Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G35? Find out the answer in here! (View All Posts)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

300hp engine,stronger? Not really...

Old Nov 9, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
Julian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
300hp engine,stronger? Not really...

We have heard for a while now that the internals on the high rev motor were supposed to be upgraded,but have not yet had the chance to take an 05 motor apart. Well thanks to Jimmy,aka Paranormal,we got our chance. He managed to spin main bearing #6 due to lack of oil. As you can see from the pictures,the rod on the right side is dicolored from the heat and the rod is elongated and egg shaped.A few more seconds and this rod would have snapped and went through the block. Now the rod on the left is out of an 03 model with the 287 hp motor and the rod on the right is from the 05 high rev motor.We can not visually tell the difference in the rods or pistons,so unless Nissan changed the material they used to produce it,the rumor that the 300hp motor is sporting stronger internals is false. We will not make a claim like this without backing it up,that is why I plan on having my engineer take measurments of both rods and give a comparison in the next few days.However upon initial inspections the internals seem to be exactly the same..




MRC MOTORSPORTS

ALL THE FASTEST G'S ARE BUILT AT MRC'S

G35 Driver's OFFICIAL UTEC AND TURBO XS DEALER



UTEC INSIDE
 

Last edited by Julian; Jan 14, 2006 at 11:06 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #2  
Ivory05G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
I'd have to say your fears are unfounded for now untill they are tensile tested etc...
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 05:46 PM
  #3  
badtziscool's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
What about the other internal parts? Like the valve springs. Maybe Nissan only upgraded certain internal parts.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 05:58 PM
  #4  
rcdash's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 32
From: NC
Thanks for the info MRC - I doubt that tensile strength has increased if the mold hasn't changed at all.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #5  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
As far as I've read, the only thing that was beefed up were the connecting rod bolts. That's it.

BTW, what was he doing when the bearing spun? I'm a firm believer that the VQ35 is not happy operating at higher rpms (6500+rpms) for extended periods. Rod/bearing failures are fairly common with the VQ35 motors where as I've never read of one single rod/bearing failure on an NA VQ30. Even ones that have seen 7500rpm duty.
 

Last edited by DaveB; Nov 9, 2005 at 06:06 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #6  
Julian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DaveB
As far as I've read, the only thing that was beefed up were the connecting rod bolts. That's it.

BTW, what was he doing when the bearing spun? I'm a firm believer that the VQ35 is not happy operating at higher rpms (6500+rpms) for extended periods. Rod/bearing failures are fairly common with the VQ35 motors where as I've never read of one single rod/bearing failure on an NA VQ30. Even ones that have seen 7500rpm duty.
he was only at about 3500rpms when it went.We found the car to be about 3 qts of oil low,although we do not know if that was a cause or effect situation.At any rate he thrashed his crank shaft in the process.The rods and the rod bolts appear to be exactly the same.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #7  
Julian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ivory05G
I'd have to say your fears are unfounded for now untill they are tensile tested etc...
Correct,that is why I did point out that unless they changed the material used on the rods, the rods "appeared" to be exactly the same.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #8  
Ivory05G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
I would not think the mold would change unless it was necessary. New molds are very expensive, whereas a change in material could yield stronger rods. Any way, not flamming, just saying it aint over till it's over.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #9  
Ivory05G's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Another theory, if the pistons are lighter, then the rods would in effect be stronger...
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #10  
trebien's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: ATX
I seriously doubt Nissan would release the changes to the 05 motor if they didn't do them.

Can't remember where... but I'm about 98% sure there was a press release/official information released about what the changes were.

edit: from here

"- The engine is the new higher performance version of the standard 350Z VQ engine
- Modifications made to achieve 300 horsepower include:
- strengthened connecting rods and bolts
- double-mass crank pulley
- revised shape of the piston head
- new camshaft profile, remapped ECM and more"

Seems like there was more info out there... really don't have time or effort to argue.
 

Last edited by trebien; Nov 9, 2005 at 08:03 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #11  
nismo pete's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
The modifications for the 05 motor only apply to the anaversary motor
The conrods do not now have bolts, but studs & nuts
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #12  
P_Diddy's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,479
Likes: 3
From: Santa Clara, CA
The con rods have different # designations on them. the Left one says 35 and the other one says 14. Just to put on the new numbers, new molds had to have been made for 05+. They could use a different alloy to make them stronger while still maintaining the shape. The 03 vs. 05 rods should weigh the same even if the alloy is different, since steel alloys will generally have the same density.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #13  
DaveB's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,573
Likes: 72
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by trebien
- double-mass crank pulley
And people are running UDPs on these motors? Scary. The upgraded pulley is there to protect the engine (bearings, rods, crank) from the higher operating rpms. Clearly Nissan felt this was necessary protection and only confirms my argument that the stock pulley is in fact a damper.

This guy wasn't running UDPs was he?
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:44 PM
  #14  
Julian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by nismo pete
The modifications for the 05 motor only apply to the anaversary motor
The conrods do not now have bolts, but studs & nuts
The connecting rods still use the bolts as you can see.The motor is from an 05 6 speed G35 that is the high rev motor.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2005 | 09:45 PM
  #15  
Julian's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DaveB
And people are running UDPs on these motors? Scary. The upgraded pulley is there to protect the engine (bearings, rods, crank) from the higher operating rpms. Clearly Nissan felt this was necessary protection and only confirms my argument that the stock pulley is in fact a damper.

This guy wasn't running UDPs was he?
I can not recall,I will ask my mechanic tommorow..good point to bring up.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.