it's not the 19s

^What do you think?? There are stock Xs that ran faster times than this...

what tires did you buy? What sizes?

whats your 60' time?

Falken FK452s 245/40/19 all the way around.
Best run of the day, which was a 14.950@95.91mph had a 60' time of 2.475. Terrible. My reaction time was .401. Also terrible.

245-40-19 is larger than the stock size.(rear specifically) But at least the Falkens should be alot lighter than the rock RE050s. 255-35-19 is what I run (rear) and is a smiggen smaller than the oem size (which is where I'd much rather error)

Do you have pics of them on your car?

They aren't any wider than my oem re050s. I think the older sport pilots in 255s actually run a touch thin for their size. Or the re050s run wider. I dunno.

Yea maybe. I like 245s on the front because it fills the wheel gap a bit..

hmm, I ran 14.6, i was on stock 17's though, but your 19's couldnt have slowed you down that much, especially rays...did you launch?

too much dead weight!!!

what did the hondas have? swap engines? bolt ons?

On that track on that day? What's your altitude there? No expert here, but may have been just a poor density-altitude day. Could also be launch, shifting technique, several things.

It was partially the 19s. My sub, and the way i launched. I also had a lot of weight in the car.
Idk my friend was all into them. I heard snipits like k20, b16 turbo, mugen, idk all this honda talk
We are fairly low. THere were quite a few things that affected it.

haha, lol freaking hondas