G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

New Dyno Numbers!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 02:17 AM
  #16  
Casetay's Avatar
1ClssyG
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I'm getting a new car...
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 04:08 AM
  #17  
markiev37's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: silicon valley
My mods are pretty similar except that I have a rev-up. 6mt and dynoed on a dynojet...Numbers are 255hp and 248 torque....Our #'s are pretty close..


Originally Posted by vpannu
Hey everyone, just wanted to share my new dyno numbers after I added a Fuji Exhaust. On a side note I was doing 80 and slam it into 4th and the slip light came on, so I'm pretty happy with the torque =)

Conditions: 66F, 30.05hg, Humidity 43%, and SAE.99
Max Power = 249.69
Max Torque = 242.81

Here's a list of mods and any input on how to improve these numbers even more would be awesome!

JWT Popcharger
V5 Plenum
Unichip
Crawford HF cats
Strup Headers
Fuji Exahust
JWT Clutch/Flywheel
Stillen Sways
KDW Tires
Slotted Brembo Rotors
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 05:50 AM
  #18  
driftGT350's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
From: heart of 626 bad drivers
damn this makes me not wanna dyno my car lol... i don't want bad numbers =\
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #19  
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Geesh, you can't compare dyno numbers. He never said what dyno was used. Could've been a Mustang or DynaPak, which read much lower than DynaJets.
 

Last edited by Deang35c6; Mar 23, 2007 at 07:36 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #20  
vpannu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
i looked it up, it's on a dynajet dyno
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #21  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
Geesh, you can't compare dyno numbers. He never said what dyno was used. Could've been a Mustang or DynaPak, which read much lower than DynaJets.
dynapak reads 15-20 hp higher than dynojet not lower.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #22  
markiev37's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: silicon valley
Numbers are just that....The proof is in the pull of the car....I love how my car pulls and again and happy with my numbers...In a couple of years and after this oil consumption issue is figured out I will slap a Vortech on my baby and my a new lsd.....


Originally Posted by driftGT350
damn this makes me not wanna dyno my car lol... i don't want bad numbers =\
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #23  
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
dynapak reads 15-20 hp higher than dynojet not lower.

Actually, one DynaPak reads higher than Dynajet. Hint: begins with c and ends with s
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #24  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
Originally Posted by Deang35c6
Actually, one DynaPak reads higher than Dynajet. Hint: begins with c and ends with s
Really? That's interesting. Hydrazine has posted about how he had his dynapack calibrated to match Church's.

But in general, Dynapacks will read higher. Dynapacks bolt to the rear hubs, as opposed to the car being strapped to a drum of fixed mass, like on the dynojet. So it would make sense that dynapacks would read higher.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #25  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
vpannu,
I would advise you to ignore those that are suggesting the numbers seem low, even considering your mods.

From personal experience, with similar mods I picked up around 25hp at peak. I'm only putting down 265peak, but I started higher than you because of my revup(baselined at 242hp).

People seem to think that all those mods should magically add up to 40 or 50p, and that's just wrong. But, it's not the peak numbers that matter. For example, even though I've only managed to pick up maybe 25hp at peak, I've picked up 40 ft-lbs of torque at 4k rpms.

Some others have mentioned that you need to take it to the track. I agree. Go to a track and get a good 5 clean runs in. Then post back here with your trap speeds. That will tell you more about the power you're making.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #26  
vpannu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
awesome thanks for the insight, and i agree i am going to take it to the track in two weeks and get there early so i can get a few nice runs.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 06:42 PM
  #27  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Agreed with Trey.

Potential Trap speeds can tell you alot about the power you are making.

And without a baseline dyno (stock), your numbers are meaningless.

.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #28  
trey.hutcheson's Avatar
Staff Alumni
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,521
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham AL
I've got some more information that should poke a few more holes in the idea of judging dyno numbers.

The wife and I attended the dyno day and car show at Z1 today in Georgia, as part of the ZNationals event. I put my car on the dyno(a dynojet), and it put down 250hp peak on the first pull, and 253.98 peak on the second pull(only got two pulls).

On the DynoDynamics at Sharif's, this same configuration put down 246hp peak. 4 Hours later and almost 300 miles away, the same car put down 263hp peak on a dynojet. One week later, at another dynojet, it put down 265.67.

My car has had over 50 pulls on 5 different dynos. Dyno numbers can be affected by tire pressure in the driven wheels, gear ratios, how a car is strapped; in other words, way too many factors. So don't be concerned if people are telling your numbers are low.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 09:29 PM
  #29  
urban's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 72
From: California
The numbers are pretty consistent with others I have seen and I know who did your dyno and he always produces lower numbers than others I have dynoed on myself. I myself dynoed my car there twice and then went to a local one near me and got a few ponies higher.
Bottom line is no two dynos will produce the same number but also not even the same dyno will give you the same number on a different day Take it to the track and just see what she does, that is where you can judge yourself if the mods made a difference.
Hope you enjoy the Fuji as much as I did
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #30  
vpannu's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
thanks trey and paul, yeah i can't wait to get it on the track in two weeks and see what she does. And the fuji exhaust I love, my cousin was driving it and said he loves it because it doesn't drone in the cabin and it just sounds deep and exotic from the rear so theres no annoyance. this was the exact exhaust I was looking for. inbetween 3.5k rpms and 5k rpms it picked up 15 tq at the wheels u can definatley feel the difference.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 AM.