The G-Spot General discussion about the G Series;
G35 & G37, Coupes & Sedans
View Poll Results: If not G35, then what?
3-series/M3
185
61.26%
CTS/CTS-V
19
6.29%
A4/S4
32
10.60%
C-class/C55 AMG
15
4.97%
TSX
8
2.65%
Other (please state)
43
14.24%
Voters: 302. You may not vote on this poll

If not a G35, then what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #16  
ryn996's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
BMW 330 or the soon to be released 335i for me. I've driven the current M3 and was not impressed with the harsh ride and rough SMG transmission. My wife has an 04 325i and it has a better handling feel than my G35 coupe. Also, you can barely tell when it changes gears, even when flooring it. In my opinion no one makes a car that feels as good, as far as handling goes, as BMW.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #17  
filipm's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
cts-v is at best mediocre compared to the s4/m3. While its geared towards that competition it really lacks. The interior is kind of cheap... the car is heavy... and its just un inspiring. I got to drive the cts-v's/xlr's before they came out a couple years ago and they are cool but overpriced and like i said they really really really just cant compete with the m3/s4 caliber cars.

my 2 cents....

F
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 02:47 PM
  #18  
bull3t's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
From: LOS ANGELES
i would've got the c5 z06.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 03:10 PM
  #19  
Msedanman's Avatar
O.F. Administrator
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,341
Likes: 9
From: Cambridge, Ont. Canada
Originally Posted by bull3t
i would've got the c5 z06.
+1...sweet.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #20  
BoostedIS300's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Is350
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 03:18 PM
  #21  
hwa's Avatar
hwa
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: MD
probably TSX, because of Acura reliability. And the thing is loaded with mucho gadgets if you're willing to shell out the dough for them. A4 would have been another contender, but used since i'm on a budget. IS250 was another possibility since I consider it now to be the definitive luxury vehicle (just sit in one and you'll know what i mean....), but it drives like a little old lady on a motorized cart. Would go for the IS350 if i could afford it
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #22  
BoostedIS300's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
^^ I know what you mean the interior of the 250 and 350 are extremely nice and they have the camera in the back so you can watch the tv screen as your backing up..
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #23  
(>")> G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: 626
Turthly would have been a TL, because it was the only japanese car in the same price bracket range with similar features. I am beyond glad I didn't get a TL, my family already has three accords, no more honda products. I took a look at the IS350 and M3, but both were way over the price of the G35 and smaller.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #24  
truplay8's Avatar
THE BATMOBILE
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,671
Likes: 0
From: South Florida / Madison WI
GTO..........so fast
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #25  
nosey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Rs4..no reason needed
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #26  
5150DS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,984
Likes: 162
From: So Cal
Not out yet, but the Shelby GT500. 500 hp for around 40 grand.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #27  
Amarao's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Lotus Exige ~D:
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 08:39 AM
  #28  
Captain Baller's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by filipm
cts-v is at best mediocre compared to the s4/m3. While its geared towards that competition it really lacks. The interior is kind of cheap... the car is heavy... and its just un inspiring. I got to drive the cts-v's/xlr's before they came out a couple years ago and they are cool but overpriced and like i said they really really really just cant compete with the m3/s4 caliber cars.

my 2 cents....

F
I dont find this very true at all the xlr-v is a badass car. The m3 and xlr just dont even compare... dont get me wrong i love the m3, but the xlr just is way sexier and faster, I think it would out perform the m3..havn't ever seen someone rip *** in one though. My dads cts-v is freakin baller in no way is the thing cheap...styling is jsut amazing i mean in a sence its a m5..
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #29  
Captain Baller's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by nosey
Rs4..no reason needed
Rs4 = awesome
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 09:21 AM
  #30  
gto2050's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
From: NJ
I was pricing out an 03 330Ci and the price tag went over $46K and the G was $35K. Easy choice plus the BMW dealer never called me back.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.