G35 Sedan V36 2007- 08 Discussion about the 2nd Generation G35 Sedan 2007 - 08

"Sample" 2007 G35 Sedan at SW Infiniti - Houston

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #16  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Traveling Administrator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 30,233
Likes: 175
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
I am enjoying these first hand comments from you members that have seen the new G in person. Keep em coming!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #17  
John105's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bzabodyn
Oops, forgot to mention - salesperson said that the fully loaded model will MSRP between $38-40k - that's all he's been told thus far... take it for what it's worth...
That's pretty nice, say you want a manual, don't want active steer, maybe get a 2500 discount, fully-loaded you could be looking at 35'ish 36'ish at most. Great value!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #18  
John105's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by trebien
The M5 is a great car... but I sure don't envy the 13 MPG rating for a daily driver. Those high revving/compression engines suck some gas, just like the M3 did. Ouch.

At 15K miles per year, one would pay almost $100 per month more in gas compared to the new G35 sedan.
Let's not kid ourselves, you have to be rich to have an M5. There isn't any should I get the Accord, the G35, or the M5. I really can't decide!

Who in their right mind is gonna pay a gas guzzler tax? Someone who isn't phased by paying a grand or more for nothing at all.

Again, to even imply that the G35 is comparable to an M5, I just don't get it. Can't G35 owners get over this keeping up with the Jones? Evaluate the G35 on its own merits, stop thinking it outperforms a German car. Well, it does, what it lacks in resale it makes up for in reliability!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 07:44 PM
  #19  
trebien's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: ATX
John105 - not necessarily. That 2001 M5 is valued around $35K or less... about the same or less than a G35. And it will probably depreciate much slower as well, even though maintenance (and possible repairs) would be higher. I would cross-shop those attributes... and am.

My point was more this... that M5 (stock) tends to get to 60 in about 4.8 seconds, and the 1/4 mile in about 13.3. That's faster than the G35, no doubt... but not that much faster than the 5.2 and 13.9 ON A BRAND NEW ENGINE that C&D just posted. Of course the M5 is faster, but my point is that basically it's a great time to be alive and love sports cars when entry level sedans are posting numbers like this. With the old G35, getting under 14 seconds in the 1/4 mile was very rare... with this new model, I think 13.8 or so will be the new lower limit in stock config. That's impressive, while having as much space as a 5 series and getting 19/27 mpg. It also weighs about 400 pounds less than the M5, so with suspension tweaks, should do quite well. I can't wait to really flog a G35 and see what the handling is like compared to the older model - if you read between the lines of many of the reviews, what they are saying (without saying) is that the new G35 has some impressive handling and roadfeel.

The new M5 is even more of a monster, no doubt. But we should be really impressed with what Infiniti is bringing to the table, as far as tech gadgets, performance and handling for well under $40K... on par with highly praised cars of just a few years ago. That's all...
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 08:14 PM
  #20  
GarciaCars's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: NM
We got our '07 at my dealership in Albuquerque yesterday (10/9). It is liquid platinum loaded up. There were five others on the truck, one going to El Paso and the rest to Florida. The Blue Slate is really cool. I wish I had ordered some of that color, I was afraid it was going to look like the Twilight, which is saleproof. The trunk opening is pretty small with the CD changer in the trunk.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 08:24 PM
  #21  
GoofyG28's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco/San Mateo
Originally Posted by GarciaCars
We got our '07 at my dealership in Albuquerque yesterday (10/9). It is liquid platinum loaded up. There were five others on the truck, one going to El Paso and the rest to Florida. The Blue Slate is really cool. I wish I had ordered some of that color, I was afraid it was going to look like the Twilight, which is saleproof. The trunk opening is pretty small with the CD changer in the trunk.
Sweet! I'm aiming for the Lakeshore Slate, but it seems like it'll be rare. How would you describe the new Slate Blue? I don't like the deep blue tone of the current twilight blue. Any pics?
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 08:31 PM
  #22  
GarciaCars's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: NM
Blue Slate looks like a real dark gray. I think there will be plenty of Lakeshore Slate out there...it has been a good seller for dealers. I ordered a few on my first allocation.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #23  
John105's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by trebien
John105 - not necessarily. That 2001 M5 is valued around $35K or less... about the same or less than a G35. And it will probably depreciate much slower as well, even though maintenance (and possible repairs) would be higher. I would cross-shop those attributes... and am.

My point was more this... that M5 (stock) tends to get to 60 in about 4.8 seconds, and the 1/4 mile in about 13.3. That's faster than the G35, no doubt... but not that much faster than the 5.2 and 13.9 ON A BRAND NEW ENGINE that C&D just posted. Of course the M5 is faster, but my point is that basically it's a great time to be alive and love sports cars when entry level sedans are posting numbers like this. With the old G35, getting under 14 seconds in the 1/4 mile was very rare... with this new model, I think 13.8 or so will be the new lower limit in stock config. That's impressive, while having as much space as a 5 series and getting 19/27 mpg. It also weighs about 400 pounds less than the M5, so with suspension tweaks, should do quite well. I can't wait to really flog a G35 and see what the handling is like compared to the older model - if you read between the lines of many of the reviews, what they are saying (without saying) is that the new G35 has some impressive handling and roadfeel.

The new M5 is even more of a monster, no doubt. But we should be really impressed with what Infiniti is bringing to the table, as far as tech gadgets, performance and handling for well under $40K... on par with highly praised cars of just a few years ago. That's all...
I'm not sure where you're getting your pricing, but my cousin is shopping for a 2k2 M5, and it is in the 43-46k ballpark. A person who is willing to spend that much for a 5 yr. old car is imho rich. Not phased when told front brakes will be $1800, or a routine maintenance is $800. Many people buy new BMWs because maint. is included for 4/50k. Someone shopping for a used M already knows they will be adding much more $$$ for maintenance. A 2k7 G35 should be problem free for a long time, and cost about 10 grand less than a 2k2 M5, that's why I feel they're not even comparable in any way. just my .02....
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
netcbc
Exterior - Body Parts CDN
2
Aug 21, 2015 09:50 AM
laksjd84
Exterior - Body Parts
1
Jul 24, 2015 05:12 PM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
Jul 24, 2015 11:25 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 PM.