Canada Serving Canada.

New Brunswick To Ban Cell Phones While Driving

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #16  
4DGS's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (69)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,524
Likes: 981
From: Ontario, Canada
I love this law, I like sneaking up on people on their phone and laying on the horn. Sometimes I look stupid because they don't care and give me the "What the hell are you doing *** hole" look, sometimes they drop their phone. haha.
 
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2010 | 09:29 PM
  #17  
Swivel's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,680
Likes: 161
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
You are learning well, young Grasshopper.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 10:35 AM
  #18  
Swivel's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,680
Likes: 161
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
Well it seems the AB government finally grew a pair and is starting the process. either that or they were just trying to obfuscate a scathing report on provincial workplace safety, but either way, it's a welcome start.

But I can't believe all the crap in the paper today from people saying "there's no proof it works", "it's not enforceable", and my personal favourite "you're infringing on my rights!". Of course people who say this never use words like "infringing", more like texting "ths scks, u r pwning my rites" as they weave across four lanes and mow down little old ladies in wheelchairs.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 11:30 AM
  #19  
STCLAIRWEST's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 24
From: TORONTO
Some people just ruin it for all us
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 11:52 AM
  #20  
anotherOAKg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 625
Likes: 5
From: Oakville
Just a thinking out loud here.

I have my bb hooked up to my system so that when someone calls I can speak to them, hands free.

What difference does it make if I am speaking to someone through my hands free system (aka using a device) and speaking to a passenger?
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 11:57 AM
  #21  
Swivel's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,680
Likes: 161
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
^^ I would say the difference is slight; the Alberta law would allow hands-free but prohibits hands-on talking, texting and other distractions such as eating, reading, putting on makeup and writing/drawing/sketching (LOL). Doesn't say anything about playing the mandolin while juggling 3 running chainsaws and a cat.

You'd think something like "reading" would be obvious, and that education and or common sense would prevent it. But no. I've seen it many times.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 12:01 PM
  #22  
STCLAIRWEST's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 24
From: TORONTO
What about smoking?
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 12:02 PM
  #23  
Swivel's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,680
Likes: 161
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
^^ Depends what, LOL! (I know I don't have to ask you what)
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #24  
Coach's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 12
Originally Posted by anotherOAKg
Just a thinking out loud here.

I have my bb hooked up to my system so that when someone calls I can speak to them, hands free.

What difference does it make if I am speaking to someone through my hands free system (aka using a device) and speaking to a passenger?
A passenger in the car, whether they realize it or not, has a sense of the traffic situation and will instinctively adjust their end of the conversation according to how busy they perceive the driver to be (at least most will ). A person on the other end of a phone doesn't have that sense of what's going on inside and outside the car, and will dictate the pace of the conversation accordingly. That's a lot more distracting to the driver, even hands free. It's all in the timing.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #25  
audiophool's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 6
From: Chestermere (Lake) AB
I don't typically make calls from my Bluetooth in-car system but if a call comes in I'll answer. I tell the caller I'm driving so they know why replies might be slow/odd and keep the convo short as possible.

I KNOW that I suck at driving when I'm talking on the hands-free and don't care if I admit it. Other people THINK they can still drive well but they're deluding themselves IMO.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #26  
rpm&my_G35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 116
From: Waterloo, Ont.
Originally Posted by interalian
I don't typically make calls from my Bluetooth in-car system but if a call comes in I'll answer. I tell the caller I'm driving so they know why replies might be slow/odd and keep the convo short as possible.

I KNOW that I suck at driving when I'm talking on the hands-free and don't care if I admit it. Other people THINK they can still drive well but they're deluding themselves IMO.
I agree, 100%
I know I am a different driver when talking on the BT handsfree so I limit it. I still pull off the road if the conversation is important and requires my attention. Drive or talk...it's one or the other as far as I'm concerned.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2010 | 04:32 PM
  #27  
GEE35FX's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,045
Likes: 36
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by rpm&my_G35
I agree, 100%
I know I am a different driver when talking on the BT handsfree so I limit it. I still pull off the road if the conversation is important and requires my attention. Drive or talk...it's one or the other as far as I'm concerned.
+1, another person here in agreement with this.
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #28  
shilohap's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sudbury,ON
I'm all for cellphone bans in vehicles. Accidents caused by texter's have already killed many people across North American highways. Texting while driving is probably worse than driving drunk.
If I ever get involved in an accident where a person texting causes an accident, they won't have to wait for an ambulance. I will put them in the ER myself.
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #29  
anotherOAKg's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 625
Likes: 5
From: Oakville
Originally Posted by Coach
A passenger in the car, whether they realize it or not, has a sense of the traffic situation and will instinctively adjust their end of the conversation according to how busy they perceive the driver to be (at least most will ). A person on the other end of a phone doesn't have that sense of what's going on inside and outside the car, and will dictate the pace of the conversation accordingly. That's a lot more distracting to the driver, even hands free. It's all in the timing.
What about children in the back? Do we ban that too?
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2010 | 11:13 AM
  #30  
Swivel's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 19,680
Likes: 161
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
^^ No, because that's simply not practical and actually could be covered under driving with undue care and attention, but isn't it better to reduce the distractions that CAN be reduced, and improve traffic safety than to say "we can't reduce all distractions, so let's reduce none"?
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.