Intake & Exhaust Questions and info regarding various aftermatket exhaust systems for the G35 (Headers,Y-Pipes, and Cat-Back Systems)

LOSS POWER DUE TO POOR COSTUME PIPING..please help!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #31  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
I just looked at you mod list, and I think OC already pointed this out, you have got a lot of intake and exhaust work with no noted tuning. Adding that exhaust was probably the straw that broke the camels back. With all those mods, your car is most definitely running lean and when that happens, there will be more detonation (which you won't hear) and the ECU will flake out and dump a lot of fuel to drop cylinder temps. In the end, you get crappy performance.

You keep saying those bends are killing your power, but don't forget those kinds of stretch bends make the pipe more oval, than round, and don't really impact the overall volume of the pipe.

Also, the lightened flywheel isn't helping things either.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 09:35 PM
  #32  
gary c's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 19,433
Likes: 1,133
From: Valencia, Ca
Power Loss vs Torq vs Pipe Diameter....?

I believe when Da Red G originally posted pic of his exhaust I mentioned the
poor quality of the pipe bends. Of course when you have pipe that is crimped
you're going to lose HP and the only way to know how much is to put the
car on a dyno before and after. Everything else is all guess work, not fact.
Our cars require 2 1/2" pipe as well as the same size in the mufflers inlet and
out let....no restrictions! The only time 3" pipe is needed would be with FI
and pushing major HP. There's a bunch of high HP/Torq cars out there using
nothing more than the 2 1/2" pipe. Company's like HKS and Magnaflow spend
hundreds of hours testing what works best, why shouldn't we believe them?
Gary
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #33  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by gary c
I believe when Da Red G originally posted pic of his exhaust I mentioned the
poor quality of the pipe bends. Of course when you have pipe that is crimped
you're going to lose HP and the only way to know how much is to put the
car on a dyno before and after. Everything else is all guess work, not fact.
Our cars require 2 1/2" pipe as well as the same size in the mufflers inlet and
out let....no restrictions! The only time 3" pipe is needed would be with FI
and pushing major HP. There's a bunch of high HP/Torq cars out there using
nothing more than the 2 1/2" pipe. Company's like HKS and Magnaflow spend
hundreds of hours testing what works best, why shouldn't we believe them?
Gary
Motordynes new exhaust will have variation... I can't remember what all Tony has posted, so I'm not commenting on anything specific (in case he hasnt posted details yet) - other than some ideas he mentioned to me way back... it's not straight 2.5" the whole way.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #34  
Da_ReD_G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
had the car diagnosed and car is not running too lean but not too RICH... i do need a tune and thats what i been saving up for now... i just going to put the other exhaust system on the car...few months the car will be tuned with osiris...
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #35  
Da_ReD_G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
btw the lightened flywheel helped a ton in tq'er feeling or better words more responsive....i notice it more probably once i put that other system on it then osiris is to come...maybe 6 months down the road ill do a forged high compression N/A build
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 10:53 PM
  #36  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Da_ReD_G
had the car diagnosed and car is not running too lean but not too RICH... i do need a tune and thats what i been saving up for now... i just going to put the other exhaust system on the car...few months the car will be tuned with osiris...
very odd - unless the ECU is compensating by adding fuel - generally it pulls timing when the knock sensors detect detonation, I'm not savvy enough to know if this would cause added fuel too... its hard to understand how all the breather mods you have could result in too rich.

How was it "diagnosed"?
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 01:53 AM
  #37  
Da_ReD_G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
scanned wasnt running rich just wasnt running too lean to where its unsafe
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 01:56 AM
  #38  
Da_ReD_G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
DOESNT THE flywheel help if im not mistake isnt suppose to help the tq a lil and the throttle response??

just need to put the other exhaust on for a better exhaust flow which will help more since i did just break in my clutch n flywheel??? i need to install my ichiba header maybe even consider adding aps 2.5 testpipes instead of the 2.25 i have now.
 

Last edited by Da_ReD_G; Jul 27, 2008 at 02:02 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 02:32 AM
  #39  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by Da_ReD_G
DOESNT THE flywheel help if im not mistake isnt suppose to help the tq a lil and the throttle response??
Yes, it helps throttle response, but it totally neuters the car's 0 to 30mph acceleration. Lightened flywheel are ideal for cars that race on a road course where a launch and 0 to 30mph isn't crucial. A lightened flywheel makes it easier to rev match which is very important to a raod racer where chasssis balance is key. The purpose of a flywheel is to store energy. Lighten it up and you reduce the stored energy, making the car much harder to launch effectively.
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #40  
Da_ReD_G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
damn it makes sense daveb i see what you mean cause when i launch it seems like to LAUNCHES HARD then evens out quickly then at WOT it kicks back in and by 2nd gear till 5th that **** is coming done the street FAST....

You think i should upgrade to 2.5 test pipes n slap the headers on it
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 12:22 AM
  #41  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Actually if your clutch is disengaged all the way, the acceleration should be better.

Lightflywheels make it harder to launch and maybe shift as there's less kinetic energy stored but other than that, you should feel it rev faster.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freeman186
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
1
Sep 6, 2023 10:07 AM
Thebaws11
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
3
Jul 2, 2021 11:36 AM
alessandro
G35 Cars
4
Oct 8, 2015 09:29 AM
zcherub
G35 Coupe V35 2003 - 07
2
Sep 10, 2015 12:03 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.