Drag NHRA, IDRC, IHRA, NDRA

Little scientific comparison between my old G and the 335i

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #16  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
Hard to argue with 300 ft/lbs of TQ at 1400 rpm.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #17  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by OCG35
I beat HRs - G37s, new sedans (even your buddies Vlad) - but I dont beat 335i.
Ur car is the fastest one from all of them including mine. If u manage a 2.0 60ft time and im sure u will, after u fix that problem that u were suspecting, u should go into high 13s with 1100 ft elevation which plays absolutely no role on the 335 from just the elevation alone. If we run each other by my house, u will be shocked how much difference just the elevation alone makes for the G35s/G37. I would get walked on by ur car with ease.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #18  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by Texasscout
Hard to argue with 300 ft/lbs of TQ at 1400 rpm.
trust me, G35 is fast at higher speeds.
There is a reason that bone stock first gen 6MT beats the IS350 90mph and up. Slippery aerodynamics of the G with aero sedan might play a roll in this as well having 0.26 drag coefficient.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #19  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
Ur car is the fastest one from all of them including mine. If u manage a 2.0 60ft time and im sure u will, after u fix that problem that u were suspecting, u should go into high 13s with 1100 ft elevation which plays absolutely no role on the 335 from just the elevation alone. If we run each other by my house, u will be shocked how much difference just the elevation alone makes for the G35s/G37. I would get walked on by ur car with ease.
get that $500 chip the guy I raced at Irwindale has... it would be no contest then
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #20  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by OCG35
get that $500 chip the guy I raced at Irwindale has... it would be no contest then
I miss the 3rd pedal. That is why i am gonna keep this bone stock.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 06:02 PM
  #21  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by OCG35
get that $500 chip the guy I raced at Irwindale has... it would be no contest then
That's not really the point of the thread though.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #22  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
That's not really the point of the thread though.
no, it was a response to his post
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #23  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Klubbheads
I miss the 3rd pedal. That is why i am gonna keep this bone stock.
dont lie - you know you're a closet AT luver!
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #24  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
This thread has gotten me interested in racing Vlad

Where the hell are the private track events?
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #25  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
Originally Posted by Skaterbasist
This thread has gotten me interested in racing Vlad

Where the hell are the private track events?
he was running 13.8s at Fontana...

are you going to the next street legals? I know you dont like 'em, but the cold weather wont last forever...
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 11:21 AM
  #26  
trey100's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
I've owned both, and can say with confidence that the 335i is WAY faster than my 2004 G35. And not just off the line - all the way up (to as fast as I'd ever want to go on the streets). The magazines support this as well: Look at the 60-100 times. G35's (HR's) typically will do 8+ seconds, while the 335 is low 7 second range. I also ran a best of 14.6 at 98.x mph with my G35 6MT which was pretty typical (on average) for that era of G (please don't post the rare 13.9s that people ran) and a best of 13.6 at 102.x with the 335 (which is also pretty typical of what people are running). That's a big difference.

But I really could care less about drag racing. What is important is that my 335 has NO turbo lag (can't speak for the slushboxes) and has big torque at any speed. On the highway in 6th, I can get real solid acceleration and never shift. My G always felt weak in this same situation. I test drove a G37 6mt recently as well (sedan) and although MUCH better than my old G (and an overall great car), it still didn't have the punch of the 335 6mt.

Regardless of all that, the G does alot of other things better than the 335, including costing alot less. I may switch back once my lease is up depending on how the rates go.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #27  
mIKE's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 7
From: Orange County, CA
If you feel that the 335 has no turbo lag, you need to drive some high horsepower NA cars.

The 335's spool-up time is minimal, but definately noticeable.

As the dyno's show, the 335's top end power is rather weak and drops off as you approach redline, as opposed to the G which continues to gain toward redline and ultimately plateau.

The 335 has a much fatter midrange than a G, but at the top where it matters when you're drag racing, the G does have an edge.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 12:31 PM
  #28  
shabarivas's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 1
whats the point? if the 335 starts modding his ... then you need FI
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #29  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by trey100
I've owned both, and can say with confidence that the 335i is WAY faster than my 2004 G35. And not just off the line - all the way up (to as fast as I'd ever want to go on the streets). The magazines support this as well: Look at the 60-100 times. G35's (HR's) typically will do 8+ seconds, while the 335 is low 7 second range. I also ran a best of 14.6 at 98.x mph with my G35 6MT which was pretty typical (on average) for that era of G (please don't post the rare 13.9s that people ran) and a best of 13.6 at 102.x with the 335 (which is also pretty typical of what people are running). That's a big difference.

But I really could care less about drag racing. What is important is that my 335 has NO turbo lag (can't speak for the slushboxes) and has big torque at any speed. On the highway in 6th, I can get real solid acceleration and never shift. My G always felt weak in this same situation. I test drove a G37 6mt recently as well (sedan) and although MUCH better than my old G (and an overall great car), it still didn't have the punch of the 335 6mt.

Regardless of all that, the G does alot of other things better than the 335, including costing alot less. I may switch back once my lease is up depending on how the rates go.
ur are comparing a stock first gen G vs a 335 which is no contest. The point of this thread is to show that with relatively simple mods on the G will put it in the league of the 335 with strait line acceleration.
Where are u from?

Mike is absolutely right, after 5500 rpm the 335's acceleration stays flat. Maybe early shifting will result in better times.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #30  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by trey100
I've owned both, and can say with confidence that the 335i is WAY faster than my 2004 G35. And not just off the line - all the way up (to as fast as I'd ever want to go on the streets). The magazines support this as well: Look at the 60-100 times. G35's (HR's) typically will do 8+ seconds, while the 335 is low 7 second range. I also ran a best of 14.6 at 98.x mph with my G35 6MT which was pretty typical (on average) for that era of G (please don't post the rare 13.9s that people ran) and a best of 13.6 at 102.x with the 335 (which is also pretty typical of what people are running). That's a big difference.

But I really could care less about drag racing. What is important is that my 335 has NO turbo lag (can't speak for the slushboxes) and has big torque at any speed. On the highway in 6th, I can get real solid acceleration and never shift. My G always felt weak in this same situation. I test drove a G37 6mt recently as well (sedan) and although MUCH better than my old G (and an overall great car), it still didn't have the punch of the 335 6mt.

Regardless of all that, the G does alot of other things better than the 335, including costing alot less. I may switch back once my lease is up depending on how the rates go.
Again, no one is arguing against the fact that a 335i is faster than a stock G35...
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.