Calling all sedans-What's your fender height?

Subscribe
Mar 10, 2011 | 01:13 AM
  #31  
Quote: 2006 Non-Sport Sedan
F: 27.5
R: 28

^ Is that on 17"s? Tire size?
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 01:27 AM
  #32  
Quote: ^ Is that on 17"s? Tire size?
Yes, stock 17's (7 Spoke)
Tire: 215/55/17 Firestone Firehawk GT (OEM I think)
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 01:35 AM
  #33  
F: 24"
r: 24.5"
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 05:32 AM
  #34  
No I'm 8.5 +23. Natural +38 with a 15mm spacer. Are you sure you aren't +20?



Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 10:30 AM
  #35  
apparantly I cannot add. I am sure I am +10. Started at +20 and added a 10mm spacer. I will be going down .25" up front and the rear will stay put.

Here is a pic of front fitment w/ my phone sitting against my fender


Rear fitment as well:
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 11:20 AM
  #36  
Here is SNOOPs. He is at +10 as well. You sure you are not +13, BD?




he is on a 225/35/19.
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 11:34 AM
  #37  
That's a better picture of your front. My wheel sits perfectly flush with the fender and you have some poke. Makes sense now.
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 12:15 PM
  #38  
Quote: am i the only one who doesnt like low? haha
Yes, leave
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 12:18 PM
  #39  
Quote: Interesting that everything on these cars is metric, yet it's shod with 17/18/19" wheels. I guess that's a world standard.
You think that's weird?

Looks at tire sizes.

225/35/18

225 is MM
35 is a %
18 is inches lol

No wonder people are so confused with tires all the time, it's like learning a new form of measurement.

Also, why do the states refer to their cars as 3.5L, why not 213s or a .92 Gal

United states are the only people still using the imperial system, why haven't you guys figured out how much it sucks? lol
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 02:36 PM
  #40  
you guys think with 19's you can go lower then compared to 18's ?
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 02:41 PM
  #41  
18s are smaller and thus will get the car lower.

If you are asking what will "look" lower based on the fender compared to the tire/wheel then 19s (or 20s) for sure. In order to tuck a significant amount of tire on 18s you'd practically have to put your car on the ground. 19s are the perfect balance because you can slam it, tuck tire, and bumper will be closer to the ground (compared to 20s).
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 03:16 PM
  #42  
^ yep thats something i've been noticing.

i might have to go up to 19's now for a better look.
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 04:03 PM
  #43  
Quote: That's a better picture of your front. My wheel sits perfectly flush with the fender and you have some poke. Makes sense now.
side shots are hard to judge. Glad I could help. Gravis are looking good.
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 04:49 PM
  #44  
I'm tempted to change out to a bigger spacer in the front but then I'd need to do the same in the rear which would necessitate a smaller tire in the rear which I don't want to do.

After being initially skeptical of the chrome I fall in love with my rims more and more each day.
Reply 0
Mar 10, 2011 | 07:44 PM
  #45  
^NICE pics everyone

25 front and 25 1/4 rear
Tein Flex. Not maxed out =(
18x9 F 18x10 R 245/40all +24all

http://www.flickr.com/photos/aaron_boost/5103547339/sizes/l/in/set-72157623992326163/http://www.flickr.com/photos/aaron_boost/4532952397/sizes/l/in/set-72157623992326163/
Reply 0