Supercharger or turbocharger
https://g35driver.com/forums/search.php
That ought to be your new best friend for a lil while.... or this
That ought to be your new best friend for a lil while.... or this
Originally Posted by Fassster10
turbocharger for sure, well IMO they stress the engine less and produce better results...do research and see what its more for you!!! good luck
and this topic has been debated to 
OP: please search...each one has pros and cons and you need to pick one to suit your needs and wants
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 0
From: Gaithersburg
Originally Posted by stevenwxw
I am thinking to put Supercharger or turbocharger on my G. Which one is better? and what's the price range for both?
Thanks
Thanks
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by b00stedjustin
turbo's are vastly superior and more reliable, but a little more complicated. sp are easy to use, give you direct throtle response in terms of boost, but tend to break when pushed and you're pretty much stuck with a standard power level with not much room for extra psi.
Many, many, many variables in this evaluation.
1. How much can you spend?
2. What are your goals for hp(which will depend on your budget)?
3. Daily Driver or not?
For starters...Then you should go over these questions with a reputable shop thats going to do the work.
Good luck...no matter what BOOSTED is great.
1. How much can you spend?
2. What are your goals for hp(which will depend on your budget)?
3. Daily Driver or not?
For starters...Then you should go over these questions with a reputable shop thats going to do the work.
Good luck...no matter what BOOSTED is great.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 443
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
simply put:
Turbos are expensive, more difficult to install because of the exhaust plumbing, big boost has lag, add more heat in the engine bay compared to superchargers...however they cause less parasitic loss and are therefore more efficient.
Superchargers only have one negative compared to turbos, they use more HP to run. They are cheaper, less complicated, no lag, more durable (don't give me the diesel argument...diesels run at much lower RPMs), and some even come with a warranty (stillen roots).
Turbos are expensive, more difficult to install because of the exhaust plumbing, big boost has lag, add more heat in the engine bay compared to superchargers...however they cause less parasitic loss and are therefore more efficient.
Superchargers only have one negative compared to turbos, they use more HP to run. They are cheaper, less complicated, no lag, more durable (don't give me the diesel argument...diesels run at much lower RPMs), and some even come with a warranty (stillen roots).
Originally Posted by joe603
simply put:
Turbos are expensive, more difficult to install because of the exhaust plumbing, big boost has lag, add more heat in the engine bay compared to superchargers...however they cause less parasitic loss and are therefore more efficient.
Turbos are expensive, more difficult to install because of the exhaust plumbing, big boost has lag, add more heat in the engine bay compared to superchargers...however they cause less parasitic loss and are therefore more efficient.
Big boost might have lag but so would sizing a Vortech for big boost. Heat. I think you are pretty correct there. Same with the efficency
Superchargers only have one negative compared to turbos, they use more HP to run. They are cheaper, less complicated, no lag, more durable (don't give me the diesel argument...diesels run at much lower RPMs), and some even come with a warranty (stillen roots).