Rev vs Non-Rev
#1
#4
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
I have a Rev-Up and I don't think there is one IOTA of difference between the two. One has more TQ, and one has more HP. The Rev-Up has a higher red line, but I don't think there is any useable HP/TQ there (until I put on the MREV2 & 5/16" spacer!). I shift at 65-6800rpm. It all works out in the end.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Well, I know the redline on non rev-ups is like 6800 or something. I think revs are 7300 or 7500. Most cars don't make power up to the redline anyway, so if that is the significant difference, then I'd tend to agree that other than fancy verbage, there is none. But, I'm not expert by any means. (hence the post).
#9
#11
Having owned G's with HR and a non-HR engines, I must say that the non-HR is a better match for the G in real world everyday driving. The G 35 is not a light weight sports car, high winding lower torque engines are not the answer. They need torque. The more the better.
Granted the non-HR only has 10ftlbs more torque than the HR, but it delivers a more useful power band than the HR.
Granted the non-HR only has 10ftlbs more torque than the HR, but it delivers a more useful power band than the HR.
#12
having owned g's with hr and a non-hr engines, i must say that the non-hr is a better match for the g in real world everyday driving. The g 35 is not a light weight sports car, high winding lower torque engines are not the answer. They need torque. The more the better.
Granted the non-hr only has 10ftlbs more torque than the hr, but it delivers a more useful power band than the hr.
Granted the non-hr only has 10ftlbs more torque than the hr, but it delivers a more useful power band than the hr.
#13
#14
Having owned G's with HR and a non-HR engines, I must say that the non-HR is a better match for the G in real world everyday driving. The G 35 is not a light weight sports car, high winding lower torque engines are not the answer. They need torque. The more the better.
Granted the non-HR only has 10ftlbs more torque than the HR, but it delivers a more useful power band than the HR.
Granted the non-HR only has 10ftlbs more torque than the HR, but it delivers a more useful power band than the HR.
The VQ35DE makes great torque, but don't have that top-end like the HR/VHR. And its not as if our VQ35DE's are torque monsters to begin with.
#15
So, between the two, is there a REAL WORLD difference? Whether it be performance, reliability, or anything in between, do the motors hold up. I ask because my ONLY experience is with the VQ35DE. It held up fine under what I put it through and I summise that any advancement would be okay; especially given that the next car will not be thrashed upon as my Z was.
I also may want to boost it somewhere down the line. I remember when the Z came out (and maybe two years into it) any type of boosting really required you to reinforce the bottom end whether you planned on making a lot of power or not. APS's TT kit was the only real bolt on kit on the market at the time and that only made about 330-350rwhp at best. I know there's a lot more out there now, and I may not even do all that, but I guess I want to know what I'm in for if I go with an 05+
I also may want to boost it somewhere down the line. I remember when the Z came out (and maybe two years into it) any type of boosting really required you to reinforce the bottom end whether you planned on making a lot of power or not. APS's TT kit was the only real bolt on kit on the market at the time and that only made about 330-350rwhp at best. I know there's a lot more out there now, and I may not even do all that, but I guess I want to know what I'm in for if I go with an 05+