Aerial Pesticide Spraying This Coming Summer
#1
Aerial Pesticide Spraying This Coming Summer
Here's an advanced notice/warning for some of you. Especially, for those whom are prone to asthma attacks . . . Please read the following article.
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/30749
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/30749
#10
Well, with regard to our personal safety/health, the article doesn't read so well for some. The following and other parts of the article should raise many eyebrows.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture obtained an "emergency exemption from registration" from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that allows the agency to use the pesticide in aerial sprays over California cities. Because of that exemption, the spraying program isn't subject to state approval, according to representatives of the state Department of Pesticide Regulation.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture obtained an "emergency exemption from registration" from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that allows the agency to use the pesticide in aerial sprays over California cities. Because of that exemption, the spraying program isn't subject to state approval, according to representatives of the state Department of Pesticide Regulation.
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This seems a little overblown to me. Take a look at the label for the product (it's the LBAM-F variant of the Checkmate product family):
USDA web site - http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_heal...ate%20LBAM.pdf
CA Dept. of Food and Agriculture - http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lb...AM_F_label.pdf
It looks like it's approved for use in California, though not yet nationwide. Assuming that the state has approved the labeling (which seems likely, as drug/chemical labeling generally tends to be subject to regulation), then the state has cleared the product for areas including "all residential and municipal areas."
As far as the federal side goes, it seems probable that the product is still undergoing the approval process.
I'm not trying to dismiss any concerns about this product, but let's keep this in perspective.
More info at:
http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lbam/lbam_main.html
http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Search_Products.jsp
USDA web site - http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_heal...ate%20LBAM.pdf
CA Dept. of Food and Agriculture - http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lb...AM_F_label.pdf
It looks like it's approved for use in California, though not yet nationwide. Assuming that the state has approved the labeling (which seems likely, as drug/chemical labeling generally tends to be subject to regulation), then the state has cleared the product for areas including "all residential and municipal areas."
As far as the federal side goes, it seems probable that the product is still undergoing the approval process.
I'm not trying to dismiss any concerns about this product, but let's keep this in perspective.
More info at:
http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lbam/lbam_main.html
http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Search_Products.jsp
#12
#13
Originally Posted by TonyK
This seems a little overblown to me. Take a look at the label for the product (it's the LBAM-F variant of the Checkmate product family):
USDA web site - http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_heal...ate%20LBAM.pdf
CA Dept. of Food and Agriculture - http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lb...AM_F_label.pdf
It looks like it's approved for use in California, though not yet nationwide. Assuming that the state has approved the labeling (which seems likely, as drug/chemical labeling generally tends to be subject to regulation), then the state has cleared the product for areas including "all residential and municipal areas."
As far as the federal side goes, it seems probable that the product is still undergoing the approval process.
I'm not trying to dismiss any concerns about this product, but let's keep this in perspective.
More info at:
http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lbam/lbam_main.html
http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Search_Products.jsp
USDA web site - http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_heal...ate%20LBAM.pdf
CA Dept. of Food and Agriculture - http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lb...AM_F_label.pdf
It looks like it's approved for use in California, though not yet nationwide. Assuming that the state has approved the labeling (which seems likely, as drug/chemical labeling generally tends to be subject to regulation), then the state has cleared the product for areas including "all residential and municipal areas."
As far as the federal side goes, it seems probable that the product is still undergoing the approval process.
I'm not trying to dismiss any concerns about this product, but let's keep this in perspective.
More info at:
http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lbam/lbam_main.html
http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Search_Products.jsp
When it comes down to the health of my family, I find that the article breeds many questions and concerns. Five years of spraying . . . Would you allow your kids to be be exposed to this stuff?
Hundreds of people whose homes and yards were sprayed in Santa Cruz and Monterey counties from September to December have filed reports that said the pesticide seems to have caused coughing, wheezing, muscle aches and headaches, among other symptoms. One Monterey family reported that a child had a first-time asthma attack.
State officials say the amount of pesticide applied shouldn't pose severe health risks, but they've also refused to rule out that the spray can affect humans, particularly sensitive people such as children and the elderly.
Before its use in Santa Cruz and Monterey last year, the pesticide, a hormone that throws off the scents of mating moths, had been used aerially only over farms and never over populated areas.
More than 600 people from the two counties have reported symptoms, including asthma attacks, bronchial irritation, lung congestion and soreness, difficulty breathing, coughing and eye and throat irritation.
Dr. Randy Baker, a family practitioner in Soquel, said he treated about a dozen patients with a range of symptoms when the area was being sprayed. Although he said there was no way to ascertain a cause-and-effect relationship, he had a number of concerns about the pesticide, including the fact that it was not tested for use over urban areas.
My parents are getting up there in the years. I have many young nieces and nephews. Ummmm . . . I believe that I have the proper perspective.
#14
I can haz potato?
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by Andy2434
When it comes down to the health of my family, I find that the article breeds many questions and concerns. Five years of spraying . . . Would you allow your kids to be be exposed to this stuff?
My parents are getting up there in the years. I have many young nieces and nephews. Ummmm . . . I believe that I have the proper perspective.
My parents are getting up there in the years. I have many young nieces and nephews. Ummmm . . . I believe that I have the proper perspective.
#15
Don't get me wrong, Nate. If the spraying is warranted, then spray away. However, the local government and the regulatory agencies had better figured out what happened to all of those people down in the Santa Cruz and the Monterey regions. Spraying prior to that would simply be irresponsible and criminal.