MRR WHEELS NEW AGGRESSIVE l FLUSH l STANCE WHEEL GF06 CONCAVE 19" !
NEW I MRR WHEELS LINE "GROUND FORCE" 18-19" I CONCAVE WHEEL l FREE SHIPPING!

MRR INTRODUCING THEIR NEW LINE "GROUND FORCE" CATERING TO THE MORE FLUSH FITMENTS, CHECK IT OUT!
LIFETIME WARRANTY ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE WHEEL, +1 YEAR WARRANTY ON THE FINISH OF THE WHEEL
FITMENTS: (GLOSS BLACK l CONCAVE WHEEL!)


SPECS:
GF6 19" 19x85 20 - 45 BK
GF6 19" 19x95 15 - 45 BK
GF6 19" 19x95A 15 - 30 BK
GF6 19" 19x10.5 15 - 40 BK
NEW GroundForce GF7 ! Machine Silver & Gloss black !




SPECS:
GF7 18" 18x8 OFFSET: 15-45 BK / S
GF7 18" 18x9 OFFSET: 15-45 BK / S
GF7 19" 19x85 OFFSET: 15-40 BK / S
GF7 19 19x95 OFFSET: 15-40 BK / S
GF7 19 19x95A OFFSET: 15-40 BK / S
GF7 19 19x10.5 OFFSET: 15-40 BK / S
NEW GroundForce GF8 MATTE BLACK - 10 SPOKE


SPECS
GF8 19" 19x95A 12 - 30 BK
GF8 19" 19x10.5 12 - 35 BK

PLEASE CONTACT US FOR PRICING AND DETAILS!
http://www.mrrwheels.com/
CHRIS L
chrisl@aspecwheels.net
PHONE #: 510-533-3533
Last edited by aspecwheels; Jul 25, 2013 at 04:37 PM. Reason: Editing Title and photos thank you
haha to some customers +15 is fluh/aggressive to other +0 or -offsets are aggressive, depends on the customer
pretty sure 19x9.5 +15 19x10.5 +15 is aggressive on the sedan and flush on the coupe, not everyone wants +0 -15 -20 -5 offsets haha
I run the same specs on my coupe and with meaty tires it is pretty flushish but not perfectly flush (nowhere near aggressive or stanced), running stretched I had 15mm rear spacers and coulve used 10-15m spacers on the front to be flush. This guy is advertising it as stanced and aggressive just to try to catch people's attention and as a gimmick to make sales when they clearly aren't. Pathetic form of false advertising on popular fads to just make a buck.
I run the same specs on my coupe and with meaty tires it is pretty flushish but not perfectly flush (nowhere near aggressive or stanced), running stretched I had 15mm rear spacers and coulve used 10-15m spacers on the front to be flush. This guy is advertising it as stanced and aggressive just to try to catch people's attention and as a gimmick to make sales when they clearly aren't. Pathetic form of false advertising on popular fads to just make a buck.
Anyways back to the thread, was looking to pick these up, waiting for the 19x10.5 pictures i want to see that concavity
Trending Topics
I run the same specs on my coupe and with meaty tires it is pretty flushish but not perfectly flush (nowhere near aggressive or stanced), running stretched I had 15mm rear spacers and coulve used 10-15m spacers on the front to be flush. This guy is advertising it as stanced and aggressive just to try to catch people's attention and as a gimmick to make sales when they clearly aren't. Pathetic form of false advertising on popular fads to just make a buck.
Current setup yes, old more "flush" setup no. But I'm also not nearly as low as I was before, I can clear speedbumps with my new setup
9.5/10.5+15 is what I'm running for the track setup. I'm sure that's aggressive / stance-worthy on some platforms, but not so much on a 350z/G35 coupe. I was running +5s with those widths and no excess camber (-1.5, which if I remember right is still on the edge of in spec) or major fender work, just a roll in the rear (before I actually got carried away with the stance thing).
Good to have options though, and those offsets aren't bad, I'm just not sure I would have labeled them with the words aggressive, stance, or flush, at least for the coupes and 350zs.
Good to have options though, and those offsets aren't bad, I'm just not sure I would have labeled them with the words aggressive, stance, or flush, at least for the coupes and 350zs.
9.5/10.5+15 is what I'm running for the track setup. I'm sure that's aggressive / stance-worthy on some platforms, but not so much on a 350z/G35 coupe. I was running +5s with those widths and no excess camber (-1.5, which if I remember right is still on the edge of in spec) or major fender work, just a roll in the rear (before I actually got carried away with the stance thing).
Good to have options though, and those offsets aren't bad, I'm just not sure I would have labeled them with the words aggressive, stance, or flush, at least for the coupes and 350zs.
Good to have options though, and those offsets aren't bad, I'm just not sure I would have labeled them with the words aggressive, stance, or flush, at least for the coupes and 350zs.
9.5/10.5+15 is what I'm running for the track setup. I'm sure that's aggressive / stance-worthy on some platforms, but not so much on a 350z/G35 coupe. I was running +5s with those widths and no excess camber (-1.5, which if I remember right is still on the edge of in spec) or major fender work, just a roll in the rear (before I actually got carried away with the stance thing).
Good to have options though, and those offsets aren't bad, I'm just not sure I would have labeled them with the words aggressive, stance, or flush, at least for the coupes and 350zs.
Good to have options though, and those offsets aren't bad, I'm just not sure I would have labeled them with the words aggressive, stance, or flush, at least for the coupes and 350zs.


