G35 Sedan V35 2003-06 Discussion about the 1st Generation V35 G35 Sedan

Why are coupes faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 04:02 AM
  #1  
Vince5d's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Why are coupes faster?

The G35 2wd sedan is a bit lighter (~50lbs) than the coupe. The coupe posts up 1/4 mile and 0-60mph times that are nearly 0.5 seconds quicker in most road tests with the same transmission. Any ideas as of why? Do the coupes really put down more actual power to the wheels?

I'm not concerned with a few tenths for a daily car, but I was curious.
 

Last edited by Vince5d; Feb 18, 2007 at 04:05 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 06:03 AM
  #2  
digital1986's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 1
From: BORING Utah
Great info here
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 07:16 AM
  #3  
jimmyc13's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 3
From: Boston, MA
Good queston Vince. Glad you added that last line in your thread .
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #4  
godmans's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 4
let me try to give my 2cents:

Tires play a major factor in 0-60 and quarter mile, where if you get a good launch, you might be able to shave up to .5 off your quarter mile time when compared to a bad launch... In this aspect, I don't think the crappy turzana on our sedan can give you a good lauch when compared to the high end Michelin Pilot Sport (I wish PS2 comes stock tho!!) that comes stock on the coupes
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #5  
TheTrance's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
Originally Posted by digital1986

If you took the time to post, why didn't you put the keywords?
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by Vince5d
The G35 2wd sedan is a bit lighter (~50lbs) than the coupe. The coupe posts up 1/4 mile and 0-60mph times that are nearly 0.5 seconds quicker in most road tests with the same transmission. Any ideas as of why? Do the coupes really put down more actual power to the wheels?

I'm not concerned with a few tenths for a daily car, but I was curious.
Look at the true 1/4 mile times from this site and you'll see that the coupes are not faster.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #7  
TheTrance's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, AB
http://www.automobilemag.com/test_data//index1.html

2004 sedan 5AT 5.6 14.3
2003 coupe 6MT 6.0 14.6

hmmm....
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 01:06 PM
  #8  
Jdm_fool's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: West palm beach, FL
Originally Posted by TheTrance
http://www.automobilemag.com/test_data//index1.html

2004 sedan 5AT 5.6 14.3
2003 coupe 6MT 6.0 14.6

hmmm....
i was about to say. i thought the sedans were bit faster now i know for sure thanks
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #9  
godmans's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 4
Major auto magazines actually post the 03-06 sedans as ~ 6 second for 0-60 and 14.5, 97 for quarter mile

Yet, I do agree that members on this board post better numbers or at least similar numbers to coupes
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #10  
DieselX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by TheTrance
http://www.automobilemag.com/test_data//index1.html

2004 sedan 5AT 5.6 14.3
2003 coupe 6MT 6.0 14.6

hmmm....
Looks like a ****ty driver in the coupe lol.

They need to compare 04 auto sedan VS 04 auto coupe... and 06 auto sedan vs 06 auto coupe.. same goes for manual. In the end, I think they're almost the same speed, maybe .1 second difference.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #11  
G35x-06's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
looks like the X times are way off
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 03:54 PM
  #12  
DieselX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 4
From: Brooklyn, NY
Looking at that diagram, I think they messed up the coupe and sedan sections. Besides the speed traps and tranny's, look at the braking distance. 171 for coupe and 151 for sedan. That year coupe on stick came with Brembos, so no way the sedan stopped faster. Anyone disagree?

And the X times look off aswell. Maybe it was with the snow button on. I dunno...
 

Last edited by DieselX; Feb 18, 2007 at 03:56 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 04:21 PM
  #13  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by DieselX
Looking at that diagram, I think they messed up the coupe and sedan sections. Besides the speed traps and tranny's, look at the braking distance. 171 for coupe and 151 for sedan. That year coupe on stick came with Brembos, so no way the sedan stopped faster. Anyone disagree?

And the X times look off aswell. Maybe it was with the snow button on. I dunno...
The Brembos never offered better stopping distance, often times it was a feet longer. Bigger brakes don't necessarily mean better stopping. Now if you're road racing with lots of 120 to 70mph braking, then yes, the Brembos would be better.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #14  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by G35x-06
looks like the X times are way off
Yeah, I've seen 14.4s@96mph posted for the G35X by Car & Driver.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 05:45 PM
  #15  
bugsdad's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Wink Thats just COLD!

Originally Posted by digital1986

BRRRRR!
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 PM.