I purchased a Stillen Cat Back Exhaust Gen2 and I took it to another Dyno by 107 Ave and 8 ST SW. At that time I got 260 rwhp. However, I just took it to a Mustang Dynometer to have my UTEC configured and I got only 201 rwhp on my baseline.
I have an AT 04 Sedan. I took my car to FyneTune in Miami, FL (next to Tamiami Airport) and I got 229 rwhp. At that time I had the following: AEM Cold Air Intake, Kinetix SSV Manifold, Stillen ST HEaders. Then, I purchased a Stillen Cat Back Exhaust Gen2 and I took it to another Dyno by 107 Ave and 8 ST SW. At that time I got 260 rwhp. However, I just took it to a Mustang Dynometer to have my UTEC configured and I got only 201 rwhp on my baseline.
My question would be why did they cut the baseline run short at 5,900rpms and then tuned run qwas taken to fuel cut? The car clearly gained power with the tune, but most of us know that VQ35DE peaks at ~6200rpms. The "gains" appear to be overstated because the first run was cut so short. Regardless, the UTEC definitely helped things.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
