Wheels & Tires Grabbing the road and stopping.

Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110 vs Falken FK 452

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-17-2011, 09:07 PM
haastyle.1's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 3
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110 vs Falken FK 452


Hello All,

As per the title states what is the better choice?
I am replacing all 4 on my 2005 g35 coupe with the 19" sport-tuned package;

Sizes are 225/40/19 Fronts
245/40/19 Rear

Any recommendations or advice is appreciated.
Is this the only size I can go with since I have the 19" wheel package?
Looking to save $$$ while longevity is key.

Thanks,

Jeff
 
  #2  
Old 08-17-2011, 09:11 PM
JBF's Avatar
JBF
JBF is offline
Registered User
iTrader: (46)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Willow Springs, CA
Posts: 7,968
Received 686 Likes on 365 Posts
Falkens will last slightly longer but the Hankooks are an overall better tire.
 
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
  #3  
Old 08-17-2011, 11:45 PM
Xet's Avatar
Xet
Xet is offline
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sj
Posts: 4,197
Received 171 Likes on 143 Posts
I have the falken's and I'm not a big fan of them.
 
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
  #4  
Old 08-18-2011, 12:14 AM
g35844's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Santa Clarita
Posts: 313
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Im am not happy at all with my Falkens, i have about 10k miles on them and they make alot of road noise...I was happier with my kumho tires before, but I am going with the hankooks next.
 
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
  #5  
Old 08-18-2011, 12:15 AM
G35er06's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 215
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Go with the Hankooks you won't regret it, also you might want to consider the Nitto Invo which are excellent too.
 
The following users liked this post:
haastyle.1 (08-18-2011)
  #6  
Old 08-18-2011, 12:44 AM
ajkVQ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: DTLA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
this makes me sad, i'm getting 452's tomorrow
 
  #7  
Old 08-19-2011, 12:48 PM
neal@tirerack's Avatar
PLATINUM SPONSOR
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 29 Posts
Can't say much on the Falken as we don't carry them. However, the V12 has been very successful. I've not had a complaint on that tire yet and it performs great for the money.
 
  #8  
Old 08-19-2011, 12:51 PM
ajkVQ's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: DTLA
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts
just asked a friend about the falken 452's vs. the hankooks. apparently the hankooks are semi-notorious for having squishy sidewalls, which sometimes leads to air loss. either way, i got my falkens in yesterday and should have them installed very very soon, i'll let you guys know how the ride is.
 
  #9  
Old 08-19-2011, 12:51 PM
infinitig35's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
I have the Hankooks with about 30K miles, still running pretty good.
 
  #10  
Old 08-19-2011, 12:58 PM
irishsig's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,288
Received 51 Likes on 48 Posts
DO NOT GET THE FALKEN 452s!
The road noise is awful!
The metal frame around my right front speaker is loose now from the vibration of these tires after 6 months of driving.
You will be dissapointed with them.
Go with the Hankooks or some other comparable tire.
 
  #11  
Old 08-19-2011, 01:02 PM
Deepdiver's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 4,643
Received 187 Likes on 140 Posts
imo the Hankooks are a better choice than the Falkens. As someone mentioned earlier the V12's sidewall is on the soft side. Do yourself a favor and take a look at the Vredestein Sessanta's. They def should be on your short list.

https://g35driver.com/forums/wheels-...ome-tires.html
 
  #12  
Old 08-19-2011, 03:43 PM
haastyle.1's Avatar
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 3
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for the great feedback, seems like the Hankook tires are solid for the price point. Now that those are decided time to see what 18" or 19" wheels catch my eyes.
 
  #13  
Old 06-02-2013, 03:51 PM
Phantastik's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 48
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
BUMP, any updates? I need new tires and have some falkens on order($500), but I could cancel it for Hankooks v12s.. Any advice on what I should do?
 
  #14  
Old 06-02-2013, 04:11 PM
Lone Wolf's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fullerton, CA
Posts: 3,982
Received 140 Likes on 129 Posts
I would get the Hankook V12's over the 452's. I'am on my second set of V12's and they have been a solid tire and they are well priced. The 452's have been known to have their sidewall fail. The V12's grip well in dry and wet conditions. But, the sidewall seems to be a bit soft. Hit up City tire in Southgate. They have great prices.
 

Last edited by Lone Wolf; 06-02-2013 at 10:57 PM.
  #15  
Old 06-02-2013, 04:49 PM
Phantastik's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 48
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thank you for your quick response, I am having hearing mixed reviews so I figured I'd ask you guys.
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110 vs Falken FK 452



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.