G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Attempting rb25 swap, suggestions? help?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 07-06-2013, 01:58 PM
itgogitrev's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincy
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
It's hard to say if the rod knocking engine can be rebuilt. At best, it will need new rod bearings and a check on the cylinder bores/head surface/pistons and skirts to make sure the block/head is good. At the worst, you'll need to have the crank machined with thicker bearings installed and a block refresh if the head/block mating surfaces are good.

The rev-up engine is a decent base for sub 500 hp goals. A balance of the crank with new rods and possibly pistons will allow you to hit 500hp with FI easily and reliably while maintaining a useable power band; however, supporting engine parts will need to be replaced and tuned (fuel pump, injectors, ecu, etc). I would even consider a supercharger over ST/TT for simplicity and easier diagnostics for possible future issues, but if high numbers is your goal (600+hp), then turbo would be the better choice.

I've only built 5 engines and done 12 swaps (mostly VWs), so I'm hardly an expert on this subject... but simplicity is key to staying within a modest budget. Keeping the same engine that the car was designed with will exponentially make things easier and will nearly eliminate all of the complexity of having to mess with suspension tuning to compensate for the difference in engine weight. Just an example, a VQ (alum block) is around 330lbs dry weight while an RB25 (iron block) is over 600lbs.
 
  #17  
Old 07-06-2013, 02:30 PM
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Received 24 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by itgogitrev
It's hard to say if the rod knocking engine can be rebuilt. At best, it will need new rod bearings and a check on the cylinder bores/head surface/pistons and skirts to make sure the block/head is good. At the worst, you'll need to have the crank machined with thicker bearings installed and a block refresh if the head/block mating surfaces are good.

The rev-up engine is a decent base for sub 500 hp goals. A balance of the crank with new rods and possibly pistons will allow you to hit 500hp with FI easily and reliably while maintaining a useable power band; however, supporting engine parts will need to be replaced and tuned (fuel pump, injectors, ecu, etc). I would even consider a supercharger over ST/TT for simplicity and easier diagnostics for possible future issues, but if high numbers is your goal (600+hp), then turbo would be the better choice.

I've only built 5 engines and done 12 swaps (mostly VWs), so I'm hardly an expert on this subject... but simplicity is key to staying within a modest budget. Keeping the same engine that the car was designed with will exponentially make things easier and will nearly eliminate all of the complexity of having to mess with suspension tuning to compensate for the difference in engine weight. Just an example, a VQ (alum block) is around 330lbs dry weight while an RB25 (iron block) is over 600lbs.
Holy crap that's ridiculous. I suppose years of technology and different materials lowered that weight along with a new design but still.

As I mentioned to the OP in the beginning the G is easier to swap an LS into, but easiest would be to do a built block, and go from there.
 
  #18  
Old 07-06-2013, 02:49 PM
itgogitrev's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincy
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
The layout of the engine and the materials is a BIG factor in the weight. That's one of the reasons BMW went to an aluminum V8 on the M3 instead of continuing with the I6. Lighter and shorter, the new V8 helped out with packaging in the engine bay. More room for plastic engine covers I guess.
 
  #19  
Old 07-06-2013, 03:42 PM
Billy Meade's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by itgogitrev
It's hard to say if the rod knocking engine can be rebuilt. At best, it will need new rod bearings and a check on the cylinder bores/head surface/pistons and skirts to make sure the block/head is good. At the worst, you'll need to have the crank machined with thicker bearings installed and a block refresh if the head/block mating surfaces are good.

The rev-up engine is a decent base for sub 500 hp goals. A balance of the crank with new rods and possibly pistons will allow you to hit 500hp with FI easily and reliably while maintaining a useable power band; however, supporting engine parts will need to be replaced and tuned (fuel pump, injectors, ecu, etc). I would even consider a supercharger over ST/TT for simplicity and easier diagnostics for possible future issues, but if high numbers is your goal (600+hp), then turbo would be the better choice.

I've only built 5 engines and done 12 swaps (mostly VWs), so I'm hardly an expert on this subject... but simplicity is key to staying within a modest budget. Keeping the same engine that the car was designed with will exponentially make things easier and will nearly eliminate all of the complexity of having to mess with suspension tuning to compensate for the difference in engine weight. Just an example, a VQ (alum block) is around 330lbs dry weight while an RB25 (iron block) is over 600lbs.
Thanks for all that! I'm now on the fence between an LS swap, or build a vq. In terms of money, is there a better option or will both be about the same in the end?

I feel like the custom work on the LS swap will be similar in price as the modified VQ parts
 
  #20  
Old 07-06-2013, 04:29 PM
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Received 24 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Billy Meade
Thanks for all that! I'm now on the fence between an LS swap, or build a vq. In terms of money, is there a better option or will both be about the same in the end?

I feel like the custom work on the LS swap will be similar in price as the modified VQ parts
http://www.importpartspro.com/st1vqloblni3.html

Obviously getting a built VQ is cheaper than going ***** out on an LS swap as the built VQ is gonna be for the lack of a better word, a direct bolt on, yank old drop new process. Whereas the LS engine will require buying/fabbing more parts/kits to make the engine work with the rest of the g35 platform.

The end results would be nicer with an LS swap, and of course GM parts are somewhat cheap but the initial upfront cost and downtime for you to do an LS swap will be much more than it would be to get a built block from IPP and call it a good day.
 
