V36 General Tech Questions Questions and Posts that Do Not fit under the other Tech catagories

Dyno Run: Stillen and JWT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 01:39 AM
  #16  
AlterZgo's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by ttrank
The only way to get true un-biased results is to reset the ECU after each intake change. The car will learn the characteristics of the intake and if you make a sudden change like that it can throw off the results.
I used to believe one should always reset the ECU after any performance mod, but a wise mechanic pointed out to me the fact that our cars' MAF are already designed to compensate for a wide range of atmospheric conditions and adjust fuel, timing, etc. as needed so it's pointless. The air density difference between a hot day and a cold evening would be much greater than that between the OEM, Stillen and JWT intakes.

Even assuming the ECU adjusts to your mods or driving style, by resetting to baseline, it would not give you a real world result as once you start driving it for a short period, it would adjust away from baseline anyway.

Regardless of whether the ECU is reset or left as is, in either case, the 3 intakes are being tested under the same ECU parameters.

As for what's the most objective way to test mods such as this, Dinan Engineering has the best article I've seen on how a controlled test should be run. Check it out. It's a fantastic article and gives me more appreciation for why Dinan charges an arm and a leg for even their basic mods:

http://www.dinancars.com/bmw/technia...ern-bmw-engine

Check out the ridiculous turbine fan they use as compared to the typical Costco special floor fans you see in most dyno shops.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #17  
johnnyzee's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 13
From: Toronto
^true...

let's all admit it, for once, a manufacturer did a good job on their intake and there is little to no room for improvement (maybe a K&N drop in).

The only reason I've seen for intakes on the G is the sound which to some is worth the slight loss in HP/trq.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #18  
KulG35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 4
From: Yorba Linda (Orange County)
Originally Posted by sredish
what's up with that purple run on the JWT, why the inconsistency with it? Also, why the one page the one run of each? You used the highest stock graph, highest Stillen graph and the middle JWT graph. Just a little confusing. And what's with the spikes, they're showing up in both charts.

Did you get the car up and running pretty warm and run a bunch of test runs to get consistency then start the testing? I'm not sure 3 runs on each is enough. They should've all been ran until they provided consistent results back to back being sure the car had time to adjust for the differences.
Not sure why the jumps at the end... the reason I picked the Middle JWT was because I tried picking one that was closer to an average... the highest JWT was the last run we did, the JWT kept gaining. I will make another appointment to go in an dyno the JWT after I have it on for 1500 miles are so for the ECU to learn to see if there is a difference in relearning.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #19  
KulG35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 4
From: Yorba Linda (Orange County)
Originally Posted by kool_yaar
Hey Kul, really appreciate to see you taking the time and money to do these runs and show it to the community, however i will have to agree with ttrank in saying you should have atleast dissconnected the battery between each intake change to achieve more consistant results. You will be suprised by the difference it makes to the dyno once the ecu learns a bit.

You want all 3 runs of one mod to be AROUND the same point while yours on one intake shows difference of 20hp(stillen 275->255->274) to 18tq (jwt 258->248-244)difference that does not do justice with the mods.

Just my $0.02...
Battery was disconnected everytime... however I'm sure the 3 runs were not enough to learn... I will try to go in again after I have the JWT on for awhile and see if there is a difference from these runs.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #20  
KulG35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 4
From: Yorba Linda (Orange County)
Originally Posted by dofu
Thanks but I have access to a Mustang AWD dyno, a Dynojet, and a Dynapack.
where you live, want to dyno me for free
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #21  
KulG35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 4
From: Yorba Linda (Orange County)
Originally Posted by AlterZgo
I used to believe one should always reset the ECU after any performance mod, but a wise mechanic pointed out to me the fact that our cars' MAF are already designed to compensate for a wide range of atmospheric conditions and adjust fuel, timing, etc. as needed so it's pointless. The air density difference between a hot day and a cold evening would be much greater than that between the OEM, Stillen and JWT intakes.

Even assuming the ECU adjusts to your mods or driving style, by resetting to baseline, it would not give you a real world result as once you start driving it for a short period, it would adjust away from baseline anyway.

Regardless of whether the ECU is reset or left as is, in either case, the 3 intakes are being tested under the same ECU parameters.

