Hey I got some new dyno numbers..
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by Lawy'dU
well, most coupes baselike around 223, this probably isn't necessary....
The only thing ninous26 can do with these numbers is compare it with other G35's/350Z's that have dyno'd on the same machine in similar conditions.
That's why its so important to always get a stock baseline dyno if you plan on modifying the car

.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 5
From: Doucheville AZ
Ok well there was an 03 350Z 6MT that dynoed on that same dyno about 30 minutes before me
his numbers were 243 WHP and 239 TQ
His mods were:
Top speed cat back exhaust
top speed test pipes
Injen CAI
unorthodox pulleys (set of 3)
I have no idea what gave him 20 more ft lbs of torque than me.. Could it be the 6MT?
his numbers were 243 WHP and 239 TQ
His mods were:
Top speed cat back exhaust
top speed test pipes
Injen CAI
unorthodox pulleys (set of 3)
I have no idea what gave him 20 more ft lbs of torque than me.. Could it be the 6MT?
Originally Posted by ninous26
Ok well there was an 03 350Z 6MT that dynoed on that same dyno about 30 minutes before me
his numbers were 243 WHP and 239 TQ
His mods were:
Top speed cat back exhaust
top speed test pipes
Injen CAI
unorthodox pulleys (set of 3)
I have no idea what gave him 20 more ft lbs of torque than me.. Could it be the 6MT?
his numbers were 243 WHP and 239 TQ
His mods were:
Top speed cat back exhaust
top speed test pipes
Injen CAI
unorthodox pulleys (set of 3)
I have no idea what gave him 20 more ft lbs of torque than me.. Could it be the 6MT?
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 5
From: Doucheville AZ
neither had a tune... Maybe he dynoed in a different gear.
He told me that his pulleys did not gain him anything but he gain 4 MPG so he was happy w/ that.
He told me that his pulleys did not gain him anything but he gain 4 MPG so he was happy w/ that.
Originally Posted by ninous26
neither had a tune... Maybe he dynoed in a different gear.
He told me that his pulleys did not gain him anything but he gain 4 MPG so he was happy w/ that.
He told me that his pulleys did not gain him anything but he gain 4 MPG so he was happy w/ that.
Its very doubtful that pulleys will give better mpg BTW.
Edit: nevermind... it was someone else that suggested the pulleys...
breather mods (especially HFC or Test Pipes) can cause lean condition and pull timing... when fuel is added trq/hp is gained... I guess its possible that his ECU adapted and yours did not
Did either of you get a/f readings when you dyno'd?
Last edited by OCG35; Jun 22, 2008 at 04:34 AM.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 5
From: Doucheville AZ
Originally Posted by OCG35
didn’t you say earlier you thought his pulleys were the reason he had 20 lbs more trq than you?...
Its very doubtful that pulleys will give better mpg BTW.
Edit: nevermind... it was someone else that suggested the pulleys...
breather mods (especially HFC or Test Pipes) can cause lean condition and pull timing... when fuel is added trq/hp is gained... I guess its possible that his ECU adapted and yours did not
Did either of you get a/f readings when you dyno'd?
Its very doubtful that pulleys will give better mpg BTW.
Edit: nevermind... it was someone else that suggested the pulleys...
breather mods (especially HFC or Test Pipes) can cause lean condition and pull timing... when fuel is added trq/hp is gained... I guess its possible that his ECU adapted and yours did not
Did either of you get a/f readings when you dyno'd?
yes the a/f readings are posted in the first post.. second attachment.
Any help as to why he has 20 more tq would be greatly appreciated
ok this is messed up
i have an 06coupe auto
on paper is 280 hp and 270 tq
are you saying with your mods, u dynoed at 240 and 220?!?!?!
wtf!!
so with bone stalk its like 230whp!? and 215tq!?
that cant be right, we can lose that much from crank to wheel!
is that possible to lose that much? can someone please enlighten me!
i have an 06coupe auto
on paper is 280 hp and 270 tq
are you saying with your mods, u dynoed at 240 and 220?!?!?!
wtf!!
so with bone stalk its like 230whp!? and 215tq!?
that cant be right, we can lose that much from crank to wheel!
is that possible to lose that much? can someone please enlighten me!
^^Sorry to say it, but it's old news. With the autos you're looking at an average of about 20% loss and 15% for the 6mt. I don't know how this still surprises people considering every other thread is about this stuff.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




