0:60 times for the 6mt
0:60 times for the 6mt
I just read in C&D the 350Z 30th anniversary with 300 horses and 260 lbxft torque did 0:60 5.6 sec and 1/4 mile: 14.1 sec. I guess since the 6mt G35 has the same powertrain but 150 lbs extra, it must be able to do: 0:60 5.8 and 1/4 mile in 14.4.
What do you guys think?
What do you guys think?
Anyone find it interesting that the 300hp Z is actually a tick slower than the 287hp Z? That's what happens when you trade midrange power for topend power (287hp/270ft/lbs vs 300hp/260ft/lbs).
As for the G35 sedan MT, yes, I think 5.8 0-60 would be correct regardless if it's an 03.5/04 or the "more powerful" 05. The 5.8 0-60 also assumes you hook up offf the line which is a rarity with the on/off nature of Nissan clutches. In most drivers hands, the 6MT will do 0-60 in the lower 6s.....or worse. Most people aren't good drivers. It's hilarous to watch or read about people that think they're great drivers and then they go to the track and realize that they're not so great and that what they thought was good traction is pure crap.
As for the G35 sedan MT, yes, I think 5.8 0-60 would be correct regardless if it's an 03.5/04 or the "more powerful" 05. The 5.8 0-60 also assumes you hook up offf the line which is a rarity with the on/off nature of Nissan clutches. In most drivers hands, the 6MT will do 0-60 in the lower 6s.....or worse. Most people aren't good drivers. It's hilarous to watch or read about people that think they're great drivers and then they go to the track and realize that they're not so great and that what they thought was good traction is pure crap.
Originally Posted by DaveB
Anyone find it interesting that the 300hp Z is actually a tick slower than the 287hp Z? That's what happens when you trade midrange power for topend power (287hp/270ft/lbs vs 300hp/260ft/lbs).
As for the G35 sedan MT, yes, I think 5.8 0-60 would be correct regardless if it's an 03.5/04 or the "more powerful" 05. The 5.8 0-60 also assumes you hook up offf the line which is a rarity with the on/off nature of Nissan clutches. In most drivers hands, the 6MT will do 0-60 in the lower 6s.....or worse. Most people aren't good drivers. It's hilarous to watch or read about people that think they're great drivers and then they go to the track and realize that they're not so great and that what they thought was good traction is pure crap.
As for the G35 sedan MT, yes, I think 5.8 0-60 would be correct regardless if it's an 03.5/04 or the "more powerful" 05. The 5.8 0-60 also assumes you hook up offf the line which is a rarity with the on/off nature of Nissan clutches. In most drivers hands, the 6MT will do 0-60 in the lower 6s.....or worse. Most people aren't good drivers. It's hilarous to watch or read about people that think they're great drivers and then they go to the track and realize that they're not so great and that what they thought was good traction is pure crap.
Not that I am in favor of A/T, not even for a sec, I wish my Gx comes with MT. I will be the first on line to trade it in if they are coming with Gx MT. Till this day, I still can't get used to A/T.
For 0-60 cases only, I'd be willing to be most auto's would beat most 6mt drivers on this board. The 6mt on the G35 isn't the EASIEST to drive and finding the right launch RPM can be tricky. Light to light or 0-60 I'd probably say an auto would beat a 6mt 7/10 times. 1/4 mile is a different story and so is top-speed run.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
I don't know if I would agree on that assumption Brian V. Your right the 6mt is tricky to launch. I have driven quite a few AT loaners. the thing that bugs me about them is that lag right on launch. It keeps the wheels from spining too much but you also lose out on precious time.
In mine I have found a good slip of the clutch and a wee bit of wheelspin gives me the fastest launch.
In mine I have found a good slip of the clutch and a wee bit of wheelspin gives me the fastest launch.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by BrianV
For 0-60 cases only, I'd be willing to be most auto's would beat most 6mt drivers on this board. The 6mt on the G35 isn't the EASIEST to drive and finding the right launch RPM can be tricky. Light to light or 0-60 I'd probably say an auto would beat a 6mt 7/10 times. 1/4 mile is a different story and so is top-speed run.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
Originally Posted by BrianV
For 0-60 cases only, I'd be willing to be most auto's would beat most 6mt drivers on this board. The 6mt on the G35 isn't the EASIEST to drive and finding the right launch RPM can be tricky. Light to light or 0-60 I'd probably say an auto would beat a 6mt 7/10 times. 1/4 mile is a different story and so is top-speed run.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
Originally Posted by gq916
A 2005 G35 coupe 6 speed can definetly hit 14.0...probably 13.9 with a good driver
Your right the 6mt is tricky to launch. I have driven quite a few AT loaners. the thing that bugs me about them is that lag right on launch. It keeps the wheels from spining too much but you also lose out on precious time.
When cars start getting in the sub-6 second category, it's hard for manuals to outpace autos in 0-60. Take a look at the Pontiac GTO, it's faster in 4 spd auto form then it is in 6spd (both 0-60 and 1/4 mile), same goes for the Benz SLK350.
1) More consistent
2) Harder launch
3) Less broken parts
Last edited by DaveB; Feb 4, 2005 at 11:51 PM.
Arent most of the fastest LS1 auto on a so called custom tranny that has a high stall? If us owners also do this so called high stall mod I bet many of them could see anywhere from .1-.3 improvement in their times I assume..
Originally Posted by deadmanincbh
Arent most of the fastest LS1 auto on a so called custom tranny that has a high stall? If us owners also do this so called high stall mod I bet many of them could see anywhere from .1-.3 improvement in their times I assume..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




