Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Rev vs Non-Rev

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #1  
driftsucky's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 156
From: Rochester NY
Rev vs Non-Rev

I've seen a lot of info back and forth over these two variations of the VQ35DE. Is there a clear advantage of one over the other? Just curious because I've been looking at 03's and 04's and I like 06's and up but only cuz of intelli-key. Just curious. Thanks in advance.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #2  
Rphillips6487's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
From: So.NH/Boston
to each his own, before my 06 rev up went FI, i raced non rev ups a lot just as modified as mine and id win by a car every time
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #3  
lilindienplaya's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 967
Likes: 9
From: Winnie, Texas
i hear the rev-up have like 10 odd more HP but it burns excessive oil.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 11:23 PM
  #4  
Texasscout's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 35,605
Likes: 2,116
From: South Texas
I have a Rev-Up and I don't think there is one IOTA of difference between the two. One has more TQ, and one has more HP. The Rev-Up has a higher red line, but I don't think there is any useable HP/TQ there (until I put on the MREV2 & 5/16" spacer!). I shift at 65-6800rpm. It all works out in the end.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #5  
civic4982's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 3
not much diff. in my opinion
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 03:55 AM
  #6  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
no difference acceleration wise. It has been proven.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 04:02 AM
  #7  
JOKER's Avatar
CLUB MODERATOR
iTrader: (24)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,084
Likes: 348
From: earth
what is the redline diff?
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 09:11 AM
  #8  
driftsucky's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 156
From: Rochester NY
Well, I know the redline on non rev-ups is like 6800 or something. I think revs are 7300 or 7500. Most cars don't make power up to the redline anyway, so if that is the significant difference, then I'd tend to agree that other than fancy verbage, there is none. But, I'm not expert by any means. (hence the post).
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2008 | 02:09 PM
  #9  
OCG35's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,181
Likes: 154
From: OC - So Cal
6700 none rev-up, 7200 rev-up

No significant dif in performance.

Besides, either can be modified to beat the other and it doesn’t take more for one than the other.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 05:09 AM
  #10  
fast04G's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: oahu
yeah..its just the "new" model engine.
 
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 03:08 AM
  #11  
wingsprint410's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Having owned G's with HR and a non-HR engines, I must say that the non-HR is a better match for the G in real world everyday driving. The G 35 is not a light weight sports car, high winding lower torque engines are not the answer. They need torque. The more the better.

Granted the non-HR only has 10ftlbs more torque than the HR, but it delivers a more useful power band than the HR.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #12  
Klubbheads's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,039
Likes: 14
From: LA, North Holly
Originally Posted by wingsprint410
having owned g's with hr and a non-hr engines, i must say that the non-hr is a better match for the g in real world everyday driving. The g 35 is not a light weight sports car, high winding lower torque engines are not the answer. They need torque. The more the better.

Granted the non-hr only has 10ftlbs more torque than the hr, but it delivers a more useful power band than the hr.
lol.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:17 AM
  #13  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Revups don't have as much of a powerdrop after peak power like non-revups do. Any tuner will concur with that. The revup is the better engine, but the differences are very subtle.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 12:19 AM
  #14  
Skaterbasist's Avatar
Retired SuperMod
Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,068
Likes: 101
From: Southern Cali --> 818
Originally Posted by wingsprint410
Having owned G's with HR and a non-HR engines, I must say that the non-HR is a better match for the G in real world everyday driving. The G 35 is not a light weight sports car, high winding lower torque engines are not the answer. They need torque. The more the better.

Granted the non-HR only has 10ftlbs more torque than the HR, but it delivers a more useful power band than the HR.
Sorry but this is nothing close to the truth. The VQ35HR and VQ37VHR are superior engines compared to the DE.

The VQ35DE makes great torque, but don't have that top-end like the HR/VHR. And its not as if our VQ35DE's are torque monsters to begin with.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #15  
driftsucky's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 156
From: Rochester NY
So, between the two, is there a REAL WORLD difference? Whether it be performance, reliability, or anything in between, do the motors hold up. I ask because my ONLY experience is with the VQ35DE. It held up fine under what I put it through and I summise that any advancement would be okay; especially given that the next car will not be thrashed upon as my Z was.

I also may want to boost it somewhere down the line. I remember when the Z came out (and maybe two years into it) any type of boosting really required you to reinforce the bottom end whether you planned on making a lot of power or not. APS's TT kit was the only real bolt on kit on the market at the time and that only made about 330-350rwhp at best. I know there's a lot more out there now, and I may not even do all that, but I guess I want to know what I'm in for if I go with an 05+
 
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.