As for what's the most objective way to test mods such as this, Dinan Engineering has the best article I've seen on how a controlled test should be run. Check it out. It's a fantastic article and gives me more appreciation for why Dinan charges an arm and a leg for even their basic mods:

http://www.dinancars.com/bmw/technia...ern-bmw-engine

Check out the ridiculous turbine fan they use as compared to the typical Costco special floor fans you see in most dyno shops.
LOOONG READ, but a DAMN GOOD article! thanks!
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #22  
sredish's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 918
Likes: 3
From: Chandler AZ
Originally Posted by KulG35
Not sure why the jumps at the end... the reason I picked the Middle JWT was because I tried picking one that was closer to an average... the highest JWT was the last run we did, the JWT kept gaining.
absolutely it was still gaining because you only did 3 runs and it was still adjusting. the way to test on the dyno is to run and run and run until the lines become 100% consistent, until the lines start to mesh together; this is where the product is making it's peak. So, that highest JWT is probably the most accurate and there was probably some more still left on the table, for all of them. Reason the stocker went so high was because the car was probably most used to it and was adjusted for it.

Usually, when we're testing products, we'll end up doing hundreds of runs to get consistency. You should probably have 15 to 20 runs for each one of those intakes, allowing the car to cool in between.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #23  
kool_yaar's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,208
Likes: 185
From: Somewhere
^+1 if you saw the JWT gaining that shows that the car was adjusting to it and showing gains, thats good.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #24  
dofu's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,822
Likes: 242
From: Silicon Valley
Originally Posted by KulG35
Battery was disconnected everytime... however I'm sure the 3 runs were not enough to learn... I will try to go in again after I have the JWT on for awhile and see if there is a difference from these runs.
There will be a difference just because temp and weather conditions are different each day. 3 hard pulls should be more than enough for your ECU to relearn. The problem with this like Dinan's article stated is heat... you want to let the car cool down for at least half an hour after every 3 pulls at the least.
 

Last edited by dofu; Aug 31, 2008 at 03:12 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #25  
KulG35's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 4
From: Yorba Linda (Orange County)
Originally Posted by dofu
There will be a difference just because temp and weather conditions are different each day. 3 hard pulls should be more than enough for your ECU to relearn. The problem with this like Dinan's article stated is heat... you want to let the car cool down for at least half an hour after every 3 pulls at the least.
i had the cool down because it took about 30 to install parts
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 06:14 PM
  #26  
g35man04's Avatar
CLUB MODERATOR
iTrader: (280)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,976
Likes: 152
From: Denton, Texas
Originally Posted by ttrank
The only way to get true un-biased results is to reset the ECU after each intake change. The car will learn the characteristics of the intake and if you make a sudden change like that it can throw off the results.
that was the reason behind my comment that I made Ttrank!
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #27  
sredish's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 918
Likes: 3
From: Chandler AZ
Originally Posted by dofu
3 hard pulls should be more than enough for your ECU to relearn.
I disagree and the fact that the JWT was still gaining as he said backs that up. I'm not saying that it takes x or y number of times before it adjusts but I will say, you know it's there when it begins to produce back to back to back consistent, matching runs, and 3 runs is not enough to do that, I'd say more like 8 or 10 or so.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #28  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Assuming they all had proper cool downs after every 3 runs, it looks like they all made about the same power & torque (the 250+ tq runs were skewed by the "spike").

.
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 01:39 AM
  #29  
EWG35's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
You should average the three runs, or take the highest run on each. The JWT has the higher power and torque according to your 9 runs. Maybe only by 4 hp 1 fp torque , but it is higher. You said it has the lowest torque and middle HP.

JTW 280.26 / 258.93 - Best run HP and Torque!
Stock 276.04 / 257.97 - Best overall run
Stillen 274.90 / 253.57 - Best overall run

Interesting that Stillen is worse than stock. That's a waste of money.

Originally Posted by KulG35
Stillen had the middle hp, best sounds, least hp.
JWT had the middle hp, more subtle sound, and least torque.
Stock had the most hp, normal sound, most torque
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2008 | 01:47 AM
  #30  
rookie's Avatar
Former G35driver Vendor
iTrader: (19)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 5
From: OC
Originally Posted by KulG35
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J6he1fEbKo

jwt... if anyone intested I have the dyno programs to make charts off whatever you want to see... also recorded at least one of each run.
send me the drf? will pm you email address.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.