Lmao... Srt-4
#16
Originally Posted by Fassster10
SRT4 having more power than a G stock? who ever heard of that?? Now a SRT4 already come supercharged, a G is just plain stock, if both cars came supercharged the SRT4 would not stand a chance. Lets stop and think here, SRT4 made by Dodge, i dont know about you guys but when it comes to quality id take Nissan/Infiniti over Dodge any day of the year...SRT4 is overrated as its a cheap thrill, perfect if you wanna just beat up on a racing car without going broke...but no way can compare to our G IMO
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v291/kdogg937/smilies/eye-popin.gif)
I personally don't like SRT-4's at all because I think they are just plain ugly (just my opinion). Add that many, if not most, are driven by obnoxious people (at least that act obnoxious while driving) and the SRT-4 becomes a car I absolutely cannot stand.
That being said... they are fast and they are cheap. I certainly understand why people who want the most speed for their money would be interested in one.
#17
i cant stand ground with this comment, but ive been told g35's vs srt 4 stock for stock, srt's lose.....
with that being said, your making it seem like the g35 is slow......compared to your moded 400hp srt 4? sure, but im sorry....send your car to vrt, pay the money...get it done right.....and the g35 will compete with any other car out there that is not an exotic, or a 2000hp drag strip car.
with that being said, your making it seem like the g35 is slow......compared to your moded 400hp srt 4? sure, but im sorry....send your car to vrt, pay the money...get it done right.....and the g35 will compete with any other car out there that is not an exotic, or a 2000hp drag strip car.
#18
Originally Posted by Otacon132
i cant stand ground with this comment, but ive been told g35's vs srt 4 stock for stock, srt's lose.....
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Originally Posted by Otacon132
with that being said, your making it seem like the g35 is slow......compared to your moded 400hp srt 4? sure, but im sorry....send your car to vrt, pay the money...get it done right.....and the g35 will compete with any other car out there that is not an exotic, or a 2000hp drag strip car.
G35 is slow, I dont know why people think its fast. Sure its a very nice car and thats why I purchased it. Ive beaten a couple buillt tt 350z's with video proof and I had a $1700 turbo kit.
#19
Originally Posted by Sxt-Rich
Sorry to disappoint you, but whoever you got your info from is wrong and this is from personal experience not that I heard from someone.
G35 is slow, I dont know why people think its fast. Sure its a very nice car and thats why I purchased it. Ive beaten a couple buillt tt 350z's with video proof and I had a $1700 turbo kit.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
G35 is slow, I dont know why people think its fast. Sure its a very nice car and thats why I purchased it. Ive beaten a couple buillt tt 350z's with video proof and I had a $1700 turbo kit.
Turbo charged engine = Easy HP
NA engine = Expensive hard HP
#23
Originally Posted by rjcs03
yeah... dollar to hp ratio srt will win... but when we g owners parks all girls are lookin
... and when srt parks......![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Cool](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![EEK!](https://g35driver.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#25
i'll buy for looks and QUALITY way before I buy for speed....the fact the G doesnt respond to bolt-ons just means its tuned to near peak performance from the factory....the SRT4 and Mustangs arent...hence they're cheaper and mods will add much more HP until u get to 75k miles and the car falls apart
#28
its pointless to compare our cars. and its also pointless to keep generalizing. neons will always be neons but it is definitely a very fast car for the price.
ps besides having the ugliest spoiler, they dont even have rear power windows. imports ftw!
ps besides having the ugliest spoiler, they dont even have rear power windows. imports ftw!
#29
Originally Posted by w0ady
its pointless to compare our cars. and its also pointless to keep generalizing. neons will always be neons but it is definitely a very fast car for the price.
+1 But if I had to spend 20k to get an 11 sec car (is it even that fast??), I'd rather get a civic or dsm, and make it go faster.... since its cheaper that way too, and you aren't driving around a neon...
#30
Originally Posted by 2slo2bfurious
+1 But if I had to spend 20k to get an 11 sec car (is it even that fast??), I'd rather get a civic or dsm, and make it go faster.... since its cheaper that way too, and you aren't driving around a neon...
different people have different wants in life. we grew past the simply going fast and opted for quality as well as speed. we didnt settle but im happy with my choice and thats what matters.