Completely Lost
Its pretty simple
1- all F/I will wear out your motor sooner
2- all F/I will blow the motor if not tuned right
3- some F/I kits need more than what comes with the kit to keep it from blowing the motor
4- TT kits have a better chance of blowing the motor ....tuned or not tuned...because of the extra trq. put on the motor lower in the rpm band
1- all F/I will wear out your motor sooner
2- all F/I will blow the motor if not tuned right
3- some F/I kits need more than what comes with the kit to keep it from blowing the motor
4- TT kits have a better chance of blowing the motor ....tuned or not tuned...because of the extra trq. put on the motor lower in the rpm band
Everyones giving me complete opposite opinions and stories on F/I mods.......Sounds more like i need to research into depth on all this by myself...Once i actually do my research and i know what i want i'll do my best to post everything i know on a new thread later so anyone curious about TT, single Turbo, or SC's can have some sort of solid foundation on the understandings of all this. Might take a while but i'll definitely keep my word on this. Once again thanks for everyones help but i think it might be better to find things out on my own from actual facts straight out of books, not to say anyone on this forum is wrong but if im going to spend 10-20 G's on a part, i want to know in depth exactly what im getting myself into.
Originally Posted by booger
Its pretty simple
4- TT kits have a better chance of blowing the motor ....tuned or not tuned...because of the extra trq. put on the motor lower in the rpm band
4- TT kits have a better chance of blowing the motor ....tuned or not tuned...because of the extra trq. put on the motor lower in the rpm band
By that definition ST kits should be even worse since their torque curve is even more steep.
Originally Posted by booger
Its pretty simple
2- all F/I will blow the motor if not tuned right
2- all F/I will blow the motor if not tuned right
Now that is dead on.
As I said above my Stillen kit had way more detonation issues than my TT kit. That IS what will blow your motor, not low end torque.
Originally Posted by booger
Its pretty simple
1- all F/I will wear out your motor sooner
2- all F/I will blow the motor if not tuned right
3- some F/I kits need more than what comes with the kit to keep it from blowing the motor
4- TT kits have a better chance of blowing the motor ....tuned or not tuned...because of the extra trq. put on the motor lower in the rpm band
1- all F/I will wear out your motor sooner
2- all F/I will blow the motor if not tuned right
3- some F/I kits need more than what comes with the kit to keep it from blowing the motor
4- TT kits have a better chance of blowing the motor ....tuned or not tuned...because of the extra trq. put on the motor lower in the rpm band
Originally Posted by Jae_K
it'll give me just as much HP and torque a TT would.
I won't go as far as to say that I've seen as many blown SC engines as I have with TTs and STs. I've been FI for two years and all the data I've seen state otherwise. At any rate, the best tune in the world can't combat fatigue in internal components that were not designed for boost. With that said, these motors is NA form are designed to go well over 100k miles. Don't expect any FI application to match the reliability of a stock engine. Yes, I have 96k on my Vortech, but the engine isn't going to last as long as if I were stock. Lastly, do not FI your car without money for a build. Remmber, your powertrain warranty goes bye-bye with most FI applications.
OEM rarely choose superchargers because their life is frequently shorter than the worst power train warranty 3 year/36k period.
The ones that do use Eaton type Axials which might last 60-70k even 100k.
Nissan had lots of experiences with 280-300zxtt and they know how bad most owners are in preventative mainteance limiting life.
A good education is to examine the 300zx/J30 engine vs the changes Nissan made to twin turbo it. But that was only to 300 HP. There are few models of long term supercharger reliability to emulate in oem.
The ones that do use Eaton type Axials which might last 60-70k even 100k.
Nissan had lots of experiences with 280-300zxtt and they know how bad most owners are in preventative mainteance limiting life.
A good education is to examine the 300zx/J30 engine vs the changes Nissan made to twin turbo it. But that was only to 300 HP. There are few models of long term supercharger reliability to emulate in oem.
Last edited by Q45tech; Mar 21, 2008 at 12:27 PM.
Originally Posted by ttrank
By that definition ST kits should be even worse since their torque curve is even more steep.
Now that is dead on.
As I said above my Stillen kit had way more detonation issues than my TT kit. That IS what will blow your motor, not low end torque.
Now that is dead on.
As I said above my Stillen kit had way more detonation issues than my TT kit. That IS what will blow your motor, not low end torque.
your situation with the Stillen SC was probably a rare one . Your tune didnt pull enough timing or didnt supply enough fuel or both . This caused your detonation and in most cases [ like mine ] breaks a piece or pieces of the cylinder off . ATI's SC didnt come with ANY timing control and did the same thing on alot of motors .
With a ST kit , the trq curve comes on later in the rpm range , so it has less of a chance of bending or breaking the rods .
The TT brings on the trq so low in the rpm range the rods bend or break . The safest TT kit on a stock motor would be to run low boost to keep the trq lower .
