Why the HP Difference between the MT and AT cars?

 

AT more drivetrain loss compare to MT.

 

nothing that should impact your decision to buy one vs the other

 

So technically engines are producing same crank HP? why is it stated differently on all web sites?

 

mostly marketing purposes.

 

^^ Other than that there the same!

 

AT has more TQ

 

ATs are just slow @ss slugs that have no business in the same sentence as performance!

Geez I don’t even know why people by those POS!!! Especially the sedans!


I have no sig anymore, so some people might not get it

 

I'm surprised at the responses so far. Yes, they produce different HP and TQ values. The simple answer is the MT has the REVUP engine that has differences in at least the intake and probably cam timing (don't really know). As for if one is better than the other, well, now you can start doing your research.

 

Finally

 

the only difference is between a revup motor and non revup is the power drop off after its 6200rpm peak power. It has more linear drop off compared to non-revup's more drastic drop. At the same time they generally make less midrange tq. That is of coarse if you research.

 

he asked the diff between MT and AT... not revup vs non-revup... all MTs are not rev ups.

 

i'm sure it was a typo you meant to say all ATs are not rev ups.

 

no - I meant to say all MTs are not rev-ups... and they are not.

It was in direct response to the post tagged.

 

I guess what you're trying to say is that the transmission itself is not a rev-up engine...