KurumaZ vs. Kenstyle ... Which front bumper is lower? - Page 2 - G35Driver

Nov 21, 2007 | 04:45 AM

#16

Triple8Sol

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (151)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 7,288

Likes: 0

From: Seattle, WA

^ Anyone?

Nov 22, 2007 | 05:59 PM

#17

Joeyisahoss

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 48

Likes: 0

From: Dallas, TX

honestly idk.. you should go kuruma anyways

urethane ftw.

Nov 23, 2007 | 02:34 AM

#18

Triple8Sol

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (151)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 7,288

Likes: 0

From: Seattle, WA

Hopefully someone can chime in with some pertinent info...

Nov 23, 2007 | 09:37 AM

#19

HenryLee

Registered User

iTrader: (48)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 6,233

Likes: 168

From: SoCal & Florida

Kuruma Z goes a little past the factory mudflaps.. but barely noticable.. The Kenstyle is pretty much even with mudflaps.. def love the way kenstyle looks.. you should do the whole KS kit... love the whole look with the sideskirts and rear..

Jan 29, 2008 | 03:47 AM

#20

Triple8Sol

Thread Starter

Registered User

iTrader: (151)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 7,288

Likes: 0

From: Seattle, WA

I like the Kenstyle front/sides, but hate the rear. That shit belongs on a Civic.

Local member just compared his authentic Greddy to his KurumaZ. 2" difference.

Now if someone can just tell me the difference between the Kenstyle and either of those!