Akebono BBK test in mag...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:11 AM
  #16  
gabe3d's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 48
From: Bay Area, Ca
Another thing to keep in mind is how difficult it will be to find wheels that you like and that are lighter by 4-5lbs each. Also the rear rotors are more important as those are the ones where the power goes to.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:16 AM
  #17  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Actually no. Front or back, the motor still has to turn the mass regardless if it's the drive wheels or not. Unless you are doing a wheelie like a dragster.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:31 AM
  #18  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
2pc rears aren't as much of a deal breaker as people make out. to retain the factory parking brake you'll end up w/a design that won't save you much. for example, w/OEM Brembo's the the RacingBrake 2pc rear will only save you 1.5lbs(retains factory parking brake). now the Girodiscs will save you 5lbs but you'll have to trim the pads to clear and it doesn't look like you'll keep the parking brake. i highly doubt it'll be any different for the Akebono kit. the 2pc rear's won't save you much, just hope the front 2pc doesn't end up being too expensive. i went w/the OEM Brembos, small but still baller, LOL. i love the Brembo gold, the Akebono's would deff need a color change. the Brembo's are also a lot lighter.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:34 AM
  #19  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

2 pc rears aren't really the weight savers a 2pc front are. .

with that, I'd love to have the oem brembos on 2pc front and back rotors. Those would be lighter than even the early 11.5" 03 rotors if I'm not mistaken.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:40 AM
  #20  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
yeah, i know... that was my point. everyone is moaning about 2pc rears for the Ake' but it's really not that big a deal. yeah, i'll post up my new setup when it's on. just tryin' to get a few things together before WEKFEST.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:42 AM
  #21  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
Jeff, you have the '06+ brake upgrade right? i've seen Willwood caliper upgrade kits for those.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:44 AM
  #22  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

You are correct. Not really interested in just a caliper upgrade. Most of the improved brake power is in the rotor size upgrade.

But that's an interesting upgrade. Got a link for that?
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:50 AM
  #23  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Big-B...item230438de8b
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 01:36 AM
  #24  
gabe3d's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 48
From: Bay Area, Ca
The reason the rears are more important is because it's basically an extension of the engine's power. Lightening the rotors on the rear is essentially relieving load/weight on the drivetrain. Yes the power provided by the rear will move the car and as a result spin the front. Not saying that lightening the front won't help any, but it's not the same as the rear.

I have the Girodiscs on the front and rear with my OE Brembos. You do need to trim a small section on the pads, but it's not that hard to do with a dremel. You are not removing any pad that comes into contact with the rotor. The parking brakes are preserved.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #25  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
good to hear about the Girodiscs, but yeah the Brembo's aren't that heavy to begin with. you need all the weight saving you can get w/those 20's though. nice build though and sweet lookin' car.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 08:53 AM
  #26  
SDGenius's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,810
Likes: 911
From: Oside, SoCal
also the reason why people "need" front 2pcs is because the fronts are sOoOo heavy on the Ake's. i see what ur sayin' about the rears though.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #27  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by gabe3d
The reason the rears are more important is because it's basically an extension of the engine's power. Lightening the rotors on the rear is essentially relieving load/weight on the drivetrain. Yes the power provided by the rear will move the car and as a result spin the front. Not saying that lightening the front won't help any, but it's not the same as the rear.

I have the Girodiscs on the front and rear with my OE Brembos. You do need to trim a small section on the pads, but it's not that hard to do with a dremel. You are not removing any pad that comes into contact with the rotor. The parking brakes are preserved.
Maybe on a dyno but in real life where the engine has to turn all 4 wheels, it matters. Again, it does not matter what wheels are getting the power.
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #28  
gabe3d's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 976
Likes: 48
From: Bay Area, Ca
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
You are correct. Not really interested in just a caliper upgrade. Most of the improved brake power is in the rotor size upgrade.

But that's an interesting upgrade. Got a link for that?
Most of the improved braking is going to be coming from the increased total surface area covered by the pistons. The larger rotor will help by cooling the rotors faster to improve the friction between it and the pads but that's quite small compare to the first.

Originally Posted by SDGenius
good to hear about the Girodiscs, but yeah the Brembo's aren't that heavy to begin with. you need all the weight saving you can get w/those 20's though. nice build though and sweet lookin' car.
Yeah those 20s are heavy. There is a thread in the tuning section where I and Hydrazine did some separate testing on the effect of heavier wheels if you are interested.

Thanks for the compliment. It'll be sweeter if it's running though

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Maybe on a dyno but in real life where the engine has to turn all 4 wheels, it matters. Again, it does not matter what wheels are getting the power.
Like I said, I'm not saying lightening the fronts won't help but the effect on power is not quite the same as if you were to reduce weight on the rears. This does not change whether it's on the dyno or not, that hunk of mass is still connected to the hub. Anyways, we are getting way off topic and the physical reasoning I gave is still the same as above. We have a difference in opinion and lets just leave it at that. Now if you are talking about braking then yes, the fronts and rears are the same and the less rotating weight you have the faster it'll be to stop.
 

Last edited by gabe3d; Jan 5, 2010 at 10:38 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 11:56 AM
  #29  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by gabe3d
Most of the improved braking is going to be coming from the increased total surface area covered by the pistons. The larger rotor will help by cooling the rotors faster to improve the friction between it and the pads but that's quite small compare to the first.
I disagree. If you increase the piston area too much, it increases the pedal travel. So bbk makers use more pistons but in general keeps the total area somewhat the same. Most of the increased brake power is from the larger rotor dia. Note the Z32 300z used a 4 piston caliper but kept a small 11.2" rotor. The braking wasn't that great. I paired the same caliper with a 13" rotor and the braking forced increased dramaticly. The torque arm advantage is a powerful thing

Like I said, I'm not saying lightening the fronts won't help but the effect on power is not quite the same as if you were to reduce weight on the rears. This does not change whether it's on the dyno or not, that hunk of mass is still connected to the hub. Anyways, we are getting way off topic and the physical reasoning I gave is still the same as above. We have a difference in opinion and lets just leave it at that. Now if you are talking about braking then yes, the fronts and rears are the same and the less rotating weight you have the faster it'll be to stop.
Increased rotor weight on the front won't show on a dyno. But increased rotor weight on either side will have an effect on the power needed to rotate either wheel. Does not matter if it's the powered wheels or not.
Let's say you ride a bike. No problem. Now let's make the front wheel 100lbs. Notice the difference. Now make the rear 100lbs. Why would having the 100lb wheel on the powered axle make a difference? (a significant one anyway)

But the weight differentials of lightening the front is also way more than doing the same with the rear
 

Last edited by Jeff92se; Jan 5, 2010 at 12:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #30  
InTgr8r's Avatar
Staff ALUMNI (retired)
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (23)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 21,095
Likes: 47
From: Toronto, GTA north
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
............
Does not matter if it's the powered wheels or not.
Let's say you ride a bike. No problem. Now let's make the front wheel 100lbs. Notice the difference. Now make the rear 100lbs. Why would having the 100lb wheel on the powered axle make a difference? (a significant one anyway)

But the weight differentials of lightening the front is also way more than doing the same with the rear
I agree.
Whether the front is driven directly or not doesn't matter, you still have to overcome the static inertia of the mass.
It also impacts braking when you have to stop that inertia.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.