Whats so great about this car?
#31
Originally Posted by N50
Don't forget to push the "8-year-olds" on their swings.
Seriously, this "hyundai looking" crossover is one of the nicest crossovers inside and out in its class, on the market. Yes, it isn't as performance oriented as many of the other Infiniti offerings but the target market for the EX isn't the same as the G... or FX for that matter. The EX should be given credit where it is due.
Seriously, this "hyundai looking" crossover is one of the nicest crossovers inside and out in its class, on the market. Yes, it isn't as performance oriented as many of the other Infiniti offerings but the target market for the EX isn't the same as the G... or FX for that matter. The EX should be given credit where it is due.
I agree with you about the EX.
#32
Originally Posted by ninous26
Ok.. Sure, I admit that I can say I wish i had an HR motor.. I'm fine with my interior.
This car is still the least desirable car made by infiniti.
This car is still the least desirable car made by infiniti.
Last edited by Garnet Canuck; 03-25-2008 at 08:55 PM.
#33
#34
#35
#36
#37
Originally Posted by ninous26
LOL... touche.
But I'm sure if there was a random survey of 1000 people on which infiniti to choose, the EX would be the least picked.
But I'm sure if there was a random survey of 1000 people on which infiniti to choose, the EX would be the least picked.
#38
Originally Posted by bruddahmanmatt
Meh, I dunno. Infiniti caters to a lot of "drivers" and even though the EX is a bit of a chickee mobile, - ok...it's a full blown chickee mobile - it's the most driver oriented vehicle in its segment including the X3 and RDX IMO. The only thing it's missing is a set of paddle shifters. With that being said, if there's one Infiniti vehicle that doesn't cater to "drivers" at all, it's the QX56. Yes it's a beast and yes it's got some punch for such a large vehicle, but let's not BS ourselves into thinking that a gussied up Armada is anything more than what it really is. Comfortable the QX56 is, corner carver it most certainly is not.
#39
Originally Posted by bruddahmanmatt
Meh, I dunno. Infiniti caters to a lot of "drivers" and even though the EX is a bit of a chickee mobile, - ok...it's a full blown chickee mobile - it's the most driver oriented vehicle in its segment including the X3 and RDX IMO. The only thing it's missing is a set of paddle shifters. With that being said, if there's one Infiniti vehicle that doesn't cater to "drivers" at all, it's the QX56. Yes it's a beast and yes it's got some punch for such a large vehicle, but let's not BS ourselves into thinking that a gussied up Armada is anything more than what it really is. Comfortable the QX56 is, corner carver it most certainly is not.
#40
#43
Originally Posted by ninous26
Ok.. Sure, I admit that I can say I wish i had an HR motor.. I'm fine with my interior.
This car is still the least desirable car made by infiniti.
This car is still the least desirable car made by infiniti.
Hey, I think it's a decent looking small SUV....and I think the #'s are very impressive for something that's stock!
Based on Car & Driver's test of the Infiniti EX35, it outperforms its competitors. 0-60 mph time in the All Wheel Drive Model is 6.2 seconds, much better than the BMW X3's 7.1 seconds. The quarter mile is 14.6 seconds at 98 miles per hour (158 km/h), and top speed (Gov. limit) is 144 mph (232 km/h). 70 mph (110 km/h) - 0 braking is a short 166 feet (51 m), shorter than the Pontiac G8 GT (a sports sedan). The Roadholding is .83g's.
#44
As an Infiniti owner myself I still don't understand why anyone would go for this model. If you want a good performing car, get the g coupe or the sedan for that matter...if you want an SUV or crossover get the fx. This car is much too small to be considered anywhere near an "SUV" and I sure don't see the "crossover" part of it either. Couldn't even fit a bicycle inside it. Not sure what they are aiming for here. Interior is sweet, but why own a taller g?? Just doesn't make sense.