Pics with the new wheels
So if you are running a neg camber setting that's only good at some extreme peformance level, ask yourself, did you actually help/hurt your car's performance? (because 95% of the time, you won't be at that level where performance "might" be marginally improved). Remember, handling is about contact patch.
Don't want to argue but just pointing out that you changed your focus from negative camber to stretched tires. FinallyGotaG responded to your comment on negative camber not improving handling and that is false in itself. The G35 comes from the factory with negative camber as well as a plethora of other sport cars like the 350z, m3, evo, etc. I'm sure you will not find a single article that says negative camber will hinder a car's handling, even with everyday driving.
Now the stretched tire look I can respect your opinion but just wanted to say that your initial comment on negative camber is what warranted the reply, not stretched tires.
Now the stretched tire look I can respect your opinion but just wanted to say that your initial comment on negative camber is what warranted the reply, not stretched tires.
im also not a fan of the super stretch tire, i like driving fast
OP, car looks fantastic, great stance!
That's because they are performing at some extreme level to warrant it. Up to that point, they might be actually hurting performance. (as they might not care how it performs under that limit).
So if you are running a neg camber setting that's only good at some extreme peformance level, ask yourself, did you actually help/hurt your car's performance? (because 95% of the time, you won't be at that level where performance "might" be marginally improved). Remember, handling is about contact patch.
So if you are running a neg camber setting that's only good at some extreme peformance level, ask yourself, did you actually help/hurt your car's performance? (because 95% of the time, you won't be at that level where performance "might" be marginally improved). Remember, handling is about contact patch.
lmao jkjkjkjkjkjkjk
wrong...I stated facts. And then it went even further OT when GW brought up stretched tires. Which that I was not disagreeing with.
Bottom line is. extreme camber for extreme conditions. you are correct. however OP doesnt have extreme camber and that was the point that I was making....his camber will benefit "fun" daily driving conditions
unsubscribed
Bottom line is. extreme camber for extreme conditions. you are correct. however OP doesnt have extreme camber and that was the point that I was making....his camber will benefit "fun" daily driving conditions
unsubscribed
They remind me of the wagon wheels you used to see on 4X4s in the 80s and 90s.
Not a fan of the negative camber look either. It does nothing for handling and makes the car look cheap. Drop is perfect and overall stance looks pretty dialed in.
My opinion doesn't mean beans. If it makes you happy and pleases your eye then it's perfect. Overall, I think it's a good looking ride.
Not a fan of the negative camber look either. It does nothing for handling and makes the car look cheap. Drop is perfect and overall stance looks pretty dialed in.
My opinion doesn't mean beans. If it makes you happy and pleases your eye then it's perfect. Overall, I think it's a good looking ride.
It might all been good fun. Sure. But like I said, you did it at the expense of your perceived knowledge on the subject. Just my view
what is the point you're trying to make?
or are you arguing for the sake of arguing cause that is pretty much the ONLY thing you do on this forum
OP doesn't have extreme camber...GW said camber does nothing for handling...
I stated that racecars have camber for handling proving that camber benefits handling...
do you want me to admit i was wrong because you have some kind of superiority complex??? get over it!
or are you arguing for the sake of arguing cause that is pretty much the ONLY thing you do on this forum
OP doesn't have extreme camber...GW said camber does nothing for handling...
I stated that racecars have camber for handling proving that camber benefits handling...
do you want me to admit i was wrong because you have some kind of superiority complex??? get over it!
just because you have read and probably contributed to every argument about handling issues on this forum doesnt mean that I dont know what IM talking about..
yes you are right about the line between extreme and normal conditions...
im right about the facts that I stated...
where is the argument?
Um wasn't it you that was arguing with GW just for the sake of making an arguement? Because it SURE looked like you stuck that statement about race car camber to goad GW into some debate completely OT of what GW commented on. (well yeah, you actually admitted this)
Yes, you might know about handling. You just didn't illustrate it in any way, shape or form in THIS discussion. ie.. "perceived intelligence".
It's good that shop "learned you" though.
*Jeff is giving you a hard time on that*
Yes, you might know about handling. You just didn't illustrate it in any way, shape or form in THIS discussion. ie.. "perceived intelligence".
It's good that shop "learned you" though.
*Jeff is giving you a hard time on that*
Last edited by Jeff92se; Oct 8, 2010 at 03:21 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
911Turbo
19 Inch
10
Aug 24, 2016 08:31 AM
