Northern California San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, San Jose, Pleasanton, etc.

New 2008 California Driving Laws

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #16  
jen n juice's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,514
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Originally Posted by G-MENTED
people actually text while driving?

hehe
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 01:24 AM
  #17  
sfgr415's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco
Originally Posted by GxR0ckstar
hehe
no excuses... haha...
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 11:33 AM
  #18  
g35 chippie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by gary c
They don't need to raise the license fees! After July 1st they'll have tons of
revenue from the citizens that will continue to use their hand held cells...
The money from citations goes to the city where the violation occurred. So local PD's and Sheriffs will write this alot to get revenue for their city or county. They money from the ticket does not go to the state. Raising registration fees is one of the ways CA generates revenue (so they can pay me my raises). The ticket that helps me personally is to write people for expired registration. Or to write people who move to CA and never register their cars here in CA.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #19  
Disco_Monkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (30)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by g35 chippie
The money from citations goes to the city where the violation occurred. So local PD's and Sheriffs will write this alot to get revenue for their city or county. They money from the ticket does not go to the state. Raising registration fees is one of the ways CA generates revenue (so they can pay me my raises). The ticket that helps me personally is to write people for expired registration. Or to write people who move to CA and never register their cars here in CA.
Doesn't the State AND City generate a large amount of revenue from DUI's?
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #20  
Coreman's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: West San Jose, CA
Is there a law about driving with animals in the front seat? Sister-in-law got hit by a lady who's dog jumped onto her lap...lady swerved...then bam!
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #21  
g35 chippie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by Disco_Monkey
Doesn't the State AND City generate a large amount of revenue from DUI's?
Not sure 'zactly how the money for that gets divided. As far as I know, the fine still goes to the city where the violation occurred. In the report and on the ticket we still write the city where it happened, or unincorporated if in a county pocket. If someone crashes their car because they are under the influence, we (CHP) fill out a form that totals up all the hours from every officer that assisted in the investigation. The drunk then gets to pay the state back for every officer's time. This includes investigation, arrest, traffic control, vehicle storage forms, report writing time, etc. It's billed out at about $73/hour.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #22  
g35 chippie's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by Coreman
Is there a law about driving with animals in the front seat? Sister-in-law got hit by a lady who's dog jumped onto her lap...lady swerved...then bam!
No specific law regarding that. Basic speed law may be appropriate. What's the safe speed for driving with a dog in your lap? 00 MPH? Might work. Other than that, this is the only one I know:

23117. (a) No person driving a motor vehicle shall transport any
animal in the back of the vehicle in a space intended for any load on
the vehicle on a highway unless the space is enclosed or has side
and tail racks to a height of at least 46 inches extending vertically
from the floor, the vehicle has installed means of preventing the
animal from being discharged, or the animal is cross tethered to the
vehicle, or is protected by a secured container or cage, in a manner
which will prevent the animal from being thrown, falling, or jumping
from the vehicle.
(b) This section does not apply to any of the following:
(1) The transportation of livestock.
(2) The transportation of a dog whose owner either owns or is
employed by a ranching or farming operation who is traveling on a
road in a rural area or who is traveling to and from a livestock
auction.
(3) The transportation of a dog for purposes associated with
ranching or farming.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #23  
Big Rob's Avatar
Never gone
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (14)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,514
Likes: 21
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by G-MENTED
people actually text while driving?
Yes, they do! And these people scare me more that one ones driving 15-20 miles slower because they are talking on the phone.

Texting while driving FTMFL!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #24  
PTownG's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 2
From: Pleasanton, CA
isn't the cell phone fine only $25?

I'd rather see it be $100 or more. The majority of the population can't walk and chew gum at the same time much less drive and hold a phone to their head.

I have an 06 with blue so I'm all good.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #25  
Disco_Monkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (30)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
I can't stand it when people are on cell phones while driving. I think they should just make the fine $5000 then do away with parking fines. =)
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #26  
sfgr415's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 3
From: San Francisco
seems like almost every time I have been hit is when the other driver is on a cell phone.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #27  
Disco_Monkey's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (30)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sfgr415
seems like almost every time I have been hit is when the other driver is on a cell phone.
Yeah back in 05 when I was still riding my bike, I was just riding along and this girl on a cell phone just turned out in front of me and stopped to make a u-turn (illegally btw). I didn't have time to brake so I had to swirve hard right and give it throttle just to miss her by inches. I was wearing full gear (helmet, gloves, 1-piece leathers, back protector) but I still could've been crippled or killed. And "close calls" are very common when you ride a motorcycle. 90% of those close calls was due to the other driver doing something in the car that is distracting them!
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #28  
Kris79's Avatar
battle froggy
iTrader: (56)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,991
Likes: 4
^^^ thats why i gave it up lol
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #29  
nimdivino's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, Ca
Originally Posted by G-MENTED
people actually text while driving?
I'm guilty as charged.. hehehe.. But atleast I can write text without looking in the screen.


niM
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2008 | 06:40 PM
  #30  
calcul8's Avatar
I can haz potato?
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,234
Likes: 1,024
sabertooth tiger
Premier Member

Originally Posted by nimdivino
I'm guilty as charged.. hehehe.. But atleast I can write text without looking in the screen.


niM
Super dangerous, but I admit to having done the same from time to time (city driving only, one hand always on the wheel, at stop signs/traffic lights) - I use one-character-at-a-time input so I don't have to fumble around and look down at the phone to see if the predicative text typed the right thing.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:59 AM.