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
I won't go as far as to say that I've seen as many blown SC engines as I have with TTs and STs. I've been FI for two years and all the data I've seen state otherwise. At any rate, the best tune in the world can't combat fatigue in internal components that were not designed for boost. With that said, these motors is NA form are designed to go well over 100k miles. Don't expect any FI application to match the reliability of a stock engine. Yes, I have 96k on my Vortech, but the engine isn't going to last as long as if I were stock. Lastly, do not FI your car without money for a build. Remmber, your powertrain warranty goes bye-bye with most FI applications.
I agree.
The turbo kits got a bad name with the base Greddy and Turbonetics because they came with crappy engine management solutions. Since most people now get a UTEC or better the amount of issues is much lower.
There is no such thing as SAFE FI
only varying degrees of risk.
Do the searches before you spend money [on something you may not be able to afford]. Here's what you will find. (This was true when the G35 first came out and it is true now.)
If you install FI on a stock engine, it is likely that it will fail. Did you get that word - LIKELY?
A few guys get lucky and go a while before the engine blows and some blow right away. But for most, it is just a matter of time.
How many posts about blown OEM engines do we need before we get the message? OEM rods can't handle FI.
And when your engine blows, where will you be? Stop and think about it. You'll be in debt with a car you can't drive and can't afford to fix! I know that because if you can't afford a built engine now, you definitely won't have the money to replace your engine after you get the bill for the FI install.
I want FI on my car as much as anyone, but I'm realistic. A properly done FI project (turbo of course) is AT LEAST a $20,000 proposition and, if it's done right the first time, it will be pushing $30,000. There are realities that won't go away just because you don't want to think about them - engine management, gauges, cooling, exhaust, suspension, wheels, tires, tranny, etc., etc.
Recently, I saw a billboard that struck me as ludicrous. Some casino was boasting about a 97% return. There it is, reality right in your face. And it's presented as something positive! I'm thinkin' what idiot would invest their money in a portfolio that guaranteed a return of 97%???
If you install FI on a stock engine, your percentages will be a lot lower than that!
There's a reason the GTR has a $75,000 window sticker - the factory did it right the first time. And they are not like us who have to throw away a lot of expensive stuff that came with the car when we bought it only to rebuild it the way we need it to be.
Sure, FI is a rush. But before you jump into it, make sure you have the necessary resources in hand, not just in that imagination that fools us all.
Do the searches before you spend money [on something you may not be able to afford]. Here's what you will find. (This was true when the G35 first came out and it is true now.)
If you install FI on a stock engine, it is likely that it will fail. Did you get that word - LIKELY?
A few guys get lucky and go a while before the engine blows and some blow right away. But for most, it is just a matter of time.
How many posts about blown OEM engines do we need before we get the message? OEM rods can't handle FI.
And when your engine blows, where will you be? Stop and think about it. You'll be in debt with a car you can't drive and can't afford to fix! I know that because if you can't afford a built engine now, you definitely won't have the money to replace your engine after you get the bill for the FI install.
I want FI on my car as much as anyone, but I'm realistic. A properly done FI project (turbo of course) is AT LEAST a $20,000 proposition and, if it's done right the first time, it will be pushing $30,000. There are realities that won't go away just because you don't want to think about them - engine management, gauges, cooling, exhaust, suspension, wheels, tires, tranny, etc., etc.
Recently, I saw a billboard that struck me as ludicrous. Some casino was boasting about a 97% return. There it is, reality right in your face. And it's presented as something positive! I'm thinkin' what idiot would invest their money in a portfolio that guaranteed a return of 97%???
If you install FI on a stock engine, your percentages will be a lot lower than that!
There's a reason the GTR has a $75,000 window sticker - the factory did it right the first time. And they are not like us who have to throw away a lot of expensive stuff that came with the car when we bought it only to rebuild it the way we need it to be.
Sure, FI is a rush. But before you jump into it, make sure you have the necessary resources in hand, not just in that imagination that fools us all.
Last edited by exagorazo; Apr 26, 2008 at 01:15 PM. Reason: forgot something
Originally Posted by Jae_K
Alright so first i went from small modification plans for my G35 coupe, then i decided to just get with TT's bc it is said that is completely safe and it'll get my hp up to about 450. I talked to someone at the infiniti dealership and he asked me why i was going for a TT bc in the long run it is NOT good for your car it'll slowly eat away at your engine and some other stuff i don't remember what. I told him i wanted to be very cautious with what i do to my car bc i want this thing to last me a long time bc i LOVE my car, he told me to just go with the supercharger MUCH more safe and no harm done in short terms or long term AND it'll give me just as much HP and torque a TT would. Just wanted to know if this was true, and if it is then i got a WHOLE lot more research to do................AGAIN! If there is anyone who knows a lot of information on TT's and SC's could you please help me out i am completely lost, i need to know the pro's and con's of each.