  #21  
Old 07-06-2013, 05:24 PM
Billy Meade's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by hologram
http://www.importpartspro.com/st1vqloblni3.html

Obviously getting a built VQ is cheaper than going ***** out on an LS swap as the built VQ is gonna be for the lack of a better word, a direct bolt on, yank old drop new process. Whereas the LS engine will require buying/fabbing more parts/kits to make the engine work with the rest of the g35 platform.

The end results would be nicer with an LS swap, and of course GM parts are somewhat cheap but the initial upfront cost and downtime for you to do an LS swap will be much more than it would be to get a built block from IPP and call it a good day.
Ugh I'm so torn! The built block direct bolt sounds nice. Ima look into this, thanks so much
 

Last edited by Billy Meade; 07-06-2013 at 05:28 PM.
  #22  
Old 07-06-2013, 06:52 PM
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Received 24 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Billy Meade
Ugh I'm so torn! The built block direct bolt sounds nice. Ima look into this, thanks so much
Based on your reactions sounds like you didn't really think this through before posting and didn't do any homework as to what any of this will entail. Go back to the drawing board man. Stick a stock block in there pulled out of a wrecked G for like 1k and call it a day. Look on craigslist if need be.
 
  #23  
Old 07-06-2013, 07:44 PM
itgogitrev's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincy
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Hologram said it best. A built VQ drops in with no further mods, making it more of an all inclusive solution.
 
  #24  
Old 07-06-2013, 07:48 PM
Xet's Avatar
Xet
Xet is offline
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sj
Posts: 4,197
Received 171 Likes on 143 Posts
It seems like you really don't have a good idea about the entire process of a swap and what it encompasses, nor even that much about the motors you are considering swapping in. It also seems like you are on a tighter budget. Considering this, I really suggest that you just go with a replacement stock block or if you are building an FI setup, a built block. This will keep it more plug and play and seeing as you have little to no experience doing a swap, keep it as simple and cheap as possible for you.
 
The following users liked this post:
hologram (07-06-2013)
  #25  
Old 07-07-2013, 01:03 AM
Billy Meade's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah i think ima go with a built vq, about how much power will the non-revup make in this version? http://www.importpartspro.com/st1vqloblni3.html
 
  #26  
Old 07-07-2013, 01:39 AM
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Received 24 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Billy Meade
Yeah i think ima go with a built vq, about how much power will the non-revup make in this version? http://www.importpartspro.com/st1vqloblni3.html
You clearly have very little knowledge of this subject.

Depending om compression ratio the block may even make less power than a stock revup motor as these motors are mostly bought by people going FI. The DE engine comes with very high compression in the G, 11:1 if I'm correct, which is not desirable for FI. So most folks go lower in compression to have a block that'll do better with boost. This means it'll make less power than a stock block before you add FI.

Now if you go for more aggressive cams, you'll just be shifting more power from the midrage to the top of the rev range and make more power there. Your other option is to get a higher compression block then stock, but then you run into many other issues down the road like good luck finding gas to run that high compression....

Seriously, do you know what you're even talking about when you type half the **** you type?
 
  #27  
Old 07-07-2013, 02:42 AM
Billy Meade's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by hologram
Seriously, do you know what you're even talking about when you type half the **** you type?
?
i didnt know it was frowned upon to attempt to learn, sorry.

Originally Posted by hologram
The DE engine comes with very high compression in the G, 11:1 if I'm correct
ok say im not turboing it, (not sure yet), you're saying stock the vq35s are at an 11:1? i thought it was 9:1? So since that one in the link is advertised "its good to turbo" i assume the comp ratio is about 8:1?
 

Last edited by Billy Meade; 07-07-2013 at 02:50 AM.
  #28  
Old 07-07-2013, 02:49 AM
hologram's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 332
Received 24 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Billy Meade
i didnt know it was frowned upon to attempt to learn, sorry.

Thanks i guess.
Most people that want to swap out an engine+tranny for a completely new drivetrain have some idea of what it will entail. I figure you'd at least done some research before posting. It seems it also surprised you a built block was a direct replacement for your shot block.

Furthermore, I am willing to guess, that you weren't expecting a total cost of over 15k to do an engine/tranny swap for an LS/RB build.
 
  #29  
Old 07-07-2013, 04:01 AM
Billy Meade's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by hologram
Most people that want to swap out an engine+tranny for a completely new drivetrain have some idea of what it will entail. I figure you'd at least done some research before posting. It seems it also surprised you a built block was a direct replacement for your shot block.

Furthermore, I am willing to guess, that you weren't expecting a total cost of over 15k to do an engine/tranny swap for an LS/RB build.
Those are the exact reasons i posted, whats better research than being able to hear it from a primary source? i thought the rb would be around 10 grand, LS about 15. and i obviously knew a build longblock is a direct boltup.
 

Last edited by Billy Meade; 07-07-2013 at 04:46 AM.
  #30  
Old 07-07-2013, 05:43 AM
ReStylin's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 435
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
The RB wont be 10k... Plus the extra 300lbs in the front.... in an entirly different configuration is going to **** up your handling.... I wouldnt drive your car over 100kmph.

The reason why LS swaps work... it because it is basically the same weight.... +/- 40lbs. But more importantly it maintains its center(and centerline) of gravity because it keeps its V configuration, vs a straight 6 witha bias of weight on its passenger side...

But Hey, you know what your talking about by the sounds like.

and you COULD do the LS build for less then 4k if you had a few connections, a pound of luck, and a metric **** tonne of skill with a welder...

Which you might have the most expensive part solved, since you DO weld...

FABRICATION of mounts lol and labor.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Attempting rb25 swap, suggestions? help?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM.