350z Tein H-Tech or Eibach Pro Kit or ??
#1
350z Tein H-Tech or Eibach Pro Kit or ??
I have an '05 G35 coupe that came with the OEM 19s. I now have Axis Hiros 19x8.5/245-35-19 front and 19x10.5/275-35-19 rears. I want to lower my car a tad with some aftermarket springs mostly for cosmetic reasons, but if handling is improved some, that would be a bonus. I don't mind a slightly stiffer/louder ride - I've had springs on other cars and I actually wouldn't mind a slightly sportier/stiffer ride. My ideal drop would be about .75-1.0 inch all the way around. There doesn't seem to be any springs that accomplish this; either a little less or little more.
I've searched and read the forums for hours and I think I've narrowed it down to the Tein H-Techs for 350z (for larger drop than g35 counterparts) and the Eibach Pro Kit for g35. I really would love to be able to get my alignment very close to spec as well without having to go with aftermarket camber adjusters, etc. With that in mind, I was definitely leaning towards the Teins. However, in a couple posts, mention was made that the '05 G35s with OEM 19s have higher rear spring rates and that the Tein's might not be a good choice? Is this correct? What would decreasing rear spring rate (if that's what would actually happen) do to the handling performance?
Any feedback/input you can offer is greatly appreciated!
I've searched and read the forums for hours and I think I've narrowed it down to the Tein H-Techs for 350z (for larger drop than g35 counterparts) and the Eibach Pro Kit for g35. I really would love to be able to get my alignment very close to spec as well without having to go with aftermarket camber adjusters, etc. With that in mind, I was definitely leaning towards the Teins. However, in a couple posts, mention was made that the '05 G35s with OEM 19s have higher rear spring rates and that the Tein's might not be a good choice? Is this correct? What would decreasing rear spring rate (if that's what would actually happen) do to the handling performance?
Any feedback/input you can offer is greatly appreciated!
#3
#4
Originally Posted by 1nate7
Based on what you want, I would go with RS*R 350Z springs. The next best option would be the 350Z H-techs. Both springs have a more linear rate than Eibach and just slightly stiffer than stock.
Thanks again!
#5
I would go with the 350z H-techs...they are linear front and rear springs...they have just the drop you are looking for, and offer good ride quality for use with the stock suspension (on a coupe). I believe the RS-R springs might be a little lower than what you are looking for. Honestly, for the price, I would get the Tokico/350z H-tech combo from Creative Autoworks. You will have GREAT handling, with the adjustability to customize to your driving habits. JMHO
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by wingnut
Thanks for suggesting these...I completely overlooked them when reading previous posts, but they look like just what I want: a linear spring with about 1" drop and very close to the higher '05 OEM spring rate in rear. I was thinking about spending the extra $80 for the TI to save some weight - you think it's worth it? Also, what's the word as far as quality, crafstmanship, etc. on these springs? I haven't heard much about them.
Thanks again!
Thanks again!
As for Ti springs, I don't really know if they are worth it or not. It would be kind of cool and if you don't mind spending extra then go for it. I did drive a 350Z with the RS*R Ti springs this weekend, and it was noticably stiffer than my Z that currently has the H-Techs. I don't know if there are any differences between the Ti and regular spring rates. I wouldn't call it harsh, but I could feel the bumps more which I actually like.
If you don't mind the bigger drop and more of a chance of camber issues, then I would get the RS*R springs. If you want a more conservative drop, less camber issues, and a slightly more comfortable ride then the H-Techs are the way to go. Either way, I think you will be happy with the performance of either option. If you do decide to get 350Z H-Techs, I will have a set with 10,000 miles on them for sale soon for around $110 shipped.
#9
Originally Posted by nyckid
ok so you guys are saying that the 350z version of the tein s/h-tech springs drops the car lower than the g35 version? or is it the other way around? im confused...
#10
Originally Posted by big daddy d
Post some photos of that badboy! I'd love to see my rims on a coupe.
Puhleeeeeeeese!
Puhleeeeeeeese!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/defurd/sets/867536/
#12
[QUOTE=1nate7]It is my opinion, and also that of others with much more suspension knowledge than myself, that the 350 RS*R springs are probably the best performance oriented spring on the market. I just ordered a set myself (for my 350Z though) and they should be here tomorrow. I haven't heard of any negative quality issues associated with this spring. I don't want to step on sponsors toes, but I found them for $205 shipped which is the cheapest I have ever seen.
Hmmmm....what makes you say that? The spring rates? I agree that a linear spring is the way to go, but the 350z H-techs are linear as well. The Spring rates on the RS-R's are pretty high, and you would be much better off countering them with a set of aftermarket shocks. Then you also have to look at camber issues (a new set of A-arms, and camber arms in the rear), plus added bump-steer, harsher street ride, scraping, adverse effects on the roll-center of the vehicle, etc. Stiff doesn't necessarily mean better, and I think the RS-R's would be great if they didn't lower the vehicle quite so much.
Hmmmm....what makes you say that? The spring rates? I agree that a linear spring is the way to go, but the 350z H-techs are linear as well. The Spring rates on the RS-R's are pretty high, and you would be much better off countering them with a set of aftermarket shocks. Then you also have to look at camber issues (a new set of A-arms, and camber arms in the rear), plus added bump-steer, harsher street ride, scraping, adverse effects on the roll-center of the vehicle, etc. Stiff doesn't necessarily mean better, and I think the RS-R's would be great if they didn't lower the vehicle quite so much.
#13
Originally Posted by khsonic03
Hmmmm....what makes you say that? The spring rates? I agree that a linear spring is the way to go, but the 350z H-techs are linear as well. The Spring rates on the RS-R's are pretty high, and you would be much better off countering them with a set of aftermarket shocks. Then you also have to look at camber issues (a new set of A-arms, and camber arms in the rear), plus added bump-steer, harsher street ride, scraping, adverse effects on the roll-center of the vehicle, etc. Stiff doesn't necessarily mean better, and I think the RS-R's would be great if they didn't lower the vehicle quite so much.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StreetStandard
Suspension-Vendor
9
01-18-2016 03:36 PM
Jiggerjuice
Buying, Selling & Leasing Discussion
3
08-17-2015 08:41 AM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
07-24-2015 11:25 AM