Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Couple oil questions...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #16  
Voodoo's Avatar
CCT-we call down the rain
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
I really like the Royal Purple, but the price vs what is gained is not worth it. A lot of syns do just as good of job as Jeff's post infer. The weight of the oil really only comes in to play in cold weather or cold starting. With that even a blended syn would probably work really well most of the time. I am considering changing to a syn blend.

Even if used during racing, when done, you probably would change oil anyway, why spend out the butt for it.....
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #17  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

So you have had your oil analyzed correct? I mean if you are prepared to spend $50 on some racing oil, you should really invest $20 to REALLY see how each oil is holding up.

But if you want the best of the best for a street/strip application, Amsoil is your oil. The 0W-30 has tested very well and actually is designed to live in a street application. But I bet the Mobil 1 was holding up just fine (that is if you engine is working okay which I think it is based on your great 1/4 times)


Originally Posted by Nismo G
Id prefer to have the best of the best rather than the "**** of the ****" if you will. My car is driven about 3000 miles every 3 weeks. in those 3 weeks the car is tracked 3 times and driven pretty hard in the mean time. Lots of highway miles and long distance runs (2 1/2 hours at a time about 6 times a week). I am just looking to switch oils because i feel that the royal purple is really not doing its job. I have used mobil 1, but from what i have read about them in the past couple months it is driving me in the wrong dirrection. I have heard great things about the motul racing and i know the autobacs super GT series use it as a sponsor oil, so it must be good oil.

I just want to know what would happen if i were to run 15w-50 vs 5w30 in my kind of driving conditions.

-Sean
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #18  
Voodoo's Avatar
CCT-we call down the rain
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
Originally Posted by Nismo G
.

I just want to know what would happen if i were to run 15w-50 vs 5w30 in my kind of driving conditions.

-Sean
Based on 50W vs 30W, if the temp is above 50 degrees, I would think you would not notice any difference. 15W is thicker, but with that many miles, I would think that would help seal better. Starting may be harder, with the thicker oil, but the outside temp above 50, you should be alright.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #19  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

IMHO running a warm viscosity that is 50 vs a recommended 30 can't help performance IMHO. Just makes the engine work harder. If you need a 50 to stop any leaks or blowby, you have bigger problems than oil choice
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #20  
Nismo G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 23
From: Austin, Texas
The weather here in florida is very rarely below 50 degrees. The car is in the garage all the time anways (87 degrees according to the thermometer). So start ups in the morning are very rarely going to be below 50 degrees unless it is left outside at a friends house or something. The temperatures wont be above 100 during summer either during start ups, but with those temperatures the engine is going to be extremely hot compared to winter.

The motul is only 7.65 a quart vs royal purple that is 6.99 i would like to try it and see if it is infact any better.

So i should probably just stick with a 5w-30 or a 0w-30 correct?

-Sean
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #21  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

With synthetics flowing so well at cold/hot, it really doesn't matter. But again both of your oils are racing oils. Just because it's for "racing" doesn't mean it's the best choice for your street driver. There are alot of different conditions that street engineered oils have to handle that racing oils do not.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #22  
Voodoo's Avatar
CCT-we call down the rain
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
I would go with the 5-30, may seal a little better and will flow pretty good.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #23  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
for track use, I would still pick M1 0w-40 than Amsoil based on the review/data that Will (Resolute) has gathered. Trust me if GTM trust M1 0w-40 for Turbo/SC engine then that means it is good.



Amsoil 0W-30- A new formulation has come out in 2007 that performs as good as, or even better than, the old one. An excellent oil in terms of protection and stability for oil change intervals up to 10k miles. It is now a thinner oil than before, so I don’t recommend it for the FI crowd or track days

Mobil1 0W-40- A thicker oil with really good to average wear results combine to make it a versatile oil for the daily driver and those who do track days as well. Will hold up well for extended oil change intervals and can be used in any climate.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #24  
Nismo G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 23
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by AthenG
for track use, I would still pick M1 0w-40 than Amsoil based on the review/data that Will (Resolute) has gathered. Trust me if GTM trust M1 0w-40 for Turbo/SC engine then that means it is good.
What about 5w-40 would that be safe to use? i just think with the car having 100K miles on it - it might be a good idea to have a little thickness to prevetn wear...?

-Sean
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #25  
FI'ed G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: NY
Like the other said, the xW- is only for cold start which very helpful when the weather is cold, this help the oil circulate better on cold start (only). Don't be scared of the 0W coz the worst it can happen is that you are not taking advantage of it just like for someone who live in Alaska. Once you got your Engine warm the you're good to go. For Older Engine I rather have heavier oil coz of the wear and tear so I'll stick with the 40's plus mobile1 0w-40 is more of a thin 40's

Edit:

The reason I'm just pushing for m1 0w-40 is that because it is one for mobile1's best performance in particular on our VQ engine (with real data). If you need more info, PM Resolute in my350z coz he's an oil guru.
 

Last edited by FI'ed G; Sep 14, 2007 at 05:16 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:17 PM
  #26  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Athens is spot on

Dang go to the trouble of researching and he doesn't even have the courtesy of reading the thing!
In a 10w-40 for example the 10w bit (W = winter, not weight or watt or anything else for that matter) simply means that the oil must have a certain maximum viscosity/flow at low temperature. The lower the "W" number the better the oils cold temperature/cold start performance.

The 40 in a 10w-40 simply means that the oil must fall within certain viscosity limits at 100 degC. This is a fixed limit and all oils that end in 40 must achieve these limits. Once again the lower the number the thinner the oil, a 30 oil is thinner than a 40 oil at 100 degC etc. Your handbook will specify whether a 30, 40 or 50 etc is required.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #27  
Nismo G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 23
From: Austin, Texas
Alright pretty sure i completely understand it, but before you guys take that seriously the viscosity rating (30,40, or 50) simply state that the oil must efficently operate at a given temperature..in this case 100 degC?

-Sean
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:28 PM
  #28  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Where do you drive bro? The sun?
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #29  
Nismo G's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,244
Likes: 23
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Where do you drive bro? The sun?
haha, ever been to florida during the summer? Basically yes!

-Sean
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 05:32 PM
  #30  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Red Card Crew
iTrader: (24)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 37,810
Likes: 585
From: ɐʍ 'ǝlʇʇɐǝs
Premier Member

Originally Posted by Nismo G
haha, ever been to florida during the summer? Basically yes!

-Sean
Look at your temp again.

But to answer your question, yes those oils at their respective viscosities will efficently operate at summer Florida temps. BUT they won't all flow the same as they are of course diff viscosities.
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.