G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Coupe

Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #2  
Old 11-27-2002, 11:34 AM
stewa101's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

The handling is definitely better than the z's. I would assume the straight line acceleration to be about the same, giving the Z a slight edge because of weight.

Andrew

2003 6MT blue premium aero (on order)
 
  #3  
Old 11-27-2002, 01:56 PM
zp2063's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

How do you figure that the g35 coupe has better handling than the Z? Did you see something published, or have other data to back that claim up?

I have not yet had a chance to drive both, so I can't say for sure, but I have wondered which would handle better (although I think the difference would be slight either way).

My first guess would be that the Z handles better. The Z has a front sway bar, the g35c does not. The Z is also a bit lower than the g35c. Are there any other differences betweene the two with regards to handling? Are the suspension setups identical?

 
  #4  
Old 11-27-2002, 02:15 PM
stewa101's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

The main reason the G35 handles better is that it is longer, and has better stock tires than the Z. The G35c recorded a .92G skidpag mark during Road and Track Testing.
This is taken from that article.

"And how does the car tackle corners? In fine sports-car fashion, thank you very much. With the same basic suspension setup as the Z — multilink at both front and rear — the G35 Sport Coupe exhibits crisp turn-in response and minimal body roll. The power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering system is precise and quick, while the Brembo brakes do an exceptional job of bringing the car to a halt. And thanks to its slightly longer wheelbase (112.2 in. to the Z's 104.3), the car feels more balanced and stable through corners than the Z, especially noticeable through quick left/right transitions where the Z's rear end can become a touch twitchy. In fact, the G35 recorded better handling numbers at the test track. It achieved 0.92g around the skidpad and danced through the slalom at 67.7 mph, besting the 350Z's 0.89g and 65.6 mph."

Also, at a recent autocrossing meet that my roomate was at, the times for the coupes were on average faster than those for the z's. The best time for the z was a full 3 seconds slower (72.6 to 75.3 seconds) than the g35c. Of course, a lot of this depends on the driver.

Andrew

2003 6MT blue premium aero (on order)
 
  #5  
Old 11-28-2002, 12:06 AM
zp2063's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

Interesting. Thanks for your perspective.

One question though - what does Road and Track mean when they say that the Z "rear end can become a touch twitchy"? And why is it that it behaves this way (length, weight, tires, etc.)

 
  #6  
Old 11-28-2002, 11:19 AM
stewa101's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

They mean that because of the Z's shorter wheelbase, when accelrating out of a turn, the back tires can cause the end to move in an unexpected fashion. It is probably the reason the z's times were slower in the slalom. Or it ould have just been the conditions for that day.

Andrew

2003 6MT blue premium aero (on order)
 
  #8  
Old 11-29-2002, 06:07 PM
zp2063's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!

Excellent! Thanks for the input.

 
  #9  
Old 07-08-2005, 11:29 PM
Jtrain's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Florida!
Posts: 3,705
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Bump
 
  #10  
Old 07-08-2005, 11:38 PM
heeb's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jtrain
Bump
wtf?
 
  #11  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:06 AM
TheGest's Avatar
Gangster Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
could it be that the .92 skidpad G was on 18s and the 87. skidpad was on 19s?
 
  #12  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:07 AM
TheGest's Avatar
Gangster Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ohhh damn i just noticed this is from 3 years ago, jtrain whats a matter with you
 
  #13  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:18 AM
Deang35c6's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I knew something was wrong when I saw a Copperhead post. He just disappeared off the face of the earth about 1.5 years ago
 
  #14  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:49 AM
sillyhenry's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well if you're comparing the base Z against the 6mt the Z is faster due to the weight, longer wheelbases do not imply better handling actually smaller wheel bases are better, the higher wheelbase contributes to better high-speed stability
 
  #15  
Old 07-09-2005, 12:55 AM
gp35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lol
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Offical Motor Trend G35C: 0 to 60 5.83 secs!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 AM.