Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110 vs Falken FK 452
#1
Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110 vs Falken FK 452
Hello All,
As per the title states what is the better choice?
I am replacing all 4 on my 2005 g35 coupe with the 19" sport-tuned package;
Sizes are 225/40/19 Fronts
245/40/19 Rear
Any recommendations or advice is appreciated.
Is this the only size I can go with since I have the 19" wheel package?
Looking to save $$$ while longevity is key.
Thanks,
Jeff
#2
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
#3
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
#4
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
#5
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
#7
Trending Topics
#8
just asked a friend about the falken 452's vs. the hankooks. apparently the hankooks are semi-notorious for having squishy sidewalls, which sometimes leads to air loss. either way, i got my falkens in yesterday and should have them installed very very soon, i'll let you guys know how the ride is.
#10
#11
imo the Hankooks are a better choice than the Falkens. As someone mentioned earlier the V12's sidewall is on the soft side. Do yourself a favor and take a look at the Vredestein Sessanta's. They def should be on your short list.
https://g35driver.com/forums/wheels-...ome-tires.html
https://g35driver.com/forums/wheels-...ome-tires.html
#12
#14
I would get the Hankook V12's over the 452's. I'am on my second set of V12's and they have been a solid tire and they are well priced. The 452's have been known to have their sidewall fail. The V12's grip well in dry and wet conditions. But, the sidewall seems to be a bit soft. Hit up City tire in Southgate. They have great prices.
Last edited by Lone Wolf; 06-02-2013 at 11:57 PM.