G37 Coupe V36 2008+ Discussion about the G37 Coupe

G37 Tech Specs, Features & Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #91  
frshgcoupe's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: long island
sounds like someone needs a change of pants!
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #92  
dennisjai's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
asdsddasdas
 

Last edited by dennisjai; Apr 6, 2007 at 11:10 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #93  
SPEEED's Avatar
Bad Toro
Staff Alumni
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,576
Likes: 0
From: Stamford, CT
Great post Shane. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #94  
Waz's Avatar
Waz
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Sun/Moon Roof

I thought a moonroof only tilts, but a sunroof can slide open (or tilt).
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #95  
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
In some of the previous literature, they mentioned a more refined 6-speed transmission. I initially was excited as that seems to be the only lasting sticky point with the G (refinement).

The final drive changed to 3.69, which was different than the 07 Z and 07 G coupe. That gave me some confidence that the tranny would finally change - but I just noticed that the 07 sedan has the same final drive ratio. DOes this mean that the "more refined" 6-speed is actually just an improvement over the old coupe, but not necessarily "new" as it is in the sedan already?
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #96  
RBull's Avatar
Rated M
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 6
From: Nova Scotia, Canada
Premier Member

Originally Posted by muscarel
In some of the previous literature, they mentioned a more refined 6-speed transmission. I initially was excited as that seems to be the only lasting sticky point with the G (refinement).

The final drive changed to 3.69, which was different than the 07 Z and 07 G coupe. That gave me some confidence that the tranny would finally change - but I just noticed that the 07 sedan has the same final drive ratio. DOes this mean that the "more refined" 6-speed is actually just an improvement over the old coupe, but not necessarily "new" as it is in the sedan already?
Good question. The revised rear drive ratio in both suggests there is a chance another part of the drivetrain (trans) will also be the same.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #97  
GT-Ron's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 1
From: Texas
The literature also uses "new" or "refined" in conjuction with "lightweight" to describe the 6MT, which gives me hope of more significant improvement over the current 6MT. Doesn't help much, but it does appear that there were some significant revisions. I never remember the current 6MT being described as "lightweight"... ...although it's not exactly robust either.

I can't wait for good reviews of the production-model 6MT... ...or a test-drive of my own to determine the difference.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #98  
muscarel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GT-Ron
The literature also uses "new" or "refined" in conjuction with "lightweight" to describe the 6MT, which gives me hope of more significant improvement over the current 6MT. Doesn't help much, but it does appear that there were some significant revisions. I never remember the current 6MT being described as "lightweight"... ...although it's not exactly robust either.

I can't wait for good reviews of the production-model 6MT... ...or a test-drive of my own to determine the difference.
The more I think of it, the more I believe it's the same unit from the '07 sedan. DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe. Especially now that I see the gear ratios changed to match that of the sedan. I think alot of items are probably a carryover from the sedan but are considered "new" or "revised" because they are comparing it to the previous coupe. Not necessarily new for the G line.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #99  
finagle69's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by muscarel
The more I think of it, the more I believe it's the same unit from the '07 sedan. DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe. Especially now that I see the gear ratios changed to match that of the sedan. I think alot of items are probably a carryover from the sedan but are considered "new" or "revised" because they are comparing it to the previous coupe. Not necessarily new for the G line.
This is exaclty how i read it. much the same as "36% stiffer suspension"; stiffer than that of the existing coupe, not the new sedan.

of course your argument of "DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe" can be disproved by looking at the engine change
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #100  
mal_TX's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FAST1
I defined low end by being under 5K RPM. If you spend all your time driving at redline, then you're in that .00000001% that I alluded to. Most car owners don't like to have to drive at 7K RPM to experience a car's power, especially when the price of a gallon of gas is approaching $3 again. If you aren't impressed by the 335, then you are in a tiny minority again.
You burn plenty of fuel accelerating hard in a very torquey car at low RPMs.. nearly the same as revving high. So yeah, let's forget about the "gas prices" thing.. I could understand if people don't want to rev high because it is loud or whatever, but it doesn't have THAT much to do with the fuel consumption.

Winding the motor up quickly (at low or high revs) is what uses the fuel. The high revs just use a little more due to increased friction, but not nearly as much as you imply.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 06:12 PM
  #101  
mal_TX's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by finagle69
This is exaclty how i read it. much the same as "36% stiffer suspension"; stiffer than that of the existing coupe, not the new sedan.

of course your argument of "DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe" can be disproved by looking at the engine change
The increase is stiffness refers to the chassis -- the car itself is 36%-40% stiffer depending on which article you are reading. Suspension may or may not be stiffer.

When I had an 07 G sedan as a loaner, the increased chassis stiffness was an OBVIOUS improvement in the car's behavior.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #102  
tmac911's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Does any1 know what the interior would look like without NAV?
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #103  
Yimbie's Avatar
Yin-Yang and Life
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by tmac911
Does any1 know what the interior would look like without NAV?
Same. The screen is still there. The nav buttons are just changed.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 07:21 AM
  #104  
indiandrives1's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Great to know this guys.......
 
Reply
Old May 24, 2020 | 12:42 AM
  #105  
juliofbz47's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
2008 infiniti g35
Vdc

I heard turning off the VDC button still won’t allow for drifting/donuts.
Is this true?
 

Last edited by juliofbz47; May 24, 2020 at 02:07 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
John6mt
Media Share G35 Coupe V35
39
Apr 1, 2009 06:01 AM
Kidcane
G37 Coupe V36 2008+
25
Aug 6, 2007 03:20 PM
Queens350z
NorthEast
33
Aug 6, 2007 01:38 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.