G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

e36 m3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-17-2005, 05:54 PM
JoeyG35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ran against a '98 E36 M3. He got a better launch than me and was ahead in 1st. By 3rd gear I had caught up and we were about even. Shift into 4th and I just take off on him and pull about 1 car length to the end of the 1/4mile. If we kept going, I don't think he would have caught up. I pretty much just kept the lead.
 
  #17  
Old 05-18-2005, 06:35 AM
neffster's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fast95m3
curb weight on a 95 m3 is 3180, so 332 pounds less. i'd take 300 pound difference vs 20-30 hp difference any day. i own both, and the m3 feels faster and i've tracked mine under 14 secs a few times in the past.

Car and driver 1995 clocked the 95 M3 as follows:

0-60 5.3 sec (BMW claims 6.1)
1/4 14.3 sec (BMW claims 14.8)
Top speed limited 137 MPH - it'll top out around 150 if you remove the top speed limiter.

That's all subjective, but it'll give you an idea where you fare.
The 1995 M3's have a lower displacement engine than the 1996's. This would account for a lower weight in your comparison... As far as 1/4 mile times (see my sig)
 
  #18  
Old 05-18-2005, 09:25 AM
//m-zilla's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also have owned both and yes the //M3 would win all day with equal drivers. I had a 96 cosmos with Dinan stg 5 upgrades and the list goes on. I love my G though it gets just as many looks.
 
Attached Thumbnails e36 m3-web2.jpg   e36 m3-fronttop.jpg  

Last edited by //m-zilla; 05-18-2005 at 09:27 AM.
  #19  
Old 05-18-2005, 09:30 AM
aerisolphaln's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^ I think it's silly to compare a modded M3 to a stock G, or a modded G to a stock M3, or for that matter, a G to an M3.

And, who really cares if our cars could beat something BMW put out almost TEN years ago. That's kind of pathetic that we are relegated to comparing the G to something that's almost a decade old. For shame, gentlemen, for shame.
 
  #20  
Old 05-18-2005, 10:17 AM
dentalstud's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aerisolphaln
^^^ I think it's silly to compare a modded M3 to a stock G, or a modded G to a stock M3, or for that matter, a G to an M3.

And, who really cares if our cars could beat something BMW put out almost TEN years ago. That's kind of pathetic that we are relegated to comparing the G to something that's almost a decade old. For shame, gentlemen, for shame.

Actually, it's "kind of pathetic" that our cars are merely comparable to something BMW put out TEN years ago, at least performance-wise. For shame, Infiniti, for shame. And Neff, do you really think 0.2 liters of displacement weighs close to 332 pounds? Maybe 50 tops. The weight advantage holds. Good point, I know. Thanks.
 
  #21  
Old 05-18-2005, 10:28 AM
Rookie84's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NoVA/Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dentalstud
Actually, it's "kind of pathetic" that our cars are merely comparable to something BMW put out TEN years ago, at least performance-wise. For shame, Infiniti, for shame. And Neff, do you really think 0.2 liters of displacement weighs close to 332 pounds? Maybe 50 tops. The weight advantage holds. Good point, I know. Thanks.
Not really... just look at current M3. Maybe next gen G will be comparable to its performance. Maybe not. M3 is no joke and BMW do their homework with each M cars they produce.
 
  #22  
Old 05-18-2005, 10:41 AM
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, I think it's pathetic that you're looking at it that way. The M series has always been on the cutting edge of performance and it's still one of the quickest cars ont the road (E36). The G35 was never meant to compete with anything "M" in price or performance...it's competition is BMW's entry-level luxury car, the 3-Series. Now if you're just comparing a regular E36 (328) or even a E46 (330i), then it would be pathetic if the G35 couldn't match it. Even the 2005 330i ZHP at around $45k still can't match the E36 M3, so the G35 running with it or even beating it is actually a compliment. A better comparision would be the E36 M3 with the R34 GT-R and the upcoming GT-R (R35) with the E46 M3, The R34 specimen being a souped-up version of a lesser car...just like the M.
 
  #23  
Old 05-18-2005, 10:50 AM
Rookie84's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NoVA/Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E36 M3 and R34 GT-R? Hell, even E46 M3 doens't have a chance against R34 GT-R.
 
  #24  
Old 05-18-2005, 11:04 AM
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, that's a fair comparision. The M's are tweaked versions of regular BMW cars and the Skyline GT-R (R34) is a tweaked version of a regular Skyline (V34?). The R35 will actually separate the bloodline between the Skyline and the GT-R. The R35 will be a direct competitior to the M3 ( a high performance GT) and if Infiniti uses the same price stategy as when they introduced the G35 and M45, then the GT-R should cost between $50-$55.
 
  #25  
Old 05-18-2005, 01:56 PM
fast95m3's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I own both and love both. They are both great cars. This discussion really means nothing because you might beat an M3 one day and lose to another one on another day. Who really cares? If you're buying a G to race people and beat them, you've bought the wrong car. That's not its purpose. The M3 is built to race, otherwise its a 325 or 328 or 330, right? There's no race version of the G from the factory.

Neff, your times are great, I hope i can achieve those when i'm done with the break-in period.

The numbers i put up are subjective from a magazine. But, of course, that all depends on how good the driver is . Its just for a rough comparison.

And btw, i still have my M3 and it still runs great. Never had problems with it, i guess i'm just lucky in that regard.
 
  #26  
Old 05-18-2005, 08:02 PM
manh3's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 202
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
the thing is that the U.S. version of the e36 M3 is really a 328i with a bored out motor and with the european suspension. The euro version has 321hp and 260lb tq with individual throttlebodies, glass headlights with projectors. The U.S. version is sadly not a true M3, I use to have a 97 so i know this car. The 95 are the easy to mod and a fully modded one will indeed be able to beat a fully modded G. If the U.S. and and euro were the same i wouldn't be in a G right now. For those who know, vanos sounds sick as hell.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avalino
New Members Check In
0
08-06-2015 01:42 PM
Autobahn1
The G-Spot
17
05-04-2012 11:21 AM
infinitialex
Not G35 Related
1
01-30-2007 03:43 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: e36 m3



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.