Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

Avon M550 Tech & Fuel Mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #1  
davistld01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO.
Avon M550 Tech & Fuel Mileage

Anybody running Avon M550 Tech 235/50-17 All-Weather tires on their sedans that have noticed a distinct drop in fuel mileage? I love the tires, and they are a HUGE improvement over the stock RS-A's, but it seems like I am getting a lot worse gas mileage. Why?
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #2  
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter
iTrader: (57)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 27,305
Likes: 190
From: Phoenix
Premier Member

Never even heard of them...?
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
RXM's Avatar
RXM
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 2
From: Burbs of Philly
Had the opposite effect on my sister's car. MPG went up significantly.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #4  
jimNC's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 299
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Hmm, I'll have to check - I have the same tires in the same size. I haven't noticed a big difference but I can't say I've checked either. I've had these tires for about 6 months now. I'll have to check next time.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 05:24 PM
  #5  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by davistld01
Anybody running Avon M550 Tech 235/50-17 All-Weather tires on their sedans that have noticed a distinct drop in fuel mileage? I love the tires, and they are a HUGE improvement over the stock RS-A's, but it seems like I am getting a lot worse gas mileage. Why?
It's because the 235/50R17s Avon M550 weigh 5lbs more a piece than the OEM spec 215/55R17 Avon 550. The 235s also have a 1" wider contact patch. Adding 5lbs in rotational weight, especially weight furthest from the hub, is the absolute worst weight you can add to a car. The additional tread width doesn't help either. I wouldn't be surprised if MPG was impacted by 2mpgs or so.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...e1=yes&place=0

215/55R17 26lbs, tread width 7.6", section width 8.9"

235/50R17 31lbs, tread width 8.6", section width 9.5"
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #6  
mikeee2's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 4
From: New York
I have them in 245/45/18 from the stock turanza 215/55/17. I think mpg is about the same. It's horrible to begin with. Till today I get about 17 mpg . My friend's Honda Pilot gets better mpg than my car. Go figure...the pilot is like 4,000+ lbs I think.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #7  
GEE35FX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,045
Likes: 36
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by mikeee2
I have them in 245/45/18 from the stock turanza 215/55/17. I think mpg is about the same. It's horrible to begin with. Till today I get about 17 mpg . My friend's Honda Pilot gets better mpg than my car. Go figure...the pilot is like 4,000+ lbs I think.
But Bobby, the G is a lot more fun to drive than a ho-hum Pilot .
Excellent points made by DaveB as to why the MPG difference.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 17, 2006 | 06:04 PM
  #8  
mikeee2's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 4
From: New York
Originally Posted by GEE35X
But Bobby, the G is a lot more fun to drive than a ho-hum Pilot .
Excellent points made by DaveB as to why the MPG difference.
Wayne...true true

Yeah, it's hell more fun than a pilot of course. That thing floats on the highway like there's no tomorrow. Doesn't feel safe at all...
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #9  
ballisticus's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
I had the 550's in stock 215/55/17 and had no difference in MPG. The 225/45/18 Yoko's are about .5" smaller in ID and no difference there either. Gets 22-24 MPG every fillup.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 03:52 AM
  #10  
MrCrazy's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
No difference here. I went from Goodyear Eagle GS-D to Avon M550 A/S. The only complaint I have about the 550 is the weak sidewalls (the car exhibits more body roll in the 550s). Both tires were 215/55 on the sport suspension (2004) 17" rims.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #11  
shads's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: NW Boston suburbs
Just a thought, check your tire pressures.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #12  
davistld01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO.
Tires are on 37-lbs. which I increased from the 32-lbs. the installer put in to "lighten" the streering a little. I just checked the pressure yesterday, and all is well. The tires "feel" noticeably heavier, and the steering response is a little slower so the more rolling mass = less fuel mileage makes some sense. I am not sure how much worse the mileage is, but I'll bet it's down 4mpg or so.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #13  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by MrCrazy
No difference here. I went from Goodyear Eagle GS-D to Avon M550 A/S. The only complaint I have about the 550 is the weak sidewalls (the car exhibits more body roll in the 550s). Both tires were 215/55 on the sport suspension (2004) 17" rims.
A lot of that stems from the fact that the GS-Ds are summer-based true high performance rubber. The 550s have to handle the snow so the rubber compound, tread, and often times the sidewall strength is compromised. I'd love to get summer hi-po tires, but I can't thanks to the 15-30" of snow we get every year.
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #14  
soaped's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
I use to have Avon Tech 550 AS on my 17 sports and got about 22/23 mpg per fill up. Not bad!
 
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 12:26 PM
  #15  
lieb923's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Phila. PA
Tires & Gas Mileage

My previous car had Michelin tires OEM a low rolling resistance tire. I replaced them with a high performance summer tire and my gas mileage dropped 10% but my smile factor went up 100%. High performance tires have a larger tire patch and higher rolling resistance. It's all a trade off.

'06 G35X stock in Philly.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.