new tail light overlays
cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea cup of tea
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
I haven't seen to many accords rolling around that look like my rear end. I do think that it looks a little ricey but I like the cleaner look of the rear end. I like the tail lights stock but it's just a little to much red. To be honest I was trying to get as close to the skylight line look as possible. Either way I understand that it may not be for everyone. I looked at Bats site and IMO the smoked tails only look good in black or maybe red. I was just trying to do a little different and that it is.
Here is a night pic for you guys. I think at night is where it really looks good.
Here is a night pic for you guys. I think at night is where it really looks good.
Last edited by jruss9819; Jan 5, 2005 at 04:32 AM.
Originally Posted by OldVFRGuy
Not to bust your bubble.....but,
Ok...so my brother in law is an attorney....and I was looking at some auto accident cases in one of his publications.....
A word of caution.....there was a case file about a pending lawsuit from a traffic accident.
The main point was US Goverment mandated, DOT required... orange turn signals & reflectors in front & red in rear.
The person at fault had a "Fast & Furious" type modded auto. The point of the lawsuit was that the insurance company denied paying the claim since the driver had modified his turn signals, headlights/taillights, and they did not meet legal DOT requirements! The plaintif says they were confused by the lights...as they know that all US cars must have.....
That would suck big ones!
Something to consider.....Insurance Companies look for any loopholes possible.
Ok...so my brother in law is an attorney....and I was looking at some auto accident cases in one of his publications.....
A word of caution.....there was a case file about a pending lawsuit from a traffic accident.
The main point was US Goverment mandated, DOT required... orange turn signals & reflectors in front & red in rear.
The person at fault had a "Fast & Furious" type modded auto. The point of the lawsuit was that the insurance company denied paying the claim since the driver had modified his turn signals, headlights/taillights, and they did not meet legal DOT requirements! The plaintif says they were confused by the lights...as they know that all US cars must have.....
That would suck big ones!
Something to consider.....Insurance Companies look for any loopholes possible.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Bergen County NJ
I think it just detracts from the coolest part of the car IMO... The taillights should be shown off as much as possible, not covered up with tinted film. In the night picture, the middle LEDs are begging to shed light but they are covered by the ugly silver tint. At least it matches the car perfectly tho. Just not my cup of ginseng infused green tea.
