Registered User
Quote:
cusco would've been a no brainer for ppl just wanting neg. camber....
so yea, mark, order the 350evo arms, they're in stock. richard and i ordered them yesterday. $875.
wassup with our returns?
Talked to Peter today and hopefully will have something worked out by tomorrow. I'll keep you posted, btw Peter does know that you and Richard want to return your kits.Originally Posted by Aznteazer
yea i thot the main purpose really of SPC and SPL were for ppl to get in to specs, not run negative camber. cusco would've been a no brainer for ppl just wanting neg. camber....
so yea, mark, order the 350evo arms, they're in stock. richard and i ordered them yesterday. $875.
wassup with our returns?
Registered User
I just got my SPL front kit on, and like some have reported, camber adjust is very tough. I'm lowered ~1-1.5" in the front and the arm will hit the body panel. I had to cut a lil bit and banged that area out, yet it'd still hitting.
Registered User
Quote:
Did you ever resolve this issue? Is this what has been fixed with the "street" version utilizing a shorter ball joint?Originally Posted by ATL_Red_G35
I just got my SPL front kit on, and like some have reported, camber adjust is very tough. I'm lowered ~1-1.5" in the front and the arm will hit the body panel. I had to cut a lil bit and banged that area out, yet it'd still hitting.
Registered User
Quote:
From my understanding, the SPL advantages are 1) a wider positive camber adjustment range (without requiring the hub spacer that the SPC uses), and 2) more clearance (when you get the "street" version) that helps avoid any clunks with large drops after getting back in to alignment spec.Originally Posted by ttrank
I don't see what makes these worth the extra money over the SPC ones.
