4300K vs 6000K

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #1  
Godfather's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
4300K vs 6000K

I cant seem to pick which i want to buy, 4300HID or 6000HID. I think the oem is usually 4300K.
what do you guys think?
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #2  
Deepdiver's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,643
Likes: 187
From: So Cal
do you want looks or performance?
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #3  
J2S2M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 61
From: Irvine, CA
4300k is the OEM which does offer more light output than the 6000k. However 6000k looks much better IMO b/c it's more "whiter" w/o the hint of yellow.

Plus the light output lost is not going to be really noticeable. I'd go w/ the 6000k HID.
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #4  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by J2S2M
4300k is the OEM which does offer more light output than the 6000k. However 6000k looks much better IMO b/c it's more "whiter" w/o the hint of yellow.

Plus the light output lost is not going to be really noticeable. I'd go w/ the 6000k HID.
25+% isn't noticeable?
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
visibiliti's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Richland, WA
wow, the light output lost is def noticeable w/ 6000k... and more "whiter" ??? 6000k is much "bluer"..!

To the OP.... go 5000K!!! its the best
 
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #6  
Godfather's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
I'm looking more for light output and performance is the last thing. So 6000K is not going to work! 5000 would be sweet, it will be middle of 4300 and 6000k.

I;m going to place an order from either retrosolutionsllc or XenonDepot. Retrosolution offers 55W/lifetime warranty along with 35W. My car is currently running halogens which are 55W stock, so im guesing 55W HID wont heat up.

"55 watt HID that uses 55w bulbs still runs cooler than a 55w halogen bulb it generally replaces, to replace any other lower wattage halogen bulb we recommend 35w instead. So 35w or 55w, properly installed, stands less risk of melting housings than the bulb they replace"

However both compainese are well known, i'm leaning towards 55W just because of the light output, but just not sure if i should play it safe n get the 35W.

Sorry for the long post...
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 03:00 AM
  #7  
J2S2M's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 61
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by redlude97
25+% isn't noticeable?
If you do most of your driving in the city where there is plenty of street light, 6000k will provide sufficient amount of light output for daily driving.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 03:14 AM
  #8  
redlude97's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by J2S2M
If you do most of your driving in the city where there is plenty of street light, 6000k will provide sufficient amount of light output for daily driving.
Sufficient is not the same as noticeable. Halogens are sufficient as well
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:49 PM
  #9  
LightsOut's Avatar
SIETESG
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,784
Likes: 6
From: So. Cal (323)-(909)
Premier Member

found this website prices seem fair i think. and they also have 5000

http://intensehid.com/d2c.html
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 04:54 PM
  #10  
maclovio's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 357
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
I'd go 6000k. They look sweet And on my projectors, can't wait to get mine...... But go to the meets and check out some of the other fellow G drivers cars that have HID's.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #11  
Oh Itz Joel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Originally Posted by visibiliti
wow, the light output lost is def noticeable w/ 6000k... and more "whiter" ??? 6000k is much "bluer"..!

To the OP.... go 5000K!!! its the best

Definitely go 5000k, which is natural white, no yellow nor blue. i put my in about 2 weeks ago, really good lights,

2003-2006 Reflectors
2007+ Projectors

http://www.aftermarketbulbsshop.com/...phi-cm-d2s.htm
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #12  
JAYY-G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,648
Likes: 8
From: SoCal / San Diego
6000k ftw!
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:41 PM
  #13  
RADIOGUY21's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 16
From: Schaumburg, IL
4300K or 5000K. 6000K is getting too blue imo. The most lumens (visable light output) you will get will be from 4300K bulbs.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 05:41 PM
  #14  
Law to the Rence's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 5
it all comes down to this:
white with a hint of blue or blue with a hint of white?
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #15  
Godfather's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
So i ended up just placing an order with retro-solutions.com . The customer service was A+. I went with the 55W 5000K, The reason i decided against the 6K was cuz i want to keep my car close to stock.

I will post pictures soon as i get something
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.