Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
View Poll Results: Do you have your engine cover on?
Yes!
70
45.45%
No!
54
35.06%
Yes but it's modded.
18
11.69%
Yes but I'll be removing it...
8
5.19%
No but I'm gonna put it back on...
4
2.60%
Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll

Engine cover or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-28-2007, 09:07 AM
Madelinot's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That cover is just a heat trap, so off it went.
 
  #17  
Old 01-28-2007, 01:00 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Madelinot
That cover is just a heat trap, so off it went.
According to my datalogging, it does not trap any measureable heat.
 
  #18  
Old 01-28-2007, 04:09 PM
sloppymax's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
According to my datalogging, it does not trap any measureable heat.
But wouldn't it measure that temp at the IAT which is built into the maf?
 
  #19  
Old 01-28-2007, 04:25 PM
QuadCam's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
I has my plenum chromed and switched to a 350Z engine cover to show off the chrome!!!

 
  #20  
Old 02-01-2007, 11:03 AM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveB
According to my datalogging, it does not trap any measureable heat.

It does trap a lot of heat and this has been proven many times. It is obvious it traps heat. Use a damn infared temp gauge and measure the manifold temp before the cover removed and after on the same type of temps and driving conditions. It is almost a 40 degree difference.

YOU sir need to quit spewing wrong information.


PS, if it didn't trap heat, then how come the 350Z only covers the front part of the engne for performance instead of sound insulation?
 

Last edited by G35_TX; 02-01-2007 at 11:15 AM.
  #21  
Old 02-01-2007, 11:10 AM
Hi-TechG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pothole Central and still ridin slammed...Boston
Posts: 15,043
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
My cover is currently on but I want to do the half carbon fiber cover with the polished plenum
 
  #22  
Old 02-01-2007, 01:40 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by G35_TX
It does trap a lot of heat and this has been proven many times. It is obvious it traps heat. Use a damn infared temp gauge and measure the manifold temp before the cover removed and after on the same type of temps and driving conditions. It is almost a 40 degree difference.

YOU sir need to quit spewing wrong information.
I've run my G at the track multiple times and have made about 30 passes. There is NO difference in ET and MPH with a scalding hot intake manifold or a cold one. If anything, the car is quicker on the 2nd or 3rd hot lap. BossSho and other avid racers have reported the same exact thing.



PS, if it didn't trap heat, then how come the 350Z only covers the front part of the engne for performance instead of sound insulation?
1) Ummm...it's a sportscar therefore people most likely want to hear the engine.

2) Most luxury-focused cars are trending to plastic clad engine bays

3) And the most obvious, there would be a clearance issue with the strut tower bar and also the hood.
 
  #23  
Old 02-01-2007, 01:48 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
For those of you doing this mod for performance, consider this, the intake temps are measured at the MAF and from there the air fuel ratio and timing tables are calculated. Also, the air moving through the intake manifold is going 10 to 40mph in a span of about 25". Just how much additional heat do you think the air will take on going through such a short run at a high rate of speed. The truth is, if Nissan thought that the intake air was going to be impacts dramatically by the manifold, then they'd collecting the intake temp information in the manifold.

Finally, if by some marvel of engineering, you were able to cool the air 10+ degree from the MAF to the manifold, the car wouldn't run correctly because the ECU would think the ingested air was 10 degrees hotter therefore the A/F ratio and timing wouldn't be correct and the car would be.........SLOWER.
 
  #24  
Old 02-01-2007, 02:56 PM
G35_TX's Avatar
Premier Member

iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Running at the track shows nothing in this type of area. You need to actually be daily driving, sitting at idle for long periods of time to actually allow the temp to go up with not much airflow.

So again your false logic prevails as usual.

Originally Posted by DaveB
I've run my G at the track multiple times and have made about 30 passes. There is NO difference in ET and MPH with a scalding hot intake manifold or a cold one. If anything, the car is quicker on the 2nd or 3rd hot lap. BossSho and other avid racers have reported the same exact thing.





1) Ummm...it's a sportscar therefore people most likely want to hear the engine.

2) Most luxury-focused cars are trending to plastic clad engine bays

3) And the most obvious, there would be a clearance issue with the strut tower bar and also the hood.
 
  #25  
Old 02-01-2007, 05:43 PM
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by G35_TX
Running at the track shows nothing in this type of area. You need to actually be daily driving, sitting at idle for long periods of time to actually allow the temp to go up with not much airflow.

So again your false logic prevails as usual.
Okay, Chief
 
  #26  
Old 02-01-2007, 06:07 PM
ttrank's Avatar
Grocery getter

iTrader: (57)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 27,305
Received 189 Likes on 59 Posts
I vote for the 350Z cover.

 
  #27  
Old 02-01-2007, 06:24 PM
norcal_chan96's Avatar
Premier Member

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SaC TowN, CA
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cooler the air the more molecules u can fit in... The cover is a blanket on top of the motor...
 

Last edited by norcal_chan96; 02-01-2007 at 06:35 PM.
  #28  
Old 03-14-2007, 05:34 AM
advancetek's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oceanside SoCal
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
recently modded 350z carbonfiber

recently threw it on still debating on which plenum/spacer to buy.
 
Attached Thumbnails Engine cover or no?-dscf2227.jpg   Engine cover or no?-dscf2228.jpg  
  #29  
Old 03-14-2007, 07:36 PM
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OC - So Cal
Posts: 17,181
Received 154 Likes on 112 Posts
Another vote for 1/2 cover... modified of course...
 
  #30  
Old 03-14-2007, 07:39 PM
MixturePinoy's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,076
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
mine is on. I love the way it looks. makes the engine compartment looks clean and tidy
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Engine cover or no?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.