Anybody else downshift to reduce brake wear?
Anybody else downshift to reduce brake wear?
Does anybody else downshift using the manual shift mode or manual shifting to reduce brake wear? Is there a concern for transmissions? Would like to hear some of your thoughts......
Originally Posted by Canadian
Sounds like he is talking about AT.
I do it all the time, shouldn't be a problem.
I do it all the time, shouldn't be a problem.
Originally Posted by GRRRRR
Does anybody else downshift using the manual shift mode or manual shifting to reduce brake wear? Is there a concern for transmissions? Would like to hear some of your thoughts......
Trending Topics
Downshifting with the manual transmission in our cars isn't that effective of a braking mechanism because the drivetrain revs a little too freely to offer significant enough resistance to slow the vehicle down enough unless you really put it into a low gear so that your engine RPM's skyrocket up to like 5K(In my opinion). I have a 6MT and am very familiar with rev matching and down shifting to compression brake because I do it all the time in my truck and it works really well in that vehicle.... however, it is just flat-out not effective in the G as a means of braking.
I do keep the car in gear if I want to slow down so that the engine sorta offers a little resistance to help slow it down when I'm coasting towards a stop light from far away, and I do downshift(and rev match in the process) while approaching a corner so that I'm in the right gear for going into the corner, but that's about it on the G for messing with shifts on decelleration.
If you rev match and do it well, there isn't that much wear on your clutch. The part of the clutch that takes the most wear from rev-matched downshifts would be your throwout bearing since it's spinning at fairly high RPM's for a few tenths of a second per downshift. The plate itself should take very little wear though if you do it right, and the same can be said of the synchros in the transmission.
I do keep the car in gear if I want to slow down so that the engine sorta offers a little resistance to help slow it down when I'm coasting towards a stop light from far away, and I do downshift(and rev match in the process) while approaching a corner so that I'm in the right gear for going into the corner, but that's about it on the G for messing with shifts on decelleration.
If you rev match and do it well, there isn't that much wear on your clutch. The part of the clutch that takes the most wear from rev-matched downshifts would be your throwout bearing since it's spinning at fairly high RPM's for a few tenths of a second per downshift. The plate itself should take very little wear though if you do it right, and the same can be said of the synchros in the transmission.
Last edited by partyman66; Aug 31, 2007 at 08:10 PM.
Originally Posted by redlude97
I thought he was talking about either AT or MT? 

To answer the question: Rarely. I may downshift my MT on a long steep hill to avoid constantly tapping the brakes, otherwise no.
Originally Posted by RBull
You're right.
To answer the question: Rarely. I may downshift my MT on a long steep hill to avoid constantly tapping the brakes, otherwise no.
To answer the question: Rarely. I may downshift my MT on a long steep hill to avoid constantly tapping the brakes, otherwise no.
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
There are clutches in auto trannies too. Which are more expensive than manual clutches.
It's a bad idea
It's a bad idea




