Stock exhaust with X or H pipes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #31  
AesonVirus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (62)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 85
From: Central MA
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
No it happens because when you have a properly designed X pipe, the pulses (not flow!) though one side will actually create a small vaccuum in the other side (pulling the other side's exhaust though the cylinder) accelerating the velocity and getting the exhaust out faster. This is why X/H pipes typically help low end torque.
This is how I understood it as well.
I may be wrong here, but my understanding of the difference between the H and X-pipes was that the H was a little quieter, but the X-pipe was a little more efficient with this affect.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #32  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

I don't know which is quieter. The X pipe should have noise canceling abilities because the sound is being thrown against each other.

But with the X pipe, you have the option of using a resonated X like magnaflow offers along with the traditional "X" that you are thinking of. Whether or not a resonated X is quieter than a H alone? Don't know.
 
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #33  
Csquared's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 1
From: Madison, WI
From what i read, somewhere, the X is more efficient, but has higher probability of rasp, while H pipe is not as good as the X, but tends to have a deeper exhaust note, no idea.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #34  
hrp783's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: ATX, TX
u think the H is deeper then having no X/H/Y?

i drove it around yesterday, and i like it (w/o any interconnection between the pipes) its deep, not rasspy a lil louder.

seems like the engine breathes much better...
the way i see it, could be wrong, we have 2 throttle bodies, air flows in each side of the engine, then the exhaust is flowing out of a single pipe, with all stock parts.

someone said its like having two 3 cylinder engines... so shouldn't this make more power? there is enough resistance in the flow to control back pressure.

when i turned it on this morning, and when u can see the smoke coming out, it seemed to be pretty equal, reved the engine to see and it seems to be good.

i can feel the power, get up n' go.

i wish i could find out with a dyno.

oh well either way i can have it fixed.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #35  
mishmosh's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 73
From: NE Ohio
Saw this on the Flowmaster site:

Do I need to install an "H" pipe in my dual exhaust system?

Flowmaster strongly recommends using a crossover tube, otherwise known as an "H" pipe or balance pipe on all true dual exhaust systems. The crossover pipe equalizes the exhaust pulses and allows the sounds waves to communicate between both banks of the engine. Not only does this usually improve torque in the low to mid rpm range, it also creates a deeper mellower tone both inside and outside of the vehicle and helps eliminate "back-rap" on deceleration.

Is an "X" pipe better than and "H" pipe?

Over the years, Flowmaster has performed extensive testing of all types of crossovers and “X” pipes, and has revealed no substantial benefits of one over the other in street applications. We have experienced that some specialized race applications such as small cubic inch engines and /or restricted (small bore) carburetors, will respond well to the addition of an “X” pipe over an “H” pipe.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #36  
hrp783's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: ATX, TX
Interesting... i guess i should have that l-l put on.


thanks for all the info guys
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #37  
Csquared's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 1
From: Madison, WI
Interesting stuff!
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #38  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

http://www.streetdirectory.com/trave...ore_power.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #39  
crazystand's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
So everybody pretty much seems to be in agreement that getting rid of the stock y pipe would be beneficial. Is there a bolt on available? I looked though some of the threads and didn't see anything listed. Maybe FI could sell just the X pipe portion of their exhaust?
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:29 PM
  #40  
Csquared's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 1
From: Madison, WI
Yeah, the stock pipe is designed to reduce noise more than anything i guess, i think y pipes give the most low down torque as well. I don't think FI would just sell the X portion because you need the rest of their exhaust kit or it won't connect to the mufflers, you could just buy the magnaflow X they use and get a mufflershop to put it in for you.
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #41  
crazystand's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Csquared
I don't think FI would just sell the X portion because you need the rest of their exhaust kit or it won't connect to the mufflers, you could just buy the magnaflow X they use and get a mufflershop to put it in for you.
That's what I figured. Got a part number?
 
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:39 PM
  #42  
Csquared's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 1
From: Madison, WI
Nope, not as of right now hahaha I'm at the library, if i find it i'll let you know.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2009 | 11:49 AM
  #43  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by EnviedG35
Cost mostly. An X would have been more than double what i paid for the H. This isnt a 502 big block engine and i dont plan on going FI anytime soon. To me, it didnt seem necessary for an X considering the CFM's being expelled by an N/A 3.5 v6. After further reading into X vs H pipes, i found that in some cases an X pipe can introduce more rasp into an exhaust and often reduced low end grunt. As long as the exhaust pulses are equal on both sides of the engine then thats all the matters really, so in the end, i decided an H pipe was best for the vehicle and for my daily driving needs. There was a noticeable difference in sound, but good sound, and no drone haha.

Heres some videos of before and after

Before
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnsgrZOTIbY

After with H pipe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KYT-Fm33DU

And some pics.




after doing some research, I say this might be a good idea. I'm reading that the H pipe is actually turning out to be better for low end and the X excells in the high end. Depends on what you are looking for.

But for the cost, it certainly cheaper/easier to try this first. Then go to a X if one doesn't like the result.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2009 | 12:51 AM
  #44  
G35driver101's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
14385
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 12:48 PM
  #45  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by G35driver101
14385
I just ordered mine.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.