All front springs are the same?
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 507
Likes: 18
From: Atlanta, GA
All front springs are the same?
According the sticky, all front springs have the same spring rates. Obviously, the Z springs are a tad shorter and that has an effect on performance, but it seems only the rear springs on the G coupe and Z were stiffened for the sport models and revised?
Oem linear springs
G35 coupes with oem 17’s & 18’s
G35 sedan’s with sport suspension
350Z’s 2003/2004 (unrevised)
Front:314 Rear:342
Oem linear springs
G35 sedan's with non sport
Front: 283 Rear: 308
Oem linear springs
G35 coupes 2005/2006 with oem 19’s only
350Z 2004.5 to 2008 (revised suspension)
Front:314 Rear:427
Oem linear springs
G35 coupes with oem 17’s & 18’s
G35 sedan’s with sport suspension
350Z’s 2003/2004 (unrevised)
Front:314 Rear:342
Oem linear springs
G35 sedan's with non sport
Front: 283 Rear: 308
Oem linear springs
G35 coupes 2005/2006 with oem 19’s only
350Z 2004.5 to 2008 (revised suspension)
Front:314 Rear:427
Last edited by jstudrawa; Feb 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM.
yeah i think you are right.
to my knowledge increasing the rear spring rate while keeping the front the same increases oversteer in corners. So maybe the stock coupe was understeering a bit too much when driven hard. IMO the sport coupe oversteers a bit too much with the stiffer rear springs and the tiny 225 width tires, especially if you ditch the spare/tools/mats in back. Once I moved up to 245's in front it feels like it added back a good amount of understeer in the corners and I feel a bit more in control. At least I think this is how suspension works based on how it feels. I can't tell you what happens when you throw on swaybars and start adjusting them on top of spring and tire width changes.
I think there may be a "butt-chassis" phenomenon equivalent to the "butt-dyno" where I'm subjectively feeling differences that aren't there because I'm looking for them.
to my knowledge increasing the rear spring rate while keeping the front the same increases oversteer in corners. So maybe the stock coupe was understeering a bit too much when driven hard. IMO the sport coupe oversteers a bit too much with the stiffer rear springs and the tiny 225 width tires, especially if you ditch the spare/tools/mats in back. Once I moved up to 245's in front it feels like it added back a good amount of understeer in the corners and I feel a bit more in control. At least I think this is how suspension works based on how it feels. I can't tell you what happens when you throw on swaybars and start adjusting them on top of spring and tire width changes.
I think there may be a "butt-chassis" phenomenon equivalent to the "butt-dyno" where I'm subjectively feeling differences that aren't there because I'm looking for them.
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 507
Likes: 18
From: Atlanta, GA
Thanks, I've been trying to figure out the best way to achieve a moderate drop while keeping the stock feel. I prefer a linear firm feeling.
The biggest issue is the cost and time of trying things out, undoing, buying more, putting it on, etc.
The biggest issue is the cost and time of trying things out, undoing, buying more, putting it on, etc.
on a sport coupe with spacers and 19's I promise only you and the g-owners on this forum who live in georgia will know the difference between a moderate drop and stock. I think I am just going to do swaybars and call it a day. I will enjoy clearing speed bumps and not worrying about uneven tire wear until my stock shocks need replacing (then I'll drop 1inch front 0.6 inch rear b/c of mod bug).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[Texas]: KSport Air Suspension G35/350Z/M35
privatecorye
Steering & Suspension
1
May 31, 2016 01:56 AM
netcbc
Steering & Suspension CDN
0
Jul 24, 2015 11:25 AM





