Great numbers!

Please tell me you are having traction issues.

If not, what tires are you on and what kind of suspension setup do you have?

 

That makes a lot more sense. Unless he is running a very small pulley. With that HP to the wheels he would be running in the low 12's. Funny thing is most guys on here with SC/turbos barely run them at the tracks or at least they dont post their times. Lots of dyno racing going on. I don't believe those are rw numbers nor are they accurate based on a Dynojet standard let alone sae corrected.

Btw what type of dyno is that?

 

That was Dynapak that if I'm not mistaken bolts on to spindles.
Same car showed 240whp on Dynojet and 270whp on Dynapak.

 

LOLLLLLLLLLLL, i want to see it next time, words dont mean shi! IMO! Anyway nice dyno, things prob a beast, try and keep up witht hose M's

 

You guys are funny, Don't be mad at the HP that I'm getting. Yes it is on a dyno pack,
So you take about 10% off of the 391 = 352 at the rear wheels. That is about 415 at the flywheel. I mean come on I posted my dyno results for all you non believers.
And if you look at the dyno results im getting 9PSI at redline. And my car is getting these numbers with no tuning yet. If you still don't believe me call churches auto
ask for Shawn.
David G

 

Listen man, are you really just after the bragging rights? I doubt it, so let all of these people think what they want and dont let it get to you lol, i understand tho, i would be mad also TUNE THAT BEAST

 

Not 10%. About 20 hp off is reasonable. But no way you're gonna tell me 39 ponies dif.

 

the flywheel verbiage is not correct on the charts...that would only be accuarte if they had an engine dyno. I asked Shawn at churches about that and he said he'd asked DyaPack to remove that from their sheets and they won't...don't ask me why. Research it yourself.

 

I sure am going to tell you it's off 39 ponies, probably more! Check the CFL dyno day (dynojet) and the SoCal dyno day (dynapack). The NA cars varied by 20% +++.

Also, there is close to a 20% drivetrain loss on the NA G35's. Assuming only a 10% loss is simply incorrect. I'd say the numbers are in all actuality lower. A good tune should do wonders to the high numbers you're already seeing. Either way, as long as you're happy with the gains, I'm happy for you.

My suggestion... Only post SAE corrected rwhp numbers and make sure to state whether you had your tire on the drum or your axel on a machine. Makes for a BIG difference.

 

eh, doesnt say much...you really should have done a baseline! that dyno is reading high.